On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Comrades!
>
> We just finished a very productive Debian System Administration team
> sprint in LinuxHotel, Essen, Germany. All six of the current DSA
> members (Faidon, Luca, Martin, Peter, Stephen, Tollef) and our recruit
> (Hector) were
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:44:50PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Raphael Geissert writes ("Doing something about "should remain private
> forever" emails"):
> > So everyone knows that the declassification of -private isn't going
> > to happen any time soon.
>
> I think the declassification GR was u
Comrades!
We just finished a very productive Debian System Administration team
sprint in LinuxHotel, Essen, Germany. All six of the current DSA
members (Faidon, Luca, Martin, Peter, Stephen, Tollef) and our recruit
(Hector) were present. This was the first time that all of us have
met in person
On 21 June 2013 10:00, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Effectively preventing people from having a complete archive to
> potential see the context of some replies to threads that might get
> declassified but with some messages stripped?
In the hypothetical case the declassification ever happens: yes.
A
Raphael Geissert writes ("Doing something about "should remain private forever"
emails"):
> So everyone knows that the declassification of -private isn't going
> to happen any time soon.
I think the declassification GR was unwise. The outcome is
predictable. I think it would be best to explicit
Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: Proposal #3: Upstream/Debian Project donations
(was: PaySwarm-based donations)"):
> I do, however, want to repeat my point that this kind of thing is likely
> to be quite divisive even outside one distro. Donations from end-users
> are highly likely to go mainly to high
Hello,
I agree with you.
It seems that the problem is only the permission of the database
directory (/usr/local/var/gtags/sitekeys).
It is very easy for you to change it. It is set at the time of
installation.
[htags/Makefile.am]
+---
|...
* Raphael Geissert [2013-06-18 22:49:55 CEST]:
> So, "the opposite" of declassifying: instead of finding out what can be
> declassified, remove all "should remain private forever", VAC, and similar
> messages from the archive and put them in a tarball which is later encrypted
> by a key that is
8 matches
Mail list logo