Link Partner (Psybeat.com)

2012-06-25 Thread Psychedelic Link
Dear Webmaster, We are Psybeat.com, a psychedelic music community. We have found your website to be a valuable resource and encourage you to consider a link swap. Please email me for more information. Kind regards, Sam Psybeat.com

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-25 Thread Holger Levsen
On Montag, 25. Juni 2012, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > mentors is a special case here as it might distribute non-distributable > stuff when people upload buggy packages. So there is no real way to run > this as official Debian service imho. as if we would never distribute non-distributable stuff via ftp

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:01:56PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > The current practice for debian.net entries is that they are directly > entered in the debian.net zone as 3rd-level records. I am seeking > comments on a proposal to alter this practice. Thanks for working on the idea! Here are

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 06:12:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > So until these policies and whatever else is needed is in place there > is no way to run this as an official service. That is correct, yes. -- Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o . Maître de confé

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-25 Thread Raphael Geissert
Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > On 06/25/2012 09:46 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> Take mentors.debian.net, perhaps the most visible debian.net service. How >> is it relevant to lay users whether or not this service is officially >> blessed? It works great for all parties involved. Whether or not it's >> ble

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-25 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 06/25/2012 05:39 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:01:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> mentors is a special case here as it might distribute non-distributable >> stuff when people upload buggy packages. So there is no real way to run >> this as official Debian service

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:01:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > mentors is a special case here as it might distribute non-distributable > stuff when people upload buggy packages. So there is no real way to run > this as official Debian service imho. Let's avoid spreading this myth. The above is

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-25 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 06/25/2012 09:46 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Fri, June 22, 2012 23:01, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >> There is nothing carved into stone yet! I just want to hear your >> comments on this. The key point is that lay users will not understand >> the difference between debian.net and debian.org, a

Re: RFC - Changing current policy of debian.net entries

2012-06-25 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Fri, June 22, 2012 23:01, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > There is nothing carved into stone yet! I just want to hear your > comments on this. The key point is that lay users will not understand > the difference between debian.net and debian.org, and we should not > require that they do. The purpose