On 06/25/2012 09:46 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Fri, June 22, 2012 23:01, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >> There is nothing carved into stone yet! I just want to hear your >> comments on this. The key point is that lay users will not understand >> the difference between debian.net and debian.org, and we should not >> require that they do. The purpose of this RFC is to seek comment on how >> to address this concern and the above proposal is perhaps one such way. > > I'm not clear why it is problematic that lay users do not know the > difference between 'official' and 'unofficial' services. > > Take mentors.debian.net, perhaps the most visible debian.net service. How > is it relevant to lay users whether or not this service is officially > blessed? It works great for all parties involved. Whether or not it's > blessed is mostly a project internal issue.
mentors is a special case here as it might distribute non-distributable stuff when people upload buggy packages. So there is no real way to run this as official Debian service imho. > > [...] -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe87d37.9050...@bzed.de
