On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 12:53:07PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I still do not understand why Debian can redistribute any non-reviewed
> source package through people.debian.org or vcs.debian.org, but would have
> legal problems of letting persons read the incoming queue.
ftp-master is (delibera
Le Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 11:25:16AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:12:58AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I do not know, maybe the core of the problem is not whether the packages are
> > available, but who takes the responsability to make them available : I
> > thin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:12:58AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> I do not know, maybe the core of the problem is not whether the packages are
>> available, but who takes the responsability to make them available : I think
>>
* Wouter Verhelst:
> This will never happen, for legal reasons (unless you want us to set up
> a new non-US repository). Part of the requirements in doing the
> crypto-to-main transition was that uploaded packages would not be made
> available for download until some steps were taken first.
Excep
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 11:12:58AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I do not know, maybe the core of the problem is not whether the packages are
> available, but who takes the responsability to make them available : I think I
> remember that it was asked and refused that they can be downloaded from t
Le Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 01:24:20PM +0900, Paul Wise a écrit :
>
> Unless you are in the ftpteam group, you won't be able to access the
> packages in NEW:
Hmmm… the Tyranny of Unix Permissions[1] :(
Anyway, many packages provide other means of access (VCS, mentors.d.n, personal
repository…). How
6 matches
Mail list logo
