Bug#316581: marked as done (project: db.debian.org not accepting key in keyring)

2008-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:20:24 +0930 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line samosa has been upgraded to etch has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#354747: marked as done (db.debian.org: SSL certificate expired)

2008-01-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:16:00 +0930 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line db.debian.org HTTPS SSL cert has been updated has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Re: RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)

2008-01-17 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:18:30PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote: > Currently, when having discussions about improvements to Debian, it is > not always clear when consensus has been reached, and people willing to > implement it may start too early, [...] Isn't it useful to have sample implementation

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-17 Thread Anthony Towns
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:55:19AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > Why can't we manage the DEP list just like the rest in a VCS ? A VCS > > > commit is atomic. :) > > To avoid religious was on which VCS to choose :-) > Just use svn for that part.

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-17 Thread Hubert Chathi
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:36:39 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:18:47PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> > (²) And this mail it's just there as a very unbureaucratic and >> light > mechanism for obtaining a DEP number. Why can't we manage >> the DEP l

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]]

2008-01-17 Thread Felipe Sateler
Forwarding a message from Sven Luther On Thursday 17 January 2008 13:33:36 Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:53:35PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > > Sven Luther wrote: > > > What about having a centralized email address where to send original > > > proposals, and which forward the p

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]]

2008-01-17 Thread Felipe Sateler
Sven Luther wrote: > > What about having a centralized email address where to send original > proposals, and which forward the proposal to the appropriate list, after > having incremented the proposal number ? > > This is already what we do for bug reports, so it should not cause a > major probl

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
(we're getting offtopic here) On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, MJ Ray wrote: > > Based on the number of repositories hosted on Alioth. And on day-to-day > > work within many Debian teams. > > What's the attraction of hosting git on Alioth? I've had one request > to clone from my own public server there, but

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-17 Thread MJ Ray
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, MJ Ray wrote: [on svn "most widely used VCS within Debian."] > > Based on what numbers? Does "within Debian" mean on d.o hosts? That > > would ignore much dVCS use. > > Based on the number of repositories hosted on Alioth. And on d

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, MJ Ray wrote: > > Just use svn for that part. It's by far the most widely used VCS within > > Debian. > > Based on what numbers? Does "within Debian" mean on d.o hosts? That > would ignore much dVCS use. Based on the number of repositories hosted on Alioth. And on day-to-da

Re: ISO DVD

2008-01-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:14:01AM -0200, filipe ferreira wrote: >Bom dia. > >Estou entrando em contato, pois tenho uma dúvida com relação a ISO DVD que >está disponível no site. Quando fui ver na página tem o tamanho de >4.4GBalguns dos DVD'S. Quando baixei a ISO notei que o tamanho é de >387mb, e

Re: RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)

2008-01-17 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:18:22AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > In the current proposal d-project is only used as a global mutual > exclusion tool to get the next available number in the DEP namespace, no > other announcement purpose is intended for d-project. > > The underlying overall idea

ISO DVD

2008-01-17 Thread filipe ferreira
Bom dia. Estou entrando em contato, pois tenho uma dúvida com relação a ISO DVD que está disponível no site. Quando fui ver na página tem o tamanho de 4.4GBalguns dos DVD'S. Quando baixei a ISO notei que o tamanho é de 387mb, está certo o tamanho desta ISO. Aguardo resposta. Filipe.Debian

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-17 Thread MJ Ray
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > Why can't we manage the DEP list just like the rest in a VCS ? A VCS > > > commit is atomic. :) > > > > To avoid religious was on which VCS to choose :-) > > Just use svn for that part. It's by far th

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 17/01/2008, David Nusinow wrote: > Would it be possible to add an RSS feed to the DEP with diffs or the > changelog? It'd be nice to be able to track these from a distance > without following the various mailing lists. I'm sure I'm not the only > one overburdened by the number of lists he's carr

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]]

2008-01-17 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On to, 2008-01-17 at 11:21 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > What about having a centralized email address where to send original > proposals, and which forward the proposal to the appropriate list, after > having incremented the proposal number ? This would work, and has no technical problems, b

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]]

2008-01-17 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Forwarding a mail from Sven Luther on the topic of how to get unique numbers assigned. I've tried to keep thread references proper ... - Forwarded message from Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 09:41:01 +0100 To: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: debian-pro

Re: RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)

2008-01-17 Thread MJ Ray
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 January 2008, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I think the initial mail should be sended to debian-devel-announce > > > because there might be a lot of interested people who do not read > > > debian-project. At least I feel DEP0 should go init

ikiwiki running wiki.debian.org? (Re: RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs))

2008-01-17 Thread Philippe Cloutier
Did you consider moving dep.d.n over to wiki.debian.org once that is run by ikiwiki and DEPs are common practise? Since when is wiki.d.o scheduled to be run by ikiwiki? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Why can't we manage the DEP list just like the rest in a VCS ? A VCS > > commit is atomic. :) > > To avoid religious was on which VCS to choose :-) Just use svn for that part. It's by far the most widely used VCS within Debian. And git-svn works

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-17 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:18:47PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > (²) And this mail it's just there as a very unbureaucratic and light > > mechanism for obtaining a DEP number. > Why can't we manage the DEP list just like the rest in a VCS ? A VCS > commit is atomic. :) To avoid religious w

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-17 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:55:29PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > First, as one of the drivers, I'd like to explicitly say that I like and > approve of the changes dato made to the draft in his dep0.dato branch, > and the comments he's had on the discussion so far. Ack. Moreover for future changes

Re: RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)

2008-01-17 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 12:44:00PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > Until I read this paragraph I was thinking that the initial proposals should > maybe be announced on d-d-a so that at least all DDs could be informed > about the proposal. I'm still unsure whether that would not be a good idea > or not

Re: RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)

2008-01-17 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 01:31:43PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Suggested document contents: > * An history of changes made to the DEP, with their rationale, or links > to emails explaining giving it. > ... which you did: Yes, but is it really needed? I mean, a DEP should contain the status