Bug#31581: It's Natalia.

2007-11-29 Thread delmar men-shen
Hello My name is Natalia. how are you? I find your profile and e-mail on a site of acquaintances. I want to find the more friend and my love. If you is real are interested, answer to me and we can begin our acquaintance. A little about me. I was born 30 DEC 1979. I work as the manager in the insura

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Michael Banck
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:23:34AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote: > > I believe "buildd redundancy" does not mean having 2+ active buildds, > > but having at least one active buildd who can keep up, plus a possibly > > inactive backup buildd who could quickly be

Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring

2007-11-29 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 03:39:29PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'm planning to integrate that in DDPO/PTS webpages. Cc'ing -qa to avoid > possible duplicates. This is now integrated in the PTS, which shows a DM flag associated to each package which has "DM-Upload-Allowed: yes". Cheers. -- S

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 29/11/2007, Michael Banck wrote: > I believe "buildd redundancy" does not mean having 2+ active buildds, > but having at least one active buildd who can keep up, plus a possibly > inactive backup buildd who could quickly be made active in case the > primary buildd fails. I'd add “having a respo

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Tim Cutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-29 16:27]: > Er - I don't know, offhand. I'm not that familiar with either > architecture, aside from running a bunch of IRIX systems about 10 years > ago. These are two Cobalt boxes... It's mipsel. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To U

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Tim Cutts
On 29 Nov 2007, at 3:10 pm, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Tim Cutts wrote: Anyway - thanks for doing that, I really appreciate it. As to the mips machines that Steve dropped off at Sanger the week before last, I should hopefully find the time to rack them up and install them

Re: Please help me remove this

2007-11-29 Thread David Moreno
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 10:29 -0800, Masood wrote: > Can you please delete this page from your data base: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2003/08/msg00030.html > It is very embarrassing and very old. It is the first thing that comes > up when searching for my name. I'm afraid that we are unab

Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring

2007-11-29 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 03:57:49PM +, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:57:22AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > > dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Full name: Aur?lien G?R?ME > > > (rewritten w/o half-broken encoding, maybe it w

Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring

2007-11-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:57:22AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Full name: Aur?lien G?R?ME > > (rewritten w/o half-broken encoding, maybe it would be nice to send > > mails using something different from us-ascii?) >

Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring

2007-11-29 Thread Anthony Towns
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:57:22AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Full name: Aur?lien G?R?ME > (rewritten w/o half-broken encoding, maybe it would be nice to send > mails using something different from us-ascii?) Patches welcome. A suggested Content-Type: header mig

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Tim Cutts wrote: > Anyway - thanks for doing that, I really appreciate it. As to the > mips machines that Steve dropped off at Sanger the week before last, I > should hopefully find the time to rack them up and install them on > Friday, barring any firefighting I need t

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Michael Banck
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:18:38PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > I think you'd better look at db.debian.org/machines.cgi to have an idea > > of the current status... > > I can see the current status fine on jvw's buildd pages: those three arches > only have a single active buildd listed when they'r

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Tim Cutts
On 29 Nov 2007, at 12:23 pm, Peter Palfrader wrote: [ snipped RT close message ] Glad to see that, although I don't think I received the message. Must be something wrong with the forwarding chain between there and me - almost certainly my fault. apologies! Anyway - thanks for doing that

Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring

2007-11-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 22/11/2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/dm-uploaders.txt > > Thanks. Now that'd be great if DDPO could have those informations as > well :) Hi from Mérida, I'm planning to integrate that in DDPO/PTS webpages. Cc'ing -qa to avoid possible duplicates. Cheers

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Tim Cutts wrote: > I knew Peter had been working on it, but I didn't know that the > machine was available for use, since I wasn't notified when he > finished. Hey, I'm only the local admin, what do I know... :-) | Subject: [rt.debian.org #59] New alpha porter machin

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 29 November 2007, Luk Claes wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:32:40AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html lists that alpha, mips > > and mipsel a having buildd redundancy, but that does not seem to match > > reality as both only have a single b

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 29 November 2007, Luk Claes wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:01:54PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Thursday 29 November 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > James Andrewartha a écrit : > > > > Not a buildd, but [1] notes that there's an alpha porting machine > > > > waiting for more th

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Tim Cutts
On 29 Nov 2007, at 10:49 am, Aurelien Jarno wrote: James Andrewartha a écrit : Not a buildd, but [1] notes that there's an alpha porting machine waiting for more than a year to be set up by DSA. I don't know if there's an RT ticket, but there is a bug [2] about this, which was closed this

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Luk Claes
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:32:40AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > http://release.debian.org/etch_arch_qualify.html lists that alpha, mips and > mipsel a having buildd redundancy, but that does not seem to match reality > as both only have a single buildd (alpha: goetz; mips: ball; mipsel: rem). Hmm,

Re: linhdd concerns

2007-11-29 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 29/11/2007, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > override files allow comments which means giving a justification is > already possible. So it seems this just needs to be documented as best > practice? Yes. -- Cyril Brulebois pgpwk92xgu5mY.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread James Andrewartha
Not a buildd, but [1] notes that there's an alpha porting machine waiting for more than a year to be set up by DSA. I don't know if there's an RT ticket, but there is a bug [2] about this, which was closed this week, although it looks like by accident. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/2

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Luk Claes
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:01:54PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 29 November 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > James Andrewartha a écrit : > > > Not a buildd, but [1] notes that there's an alpha porting machine > > > waiting for more than a year to be set up by DSA. I don't know if > > > ther

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 29 November 2007, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > James Andrewartha a écrit : > > Not a buildd, but [1] notes that there's an alpha porting machine > > waiting for more than a year to be set up by DSA. I don't know if > > there's an RT ticket, but there is a bug [2] about this, which was > > cl

Re: linhdd concerns

2007-11-29 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:08:33AM +, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Thursday 29 November 2007, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I know, but maybe (but that's sad if we need to do that) we should > > > have overrides validated by the QA people

Re: No buildd redundancy for alpha/mips/mipsel

2007-11-29 Thread Aurelien Jarno
James Andrewartha a écrit : > Not a buildd, but [1] notes that there's an alpha porting machine waiting > for more than a year to be set up by DSA. I don't know if there's an RT > ticket, but there is a bug [2] about this, which was closed this week, > although it looks like by accident. This m

Re: linhdd concerns

2007-11-29 Thread cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
On Thursday 29 November 2007, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I know, but maybe (but that's sad if we need to do that) we should > > have overrides validated by the QA people … *sigh*. > > Should the override file have a justification field for each (error)

Re: linhdd concerns

2007-11-29 Thread Kalle Kivimaa
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know, but maybe (but that's sad if we need to do that) we should > have overrides validated by the QA people … *sigh*. Should the override file have a justification field for each (error) override? That would help generic DD's going through all ove

Re: linhdd concerns

2007-11-29 Thread Pierre Habouzit
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 06:49:37AM +, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 02:19:21PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > or we could disallow the override of >= E: errors in lintian, and make > > > lintian reboot your computer, fill y