Hi,
On Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 13:13:36 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> -vote dropped
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:06:01PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > > Maintaining a buildd isn't trivial, there's:
> > >
> > > - making sure they don't get rooted, and their builds compromised
> > >
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:13:36PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> -vote dropped
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:06:01PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > i think someone running more than one autobuilder for more than _two_
> > years now (okay, not for the officical archive, but i see that as
> >
Hi,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> How is the current DPL board proposal different from the
> project SCUD that was tried out a couple of DPL's ago? From what I
> recall, project SCUD started out with a bang, but did not end up
> making much of an impression on me. Give
Hey guys...
Thanks for all the responses and I got it figured out; my buddy went
there and thought it was a Quick-time like player needed to view the
page. Nothing happened and so he never told me about it. But I would
think a program install would show you something...? Anyway, from
reading y
-vote dropped
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:06:01PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Maintaining a buildd isn't trivial, there's:
> >
> > - making sure they don't get rooted, and their builds compromised
> > - keeping the chroot up to date
> > - keeping in sync with w-b / sbuild chan
On Thursday 15 February 2007 00:15, joseph irvin wrote:
> I would like to try Debian Linux, but don't know which packages I
> need. Which packages would you recommend for the average user,
> including internet, photos, email, word processing, and music?
The best thing to do is probably to downloa
I would like to try Debian Linux, but don't know which packages I
need. Which packages would you recommend for the average user,
including internet, photos, email, word processing, and music? Can
entire packages be downloaded or do individual files need to be
downloaded? thank you!
Rev.
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070213 17:18]:
> "I don't like this person, but I have to work with him in this project,
> so I would like to hide that fact from him/her. I don't want to rank
> him/her above NOTA, but I also don't want to have to explain that"
that problem can easily be av
Debian.org
#REVO.gaming
Alen »kobrzZz« Savic
Dear Mr. or Mrs.,
How would it be, to become a sponsor of successful team (clan) of players
playing a computer game called CALL OF DUTY?
We are a group of 9 players, and we are playing for a multi-gaming clan,
named #REVO.gaming. This clan is 3 yea
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "I don't like this person, but I have to work with him in this project,
> so I would like to hide that fact from him/her. I don't want to rank
> him/her above NOTA, but I also don't want to have to explain that"
So, what can one conclude about debian fr
Hi,
How is the current DPL board proposal different from the
project SCUD that was tried out a couple of DPL's ago? From what I
recall, project SCUD started out with a bang, but did not end up
making much of an impression on me. Given that this has been tried
before, and mostly did no
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Grr. I shouldn't be doing this, but I can't help myself. Here's some
> counterpoint to some of Raphael's points. Please consider them only
> to moderate some of his claims, not necessarily to disagree with them
> in principle.
Heh, you're right. I tend t
Hi,
> Maintaining a buildd isn't trivial, there's:
>
> - making sure they don't get rooted, and their builds compromised
> - keeping the chroot up to date
> - keeping in sync with w-b / sbuild changes
> - keeping in sync with the infrastructure upstream (building from
> incoming
On 12/02/07 at 11:00 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been talking about having a DPL board and I might want to go further
> and try the principles out by proposing a DPL board in the upcoming
> elections. So I'm explaining here how I expect such a board to work.
> Feel free to comm
[moving this to a more appropriate list]
Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 07:12:31PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:33:19AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 11:11:55PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06
Grr. I shouldn't be doing this, but I can't help myself. Here's some
counterpoint to some of Raphael's points. Please consider them only
to moderate some of his claims, not necessarily to disagree with them
in principle.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:55:10AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> But you're
16 matches
Mail list logo
