On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 01:13:36PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > -vote dropped > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:06:01PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > i think someone running more than one autobuilder for more than _two_ > > years now (okay, not for the officical archive, but i see that as > > nonrelevant here) demonstrats very good that he mets your mentioned > > technical constraints. > > AIUI, Aurelian doesn't have the capability to run a non-emulated arm > buildd. While http://blog.aurel32.net/?p=25 is a good demonstration > of some things, I don't think it's the level of buildd we want for our > release architectures.
Wow, was there a point to your post or was pure insult? Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
