Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:54:35PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > But if they did mean it, line 2 could be "yes. here's why you deserved
> > it" which almost no-one will ever accept. Why prolong the flames?
> >
> Hi MJR,
Please do not send personal messages to m
Please don't top post, we all read English in chronological (not random)
order.
http://wiki.ursine.ca/Best_Online_Quoting_Practices
Piotr Dziubinski wrote:
> Only Etch supports amd64, so I was forced to use Etch.
>
> Command I have used:
> apt-get install firefox
>
> NOT
> apt-get install icewe
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Sam, 27 Jan 2007, Piotr Dziubinski wrote:
> > Iceweasel and Firefox are a different products, very similar, but
> > different.
>
> Can YOU please explain me what *important* differences there are?
[...]
> Otherwise I would like
lista de emails de empresas lista de emails de . Venda de mala direta listas
de e-mails, software mala direta programa para spam, programa para mala direta
programa para enviar email. Programa de mala direta opt in emails:
Visite agora:
http://www.divulgaemails.com
Mala-direta mala direta via e
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:54:35PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My example of an entry would be like this:
> > joe user: you flamed me!
> > peter hacker: oh. I'm sorry, I didn't mean it.
> > joe user: thanks.
> [...]
>
> But if they did mean it, line 2 c
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:02:43PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> I've suggested that iceweasel provides+conflicts+replaces firefox,
> which AFAICT would instead produce the output:
>
> Note, selecting iceweasel instead of firefox
> [...other stuff about packages...]
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, MJ Ray wrote:
The August 2005 -private blow-up seemed like two groups (of totally
Well, the thing you call "blow-up" was the question, whether
Debian as a project should send condolences to the family of
a Debian maintainer who died. I do not want to discuss this
issue he
lista de emails de empresas lista de emails de . Venda de mala direta listas
de e-mails, software mala direta programa para spam, programa para mala direta
programa para enviar email. Programa de mala direta opt in emails:
Visite agora:
http://www.divulgaemails.com
Mala-direta mala direta via e
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 10:33:13AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 03:55:33PM +0100, Piotr Dziubinski wrote:
> > Only Etch supports amd64, so I was forced to use Etch.
> >
> There is an unofficial Sarge release for amd64. I use it on a couple of
> servers and many Debia
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:48:52PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> --
> In the west we kill people like chickens.
> [Agree] [Disagree]
No opinion. When I was in the west I didn't see any prople that
resembled chickens.
-- hendrik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 01:51:28PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Yes, but that would mean that it could have hundreds of members.
> > That's just not manageable.
>
> Then nor are ~1000 developers, nor the 6000+ who run a phone company
> with me, nor the 3.5million who own shops with me, nor any other l
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 01:42:20PM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > [...] It would be a powerful loose cannon on deck, [...]
> >
> > I must note that it would be no less powerful loose cannon on deck than
> > the technical committee,
>
> It maybe loose, but we know which way the technical committee is
>
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> Yes, but that would mean that it could have hundreds of members.
> That's just not manageable.
Then nor are ~1000 developers, nor the 6000+ who run a phone company
with me, nor the 3.5million who own shops with me, nor any other large
multi-member bus
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:55:02AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > [...] It would be a powerful loose cannon on deck, [...]
>
> I must note that it would be no less powerful loose cannon on deck than
> the technical committee,
It maybe loose, but we know which way
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 02:03:13PM +0100, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
> I also believe it too difficult to implement in already existing (Debian)
> constitutional bodies governed by other (working) rules. But I thought it
> might worth consideration (even for experimentation) when designing and
> setti
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 01:27:47PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:40:30PM +0100, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
> > And what about having the election body enlarged to the complete (or
> > voluntary) developers crowd with a permanent and _easy_ way of voting.
> [...]
> > Note
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My example of an entry would be like this:
> joe user: you flamed me!
> peter hacker: oh. I'm sorry, I didn't mean it.
> joe user: thanks.
[...]
But if they did mean it, line 2 could be "yes. here's why you deserved
it" which almost no-one will ever
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:40:30PM +0100, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
> And what about having the election body enlarged to the complete (or
> voluntary) developers crowd with a permanent and _easy_ way of voting.
[...]
> Note that I do not want to replace debate by voting. I simply prefer
> to replace
Mike Hommey wrote:
> To be fair, it's not exactly true, because upgrading from firefox to
> iceweasel in debian means upgrading from version 1.0 or 1.5 to 2.0, and
> there are substancial changes that some people dislike, myself included.
>
> Which means Piotr is actually probably complaining abou
"Piotr Dziubinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no longer firefox in debian etch, so after typing:
> apt-get install firefox
> I would like to see announcement: Firefox packages are no longer present in
> debian distribution, please try iceweasel.
>
> Do you see a difference?
Yes. Just p
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 04:25:26PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yes, but that would mean that it could have hundreds of members.
> > That's just not manageable.
>
> You're an optimist, I would think that there are at most a few dozen
> interested p
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sam, 27 Jan 2007, Piotr Dziubinski wrote:
> > Iceweasel and Firefox are a different products, very similar, but different.
>
> Can YOU please explain me what *important* differences there are?
>
> If you m
22 matches
Mail list logo
