Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 12:54:35PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote: > > But if they did mean it, line 2 could be "yes. here's why you deserved > > it" which almost no-one will ever accept. Why prolong the flames? > > > Hi MJR,
Please do not send personal messages to me via mailing lists. > at this point you would have someone who was flamed and someone who > meant to flame them. This would be a clear statement about the flamer. So? We already knew they were a flamer and need to decide to deal with them or tolerate them. The pillory-BTS would add little data. In some cases, it could let flamers sow doubt about their behaviour. [...] Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
