MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So many admirers defending aj's honour, so few comments about trying a
> SMART fix for the bug instead...
Maybe, just maybe, that's because we don't agree with you and don't think
that any other fix is likely to be any more successful than what we have
right n
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
No. Many applicants simply package stuff no one installs on their
system. And even if some people do, depressingly few people report bugs
they notice - in most cases, they simply remove the package and use
something else.
Well, if no one installs it, it doesn't ma
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 07:27:03AM +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So many admirers defending aj's honour, so few comments
> about trying a SMART fix for the bug instead...
So, have you got a SMART fix, then?
Cheers,
Brett.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Fri, 2006-19-05 at 07:27 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Evan Prodromou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [...] http://evan.prodromou.name/CC_Licence_Distinctions
>
> I think some of that is shooting at shadows, some is hyperbole
> and some is contentious:
You're free to think what you like, but if you're go
On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 12:34 -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote:
> So: if there's a public statement by Debian or
> debian-legal on a license (like http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary
> is now), would it be misleading for an organization to point to that
> statement? Especially if it was clear that th
5 matches
Mail list logo
