On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 12:34 -0400, Evan Prodromou wrote: > So: if there's a public statement by Debian or > debian-legal on a license (like http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary > is now), would it be misleading for an organization to point to that > statement? Especially if it was clear that the review and approval was > not an endorsement of the organization or their goals?
My suggestion would be that any organisation wishing so just uses the facts to describe the DFSG-fitness of their licence. For example: "Over the past years, Debian has accepted a number of works covered under this licence into their archive." or similar statements. This requires nothing to change from the current situation. Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
