Subject of the message: Status
Recipient of the message: Lou Rabon
Way back on 9/30/03 says me:
> "Elderly Man River", in which Freburg attempts to sing Steven Foster's
> "Old Man River"...
s/Steven Foster/Jerome Kern/
s/Old/Ol'/
Drat.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:40:43PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi all,
Any feedback so far?
> Due to organizational issues, the Debian DevRoom will be shared with the
> people from the Free Java community. We agreed on a schedule that gives
> both groups three hours to talk about subjects spe
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:14:49PM +0100, martin raven wrote:
> siemka
In English:
I don't think it's the proper list to sending Polish-language messages.
I hope it was made by mistake.
In Polish
Nie sądzę by to była właściwa lista na wysyłanie polskojęzycznych wiadomości.
Mam nadzieję, że to była
> Would it be so bad if dinstall rejected uploads that appeared to be NMUs
> but didn't identify themselves as such in the changelog?
Lame.
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 04:27:46PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:03:22PM -0500, Peter Constantinidis wrote:
> > I read in the news today that the release of X 4.4 will have a new
> > license that requires an advertising clause. As a result, it seems
> > likely that Debian
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:38:16AM +1300, Mike Beattie wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 11:11:12AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I have felt consistently under pressure to do 2 things:
> >
> > 1) release xfree86 4.3.0-1 to sid ASAP
> > 2) delegate responsibility ASAP
> >
> > Very few actions
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:22:24PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:08:19PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> [...]
> >> I did, however, state that I felt that 4.3.0-1 was by far the superior
> >> base to work from in sid, for a n
siemka
On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 08:55:38PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> I think you got me wrong (quite possible, considering my language). In
> fact, that is what I wanted to say: he should rely on trust, and not
> install fixed rules or technical measures to prevent things like that.
Would it be so
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 02:21:31PM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:04:30 -0500
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This upload was done without advance notice to, or consultation with the
> > rest of the X Strike Force (XSF) team
>
> I asked Branden for clarific
On Ter, 2004-02-03 at 14:00, John Goerzen wrote:
> seem easy enough to at least log on to the machine that hosts *the*
> www.debian.org and vi a couple of files.
I don't think it's THAT easy, but I do agree that we could exploit (oh
geez, did I say that word?!) the possibility of fortifying our ba
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:00:28PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:25:36AM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> > > > I cannot reach security.debian.org since saturday or so. What's up?
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-news/debian-news-2004/msg5.html
> > I
Michael Banck wrote:
> > Right, they access www.debian.org and try to find a status note. It
> > can't be that difficult to put a note on the webserver manually even
> > without tool support.
>
> The problem is that we don't have 'the' webserver. We have a couple of
> dozen mirrors, running www.d
Title: Clarke Fussells
Important Auction Announcement
Auction of full Savoury Goods
Plant to be held on:
Wednesday 4th February 2004
at
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:32:43PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:05:32PM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> >
> > > It would be very nice if people would actually READ the
> > > announcement. W
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:28:12AM +0100, Bine&Ro wrote:
> Le lun 02/02/2004 à 19:57, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder a écrit
> > Clinging to sanity, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mumbled in his beard:
> > > address to submit it to. I am currently developing an application
> > > which is
> >
> > Hi,
> >
Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> Where is that stated?
http://www.debian.org/News/ (maybe not all too obvious, though, and the
front page only lists -announce)
--
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 01:29:35PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] host www.debian.org
> www.debian.org has address 192.25.206.10
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] host 192.25.206.10
> 10.206.25.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer gluck.debian.org.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I guess most
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:32:43PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:05:32PM +0100, Stephan Austerm?hle wrote:
> > ...
> debian-news should be subscribed by everybody remotely interested in
> Debian.
Yes, but quite some people simply don't. Hard to change.
> > Right, they
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:05:32PM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > It would be very nice if people would actually READ the
> > announcement. Why? Because then they would learn that we cannot
> > update the website
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> It would be very nice if people would actually READ the
> announcement. Why? Because then they would learn that we cannot
> update the website without the www-master service which is ON
> klecker.
Sorry for the incon
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> DAMN IT! DO PEOPLE THINK I WASTE MY TIME JUST FOR THE FUN OF IT?
We've never been able to figure out why you waste your time.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `'
Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:08:59AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > > I cannot reach security.debian.org since saturday or so. What's up?
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-news/debian-news-2004/msg5.html
>
> It'd be very nice if someone could drop a no
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:25:36AM +0100, Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> > > I cannot reach security.debian.org since saturday or so. What's up?
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-news/debian-news-2004/msg5.html
> It'd be very nice if someone could drop a note in the news section on
> www.debian.
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:08:59AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > I cannot reach security.debian.org since saturday or so. What's up?
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-news/debian-news-2004/msg5.html
It'd be very nice if someone could drop a note in the news section on
www.debian.org.
Le lun 02/02/2004 à 19:57, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder a écrit
:
:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Clinging to sanity, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mumbled in his beard:
>
> > address to submit it to. I am currently developing an application
which is
>
> Hi,
>
> thing to do
Stephan Austermühle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot reach security.debian.org since saturday or so. What's up?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-news/debian-news-2004/msg5.html
Joey
--
Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea.
Hi,
I cannot reach security.debian.org since saturday or so. What's up?
Stephan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
29 matches
Mail list logo
