Re: the presence of GNU FDL-licensed works in sarge

On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 02:34:37PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Given there's more ambiguity in whether to apply the DFSG to > > documentation than there is in whether the GFDL passes the DFSG, it > > seemed most sensible just to exempt documentation from the DFSG for > > sarge; so that's the

Re: software patent thing in the european parliament

On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 01:25:56PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > I'd place a link on our front page to the european software patent protest > web page. Nothing flashy, but visible. Comments, objections? Done now. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Re: Doubts on the situation of DEBAIN as opposed to the demand of SCO to IBM

Yimmy Sáenz wrote: I found out the demand of SCO to IBM that will affect to the users of operating systems linux. In case that SCO won the demand also will affect the DEBIAN users? Thanks Sincerely, At the moment it is difficult to see what any decision in that case will imply. However, ple

Fw: Debian-project copy any DVD to a standart CD at home YqJdJtf

Title: WeAGqoE Hello, Debian-project! xroAfmQ hometown weather on Pq Gff 'Here's your skateboard' qcjRI pleads innocent to spying Bt

Doubts on the situation of DEBAIN as opposed to the demand of SCO to IBM

I found out the demand of SCO to IBM that will affect to the users of operating systems linux. In case that SCO won the demand also will affect the DEBIAN users? Thanks Sincerely,

Re: Debian Weekly News - August 19th, 2003

On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 01:26:44AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 04:47:29PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > (In fact, I suspect that all "silent majority" claims are unfalsifiable > > by definition.) > > Not if you can corner a piece of that majority, poll it, and ext

the presence of GNU FDL-licensed works in sarge

Martin, There appears to be confusion regarding the intended presence of GNU FDL-licensed works in sarge. On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 12:33:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > My next post to -devel-announce will discuss some of these finer details. > In short, some members of the FSF have asked for u

Re: software patent thing in the european parliament

Josip Rodin wrote: > I'd place a link on our front page to the european software patent protest > web page. Nothing flashy, but visible. Comments, objections? Great. Regards, Joey -- Reading is a lost art nowadays. -- Michael Weber

Re: FFII needs Debian for online protest against software patents

* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-26 13:25]: > I'd place a link on our front page to the european software patent protest > web page. Nothing flashy, but visible. Comments, objections? Sounds like a good compromise with regards to the proposal from http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2

Re: software patent thing in the european parliament

On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 01:25:56PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > I'd place a link on our front page to the european software patent protest > web page. Nothing flashy, but visible. Comments, objections? > yes please, do it. it is a damned important thing for the future of software in europe. more i

software patent thing in the european parliament

Hi, I'd place a link on our front page to the european software patent protest web page. Nothing flashy, but visible. Comments, objections? -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.

Re: FFII needs Debian for online protest against software patents

* Felix E. Klee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-18 17:24]: > How can we convince Debian to participate in this "online protest"? Not sure, but I doubt it tbh. We didn't participate in such a thing when it last came up (cannot remember what it was). > How can we reach people responsible for the web