Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process)

2000-08-06 Thread Chris Pimlott
As I said, I don't expect every one of these options to exist for everyone; just that there are many different options beyond personally owning a scanner, and I believe for the majority of people, at least one should be viable. And honestly, I don't see why mailing a photograph (the simp

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

2000-08-06 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Aug 06, 2000 at 09:41:39AM +0200, "Jürgen A. Erhard" wrote: > Name just *one* task in Debian that requires a maintainer to use a > scanner. Just one. Apart from joining, that is. Maintaining sane? Okay, maybe not strictly necessary, but it probably helps a whole *hell* of a lot. :) B

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process)

2000-08-06 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard=22?=
> "Chris" == Chris Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Chris> On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Jim Ziegler wrote: >> So out with Kernigan and Ritchie, they had no scanners so could not have >> had anything to contribute. (Please be sure to note that this is a >> comment on the arrogance

Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process)

2000-08-06 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard=22?=
> "Dale" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dale> On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Matthew Vernon wrote: >> Dale Scheetz writes: >> > It comes down to: Can you do "normal" things that may be >> > required by the task at hand? Scanning a passport seems to be >> > a reasonable