Dear Maintainer,
the LGPL section in your debian/copyright points to
/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2 ...
Thorsten
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian
Hi Samuel,
please note in your debian/copyright that
printer-driver-indexbraille/filter/index-direct-braille.c
is only GPL3+
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
conc
an opt-out, too.)
Thank you very much.
Thorsten Alteholz,
on behalf of the Debian LTS team.
PS: A member of the LTS team might start working on this update at
any point in time. You can verify whether someone is registered
on this update in this file:
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/secure-t
Package: ghostscript
Severity: important
Tags: security
Hi,
the following vulnerability was published for ghostscript.
CVE-2017-6196[0]:
| Multiple use-after-free vulnerabilities in the gx_image_enum_begin
| function in base/gxipixel.c in Ghostscript before
| ecceafe3abba2714ef9b432035fe0739d9b
iew and/or test the updated package before it gets released.
You can also opt-out from receiving future similar emails in your
answer and then the LTS Team will take care of ghostscript updates
for the LTS releases.
Thank you very much.
Thorsten Alteholz,
on behalf of the Debian LTS team.
PS: A
or the LTS releases.
Thank you very much.
Thorsten Alteholz,
on behalf of the Debian LTS team.
PS: A member of the LTS team might start working on this update at
any point in time. You can verify whether someone is registered
on this update in this file:
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/secure-te
Hi Didier,
I marked the package for ACCEPT, but please also mention Apple as copyright
holder.
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi Didier,
I marked your package for ACCEPT, but please also add the exception mentioned
in LICENSE to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi Jose,
thanks a lot for reporting bug #931947 for package printer-driver-brlaser.
Meanwhile two new versions of the software have been uploaded. As you
reported that this bug has been fixed by upstream, we can probably close
this bug..
Can you please confirm that the current version of pri
Hi Holger,
On Sun, 10 Oct 2021, Holger Wolf wrote:
When will this no change finally arrive at Debian? The patch is not yet
included in the package version 1.6-2.
do you mind telling me the bug number in the Debian BTS for this issue?
What do you mean by "no change"?
regards
Thorsten
Hi Davide,
thanks a lot for your report.
Unfortunately upstream released version 1.4.0.5 within the tarball of
version 1.4.0.
As Debian is guided by the version of the tarball, the version of the
package seems to be outdated. But the changes for 1.4.0.5 are already part
of the 1.4.0 package.
Hi Till,
thanks a lot for the patches. Updated package should be available now.
Thorsten
Hi Pavel,
On Sat, 30 Oct 2021, Pavel wrote:
The version appears to be 4-1.
where did you get this information from?
According to [1] the current version in the latest stable release of
Debian, called Bullseye, is 6.1. Versin 6.2 was uploaded beginning of
September to Debian unstable.
Tho
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Troy,
thanks for your bugreport. Unfortunately I have problems understanding
what is going on.
How can HPLIP link to a missing libhpdiscovery.so.
I assume you are building the package in a minimal chroot. How can there
be an old version of libhpdiscovery.so availa
Hi Kurt and Patrik,
thanks a lot for your reports. Can you please check whether the problem
still exists after a few new upstream versions?
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi Laurent,
thanks a lot for your report. Can you please check whether the problem
exists after a few new upstream versions?
However, the ppd file was provided by Epson, so there has to be a reason
why they didn't use the maximum resolution in it.
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi George,
can you please check whether the problem exists after a few new upstream
version?
Probably the upstream report from you and Brian had been a success.
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi Eric,
On 29.03.22 18:36, Eric Valette wrote:
Hplip is not mentionned in the python 3.10-add transition but is still not
installable with
python3.10 default.
I seem to have missed something here. What did you mean by this bug report?
Thorsten
On 29.05.22 17:45, Dennis G wrote:
recently there was update for cups
after that
I can not print from console or from atril
My crystal ball says that you might want to add "root" to "SystemGroup"
in "/etc/cups/cups-files.conf"
Thorsten
Hi Francesco,
On 13.06.22 16:56, Francesco Galasso wrote:
We were interested to know whether you intend to integrate drivers for
the Dymo 550 series and whether you have a hypothetical release date.
in case of printer-driver-dymo we don't develop the software on our own
but just take the soft
Hi Till,
On 11.08.22 20:07, Till Kamppeter wrote:
could you update the Debian package of HPLIP to the newest version
(3.22.6?)?
I did now and had to add a new patch due to stricter checks of gcc12 as
well.
Thorsten
Hi Brian,
On 15.08.22 18:03, Brian Potkin wrote:
cups was updated on my unstable machine a few days ago. changelog.Debian
hasn't any details about it. Am I missing something?
changelog.Debian contains only changes for the source package.
+b1 means it was a binary NMU and the changelog entry is
Hi everybody,
from my point of view it totally makes sense, when you install a printer
driver to print files on braille printers, that this software does what
it is supposed to do.
The problem seems to be that it was installed on a system without need
for it. Wouldn't there be a better packa
Hi,
On 04.12.22 18:53, Boyuan Yang wrote:
Any update on this patch?
I intend to do several bug fixing uploads for the debian-printing
packages during my Christmas break. So please be patient a little bit
longer.
Thorsten
Hi Christoph,
On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, Christoph Biedl wrote:
2. Allow co-existence by renaming legacy libppd
(...)
Biggest concert for me: An updated legacy src:libppd would have to go
through NEW, nodoby knows how long that will take.
oh, this should be easy: if I know of the new upload, the
Hi Till,
On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Now one question: Could we implement (2) already in the current Debian
release (the one which freezes in a few weeks) or do we have to stay with
cups-filters 1.x there and do all the changes only after that release so that
they are in place o
On 30.12.22 16:24, Till Kamppeter wrote:
I will prepare the package right now ... The actual upload needs to
get sponsored, as I am not a Debian Developer. Thorsten could most
probably do this. Once in Debian, we will sync into Ubuntu.
Sure, I will do this (after Bookworm :-)).
Neverthele
Hi Till,
On 11.01.23 21:14, Till Kamppeter wrote:
thank you very much for your inclusion of the Common Print Dialog
Backends packages in Debian.
sure, anytime!
For all of these there is a new generation (2.0b1) available upstream
now and cpdb-libs and cpdb-backend-file would be easy to upda
Hi Till,
On 15.01.23 23:45, Till Kamppeter wrote:
We could even kick off the introduction of the New Architecture on the
DebConf in India ...
oh, I am afraid I won't attend this DebConf ...
You could perhaps do uploads of the New Architecture stuff into
Experimental to get some more test
Hi Till,
On 13.02.23 11:44, Till Kamppeter wrote:
For me this means that Jonas has dropped maintainership of this
package. Am I right?
yes, you are right.
Thorsten, as Ghostscript is mainly used for printing (rasterizing PDF,
converting PDF to PostScript), it would be great if you could
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Currently, the delta is the following:
- New re-packaging of Ghostscript 10.00.0, keeping the leptonica and
tesseract convenience copies in as they are not in Ubuntu Main.
Added appropriate remark to debian/copyright.
(...)
Oh, I ha
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Brian Potkin wrote:
I have seen this and had hoped that somebody else steps up to maintain
ghostscript. As nobody seems to be interested, yes, the package should be
part of the Printing Team.
Ghostscript is already handled by the Team.
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Pri
Hi Peter,
is your printer listed when you do: escputil -M
At least in version 5.3.3 it is so maybe you just need to upgrade?
Best regards,
Thorsten
Hi Jakob,
I am not sure that I understand the problem:
Starting with a fresh system:
root@sid:~# LANG=C dpkg -l "*pappl*"|grep pappl
dpkg-query: no packages found matching *pappl*
root@sid:~# LANG=C dpkg -l "*avahi*"|grep avahi
un avahi-autoipd(no description available)
un
Hi Jakob,
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Jakob Haufe wrote:
Yes, but this doesn't work for me. See attached log.
from the changelog of pkgconf:
pkgconf (1.8.1-1) unstable; urgency=high
* Apply an upstream patch to validate the dependency graph when --exists
is specified (Closes: #1026781).
and
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
Any chance that you could patch this downstream? It doesn't look like
upstream has any interest in fixing this.
I think so, there will be an upload in the next days ...
Thorsten
Hi Michael,
thanks for your bug report.
What makes you think that hplip is broken instead of hp-check?
For example in "General Dependencies" packages cups-devel and cups-image
are required. Both do not exist. Though this has been reported several
times, HP does not want to change this.
This
Hi Helge,
On 10.03.23 12:14, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Extra great would be, if could you send the updated de.po, fr.po and
pt.po to the previous translators asking for input (I can do this, if
you want)
it would be great if you could do this for me.
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi Helge,
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
What ETA would you like me to send, i.e. when would the upload happen?
I don't have any further plans with the package. As long as there is no
new RC bug, I will upload when you are ready.
Thorsten
Hi Helge,
On 25.03.23 08:04, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Is there anything you need from my side for this upload left?
just a bit patience ...
I "adopted" the package, so I am also facing the same problems with the
magic translation handling as you ...
Indeed. I can then request the unbloc
Hi Till,
On Wed, 31 May 2023, Till Kamppeter wrote:
I do not know how far the Bookworm release process has progressed and whether
the new development cycle has already started.
the release is planned on 2023-06-10 and afterwards the fun may begin
again.
For the New Architecture for printi
On 16.09.23 14:29, Christoph Biedl wrote:
One of the questions that I couldn't ask since we were already behind
schedule: Assuming the next Debian release (~2025) will no longer ship
cups2 at all, how does does affect the existing ecosystem around PPD? I
might be wrong but I got the impression se
Hi Christian,
On 30.09.23 19:02, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
I did not find this file (because I don't have a full install), but I think
the filename should be cupsd.conf instead of cupds.conf.
oops, thanks for telling. You are right, the correct name would have
been cupsd.conf
Thorsten
On 07.11.23 17:55, Debian wrote:
Is it possible to get somewhere the packages before the upgrade?
https://snapshot.debian.org/ might help you.
Hi Chris,
thanks a lot for the debdiff.
On 03.12.23 15:37, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
yes, please let me do the upload by myself. I would like to do it this
weekend.
Thorsten
Hi Steven,
On 22.12.23 18:47, Steven Robbins wrote:
I noticed recently that ghostscript has been orphaned and decided I'll
volunteer to be maintainer.
great, so I can remove an item from my agenda :-).
>From the wiki site, I can see that ghostscript is listed as team maintained.
However, the
Hi Steven,
On Tue, 26 Dec 2023, Steven Robbins wrote:
I definitely don't mean to step on toes!
oh, no, don't get me wrong. I am very glad that I don't have to adpot
ghostscript by myself! It belongs to the debian-printing team but I didn't
find some spare time to take care of it yet. So ple
Hi Steven,
On Sat, 6 Jan 2024, Steven Robbins wrote:
To me, it seems that this should just be completely removed from Debian.
I'll file a removal bug unless there are objections?
even I don't see a bright future of this package, so please file a bug and
it will be buried.
Thorsten
Hi Till,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Thorsten, would you introduce the packages cpdb-libs and cpdb-backend-cups
(they are both from OpenPrinting) into Debian? You can use the Ubuntu
packages as base for that, as they are already in Ubuntu and tested there.
cpdb-libs is already
Hi Till,
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Are there plans for further updates? Or plans for abandoning HPLIP in Debian?
the update is on my agenda for March. I definitely do not plan to abandon
the package.
Thorsten
Hi Steve,
On 20.04.24 17:28, Steven Robbins wrote:
I closed the Salsa repo and tried my usual "gpb buildpackage" routine. To my
surprise that resulted in an error about uncommitted changes in the source
tree. So I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong?
I am doing basically the same at the
Package: cups-browsed
Hi Mike,
unfortunately this is a feature and not a bug.
As cups-browsed only Recommends: avahi-daemon, it might not be installed
and you can not require to wait for its start. As far as I know systemd
has some kind of timeout and the system will still boot when avahi-dae
Hi Chris,
thanks for preparing the upload.
From my point of view the change in debian/NEWS is not correct. If at
all there could have been a new entry for this upload, but I don't think
this change is that important to explicitly inform all users.
Anyway, I just uploaded 20200505dfsg0-3 now .
Hi Chris,
thanks for the patch, I will do the upload myself.
Thorsten
Hi Alain,
did you upgrade cups or was it a new installation?
Can you please check whether it works with version 2.4.7-3 and/or 2.4.7-1.2?
Thorsten
Hi Michael,
On 18.06.24 14:19, Michael Biebl wrote:
any chance you could consider this MR in your next upload?
yes, thanks for the MR. I will apply it after the migration of 2.4.7-3.
Thorsten
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024, Michael Biebl wrote:
Adding Thorsten explicitly to CC just in case he is not subscribed to the bug
mail.
Thanks and sorry, I promise, ipp-usb will be my next upload.
Thorsten
Hi Marcin,
cups now makes more checks with the attributes it gets from the printer,
so it would be great to know which printer you are using. Are there any
messages in the error log on host A or host B? Are you still able to
print on host A?
Are you able to try a different printer (maybe even
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, John Scott wrote:
I have a question as a random passerby.
Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
libcupsfilters2-common is part of the new CUPSv3 family of packages, but this
is far from being ready to use.
Nowadays nobody should use libcupsfilters2 at all.
If libcupsfilters2 is
Hi,
there won't be any transition from cups-filters 1.x to cups-filters 2.x.
For whatever reason upstream decided to rename cups-filters to
libcupsfilters2.
libcupsfilters2 belongs to the CUPSv3 family of packages. These packages
are far from being usable at all, so nothing external should d
Hi Thomas,
libcupsfilters2-common is part of the new CUPSv3 family of packages, but
this is far from being ready to use.
Nowadays nobody should use libcupsfilters2 at all. I have no idea why
gnome depends on it.
As cups-filters belongs to the cupsv2 familiy, the Break: is totally fine.
Th
Hi Daniel,
On 10.10.24 09:22, Daniel Lewart wrote:
I find it confusing that libcupsfilters2-common is v3, not v2!
I agree, but this is upstreams numbering.
So the problematic package appears to be:
* Package: cpdb-backend-cups
* Maintainer: Thorsten Alteholz
* Depends
Hi Sebastian,
On 10.09.24 11:56, Sebastian Humenda wrote:
The issue is still present in Trixie. Has upstream not yet applied the patch
or downstream not yet the latest version?
upstream did not yet add this patch to a cups-filters 1.x release, which
would work together with cups 2.x.
Maybe t
Hi Marcin,
On 04.10.24 13:52, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Indeed, on host B the following appears at the same time the print
dialog hangs in evince ("piec" is host A):
E [04/Oct/2024:13:29:44 +0200] HP_Smart_Tank_710_720_series_piec:
Printer returned invalid data: \"media-supported\": Bad keyword v
Hi Faidon,
On 21.10.24 11:47, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
What are you intentions with regards to this patch?
hplip is on top of my TODO list now and I will upload it this week.
Thorsten
Hi Till,
On 10.10.24 20:11, Till Kamppeter wrote:
the new generation of cups-filters (2.x), split into libcupsfilters,
libppd, cups-filters, and cups-browsed, each of version 2.x, is not
part of CUPS 3.x. They are designed to work with BOTH CUPS 2.x and
CUPS 3.x. They detect the presence of
On Tue, 1 Oct 2024, Murray, Ronald-1 (A&F) wrote:
Perhaps you should simply reassign the bug to the cups-browsed package instead?
No, in the Debian bug tracker you assign a bug to a source package and
there is no source package "cups-browsed" in Debian. There is a binary
package "cups-bro
Hi Petter,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2024, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I believe the following patch solve the build problems for hplib in
unstable.
Thanks a lot for the patch!
Thorsten
Hi Till,
On 06.02.25 18:42, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Are there any special reasons?
sure, the patches were already available as merge requests and I didn't
want to just ditch the work of others. The next step will be the upgrade
to the new version.
Thorsten
Hi Agustin,
thanks a lot for taking care of this1
@Marcin: did you try the patch from Agustin and does it help with your
problem?
Thorsten
Hi Jay,
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I've uploaded qpdf 12.0.0 to debian unstable, which means the packages
python3-pikepdf, cups-filters, and r-cran-qpdf will need to relink. There are
some breaking changes in qpdf 12, but they are minor and hopefully won't impact
any of the ab
Hi,
is there any bug resulting from these file permissions? Is there something
not working?
Thorsten
72 matches
Mail list logo
