On 14/02/2023 00:01, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Oh, I have to admit I have no clue what this means :-).
But in case leptonica is related to leptonlib, keeping the convenience
copy is a very bad thing as leptonlib is affected by lots of CVEs.
The same seems to happen with tesseract ...
And please
On 13/02/2023 23:46, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
This is just some Wiki page. Before Jonas orphanded the package, the
Maintainer: was set to the Debian Printing Team but the repository was
still in the Debian-namespace.
Now, the Maintainer: is set to the QA team and just this Wiki page
mentions th
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Currently, the delta is the following:
- New re-packaging of Ghostscript 10.00.0, keeping the leptonica and
tesseract convenience copies in as they are not in Ubuntu Main.
Added appropriate remark to debian/copyright.
(...)
Oh, I ha
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023, Brian Potkin wrote:
I have seen this and had hoped that somebody else steps up to maintain
ghostscript. As nobody seems to be interested, yes, the package should be
part of the Printing Team.
Ghostscript is already handled by the Team.
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Pri
On 13/02/2023 19:30, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Hi Till,
On 13.02.23 11:44, Till Kamppeter wrote:
For me this means that Jonas has dropped maintainership of this
package. Am I right?
yes, you are right.
Thorsten, as Ghostscript is mainly used for printing (rasterizing PDF,
converting PDF
Hi Till,
On 13.02.23 11:44, Till Kamppeter wrote:
For me this means that Jonas has dropped maintainership of this
package. Am I right?
yes, you are right.
Thorsten, as Ghostscript is mainly used for printing (rasterizing PDF,
converting PDF to PostScript), it would be great if you could
Hi,
I have looked into the Debian package of Ghostscript 10.00.0 now and
seen the following in its changelog:
--
ghostscript (10.0.0~dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* orphan package: set maintainer to Debian QA Group
-- Jonas Smedegaard Mon, 24 Oct 2022 13:54:55 +0200
