On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:50:58PM +, Mark Benson wrote:
> Another simple question.
>
> Is Linux (Debian or otherwise) compatible with the GXT6500P graphics card?
>
> I have one that I have tested as working in AIX 5L on the 9111-285 and it
> appears to be 100% working. Booting any Linux dist
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:39:51PM +, Mark Benson wrote:
> I finally got a bootable Debian 6.0.3 system. It's a good start!
>
> I now find myself stuck in another hole.
>
> Xorg doesn't like either my GXT6500P or my GXT135P graphics boards. It
> doesn't seem to have a driver for either.
>
>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:58:02PM +, Mark Benson wrote:
>
> On 23 Jan 2012, at 22:18, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:39:51PM +, Mark Benson wrote:
> >> I finally got a bootable Debian 6.0.3 system. It's a good start!
> >
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:06:26PM +0100, szukw...@arcor.de wrote:
> I have debian-6.0.3-ppc installed on a PowerMac G5.
>
> The graphics card used is a ATI Radeon 9600 AP (AGP)
> with one backward key(1.5V key).
>
> The board has one AGP slot; and 3 PCI slots (length ~125 mm).
>
> 1. Is it poss
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:58:40AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> For Radeons, that's only true for older cards without ATOM BIOS,
> basically anything older than Radeon X1xxx. So this shouldn't be a
> problem for a Radeon HD 5450, but there might be other issues, e.g. the
> drivers in the stable re
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:09:14PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> He was asking about a PCI card.
PCI and AGP. But not PCIe. Not too many options for PCI and AGP anymore.
> You're right, although with KMS, console will work as soon as the radeon
> kernel module is loaded (which can happen very e
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:12:33PM +0100, Stephane Louise wrote:
> I tried DVI and HDMI connectors. The only new dmesg that I have is:
> [drm:radeon_dvi_detect] *ERROR* HDMI-A-1: probed a monitor but no|invalid EDID
>
> That's the only time when you can actually see something wrong in
> dmesg (it
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:23:48PM +, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> (Not subscribed to debian-powerpc@, please CC to me/the bug report as
> appropriate).
>
> Can somebody please help to check if this bug from SDL libraries is
> still present on powerpc? I don't have access to any pow
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:26:57PM +, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Thank you so much for the quick help!
>
> 1.2.15 is fine, I wanted to confirm if this old bug was still present
> or fixed. I don't have interest in testing other versions of SDL in
> principle. BTW, maybe you can a
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:12:18AM -0700, John Wesley Cooper wrote:
> One of the first things I tried was the little "Press C at the chime" trick
> at which point the drive repeatedly tried to read the disk for a minute or
> so, then booted into Mac OS with no other visible or audible output.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:52:34AM -0700, John Wesley Cooper wrote:
> I do believe I specified in my initial message that I burnt it to a CD-R … so
> that can't be the issue.
I forgot what the initial message had said.
I would be surprised if it wasn't able to read CD-Rs in general (although
my
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 01:07:05PM +0100, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> Any mdadm one should apply.
> Your /boot might need to be outside of RAID though. AFAIK yaboot doesn't
> support booting of md RAID and I haven't tried GRUB on PPC.
Grub works fine on raid, although you will need a git checkout, not th
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 05:19:34PM +0200, Niels S. Eliasen wrote:
> Dó you have a cookbook for getting grub2 working(with the raid of course) ?
Well I can tell you what my setup is.
I am using an IBM p710 (and I also have a p520 with a very similar setup
although currently using a somewhat patche
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:18:50PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Well I can tell you what my setup is.
>
> I am using an IBM p710 (and I also have a p520 with a very similar setup
> although currently using a somewhat patched and manually installed via
> dd and other hacks th
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:42:32PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I am still a regular powerpc user, and I should have sufficient time to
> assist with porting issues for the foreseeable future, which I haven't
> done for the last couple of releases but will now be able to. So feel
> free to put me d
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:28:20AM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> Interesting question, as windows did once upon-a-time run on powerpc
> (wikipedia says so, so it must be true
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT#32-bit_platforms)
>
> Does someone need to run notepad for powerpc on linux thoug
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:39:37PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> But still POWER3 is supported by the 32-bit powerpc port:
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/powerpc/ch02s01.html.en#id522279
Debian powerpc is 32bit, but with 64bit kernel available. Debian 64bit
powerpc is a new proj
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:06:09AM -0700, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> First: try sending this to the "debian-powerpc" list. You may get
> more answers there...
>
> Second: I have a couple of G4 tower machines that work just fine,
> but unfortunately I don't have any powerbooks to try, s
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 01:15:36PM -0400, Bruno Gallichand wrote:
> I`m trying to revive an old IBM 43P for a customer into using it with
> Debian 3.0 (that`s the only version I was able to get bootable floppy images).
>
> After the successful partionning and installation of the base OS, duri
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:18:14PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I am getting mails from time to time "how can I help with the port I need new
> packages" or something like that but after I tell what there is to do I don't
> hear anything anymore. P2020 is still used in new designs and
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 07:25:27PM -0400, Logan Brown wrote:
> I would never recommend attempting a dist upgrade to unstable. I've
> tried it twice in the past, and both times led to reinstalling the
> from scratch. Dependencies get mixed up, and you're left with a highly
> unstable "bastardized" s
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:00:17PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> 8572 and P2020 are dual cores / SMP. They _are_ fast and support more than
> 4GiB of memory. They play in the performance league. MPC512x are the slow
> ones. I built the port on _one_ 8536 and the buildd was mostly wating
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 12:45:15PM -0800, Terrence van Ettinger wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there any way to get some form of Skype to run on Debian
> Squeeze? I have an iMac G4 from about 66 years ago that's a
> hand-me-down, and I really need access to Skype on it.
No hope. Skype doesn't do powe
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:47:49AM -0700, b...@riseup.net wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I have been struggling to boot Debian-PPC from a new 2TB Baracuda HDD with
> a Seagate GoFlex controller... FOR DAYS!
>
> I am using a Powerbook G4 with OSX 10.3.4
>
> The details:
>
> When I boot off a Live Ubu
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:21:36PM +0100, Niels S. Eliasen wrote:
> I do have a problem that I hope someone can help me with
>
> My old PC(Celeron chip) gave up just the other day.. and I have been
> struggling ever since to get the the mdadm (raid 1) mounted on my Debian
> linux...(both sys
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:40:16PM +0100, Niels Schjøtt Eliasen wrote:
> Hi Len
> And .. is it possible to upgrade the superblock ? (I fear the mdadm raid was
> created a couple of years back (in a Lenny installation))
According to
https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/RAID_superblock_formats#Co
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:26:04PM -0500, Brian Szymanski wrote:
> This makes me wonder... Since I'm using mdadm, I should be able to
> use any voltage-compatible card, provided that I first plug the card
> in on a PC and configure it for straight-thru non-RAID access to all
> drives, right? I'd ne
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:07:09AM +0800, Liang Guo wrote:
> I'm working to run Debian ppc64 ports on my xbox360 box, but
> failed to setup a chrooted environment with "Illegal instruction"
> error. After some dig on this problem, I found this is caused
> by PowerPC vector instrunctions, and accor
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 09:31:59PM +0900, Hiroyuki Yamamoto wrote:
> Hi, All.
> I am a ppc64 porter, Hiroyuki Yamamoto.
>
> Because ppc64 port is NOT a official port yet,
> please DON'T report to official BTS the bugs which have NOT a relation to the
> packages AT ALL,
> and which have a relation
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 08:01:08PM +0100, Michael Felt wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I downloaded the debian netinstaller - debian-6.0.7-powerpc-netinst.iso -
> and installed on a p505. The installation process goes well, but the boot
> fails.
>
> I tried using the LVM with multiple partitions and
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:56:00PM +0100, Michael Felt wrote:
> 4 to 5 years ago I was only able to get Linux to boot, (Redhat, Novell,
> Debian) unless it was a physical disk. I have not tried that yet because I
> do not have an empty disk to supply. And if that worked I would just
> uninstall it
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:29:17AM +0100, Michael Felt wrote:
> well in this case the newer machine must be the vios version (2.2.2.×)
> because my hardware is p5 generation.
>
> guess i'll just have to wait for the netboot respositories to update. i have
> waited "many moons" - what is a few mo
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:33:34AM +0100, Michael Felt wrote:
> upgrade? how? i am using netinst.iso to do the install, and what is installed
> does not boot!
>
> will try 2) when i have access. travelling/work keeps me away atm.
You could when at the end of the install, instead of finishing the
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:38:27PM +0100, Michael Felt wrote:
> It helps to read the screen -- oh, still no go -- but updated!
>
> Need to run the command ybin to update "something". I missed that bit of
> feedback firsttime.
>
> For comparison: when AIX boots it lists the device as:
> --
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:11:57PM +0300, Gasha wrote:
> I can get old IBM 7025-F50 box.
>
> Is there any chance to put any recent kernel on to it?
> I saw only reports to install debian 3.0 / sarge
>
> Are there any hidden problems?
Looking up the specs, I don't see any obvious reason it should
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 05:33:06PM +0300, Gasha wrote:
> I will try some debian installs on it.
> For some unknown reason, i like unix boxes :)
> So far i tried debian on HP 720, SUN 10, IBM p710 LPAR.
>
> I also have one INDY/MIPS, SUN BLADE 1000 waiting for linux.
> And nearby is one HP L2000 an
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:56:41PM +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote:
> I get an answer for my questions on the debian users list:
>
>
> Yes, udev in Wheezy requires a kernel >= 2.6.32 with the accept4(2)
> syscall. At least one year ago, the Squeeze kernel did not provide this
> particular syscall on pow
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:19:57PM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Brad Boyer wrote:
>
> > Was this input for an assembler or output from a disassembler? If this
> > is from a disassembly of a dynamically relocatable object, it might
> > have gotten confused by an instruction being the target
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:44:01AM +0800, Michael Felt wrote:
> Last march I started a thread - that with help - resolved the problem of
> installing from
> debian-6.0.7-powerpc-netinst.iso - and installed on a p505. downloading the
> new yaboot as part of the install (thanks to Lenn
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 07:11:18PM -0600, Thomas Carlson wrote:
> What are the correct apt sources for Debian Sarge these days? The old ones:
>
> deb http://archive.debian.org/debian/ sarge main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian/ sarge main contrib non-free
>
> no longe
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:26:39PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:46:21AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 07:11:18PM -0600, Thomas Carlson wrote:
> > > What are the correct apt sources for Debian Sarge these days? T
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:59:01PM +0800, Michael Felt wrote:
> Well, I tried the install again. ANd made a small change. The previous
> attempt was using a logical volume as the data area exported to the
> partition as hdisk0. I'll repeat that later - as a test. However, when
> installing to an is
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:39:13AM +0200, Alberto Mi wrote:
> hello, i have read the forums and some FAQs and i don't have found a way to
> make my geforce 4 mx on debian. Anyone could point me how to make it?
Does the nouveau driver not work on powerpc? I have no idea given I
have never tried it
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For powerpc, i386, amd64, armhf, I
- test most base packages on this architecture
- fix toolchain issues
- triage arch-specific bugs
- fix arch-related bugs
- run a loca
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Here is a little status update on the mails we have received so far.
> First off, thanks to all the porters who have already replied!
>
> So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
>
>hurd-i386
>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:19:24AM -0400, Federico Sologuren wrote:
> i have a HP Visualize B2000 that i managed to install last night from iso
> distribution that i found after a lot of looking. at this point only
> terminal is working. will keep reading to get debian up and running.
>
> i would
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 06:08:12PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> I suppose I'm not really one privileged to express these reactions,
> but I tend to be a loose cannon sometimes.
>
> ???
>
> (Checking my calendar. Nope, I haven't suddenly slipped back to the
> early 1990s.)
>
> (Still puzzled.)
Well
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 08:28:43AM -0700, Gary Driggs wrote:
> It's somewhat ironic that they're the last big fab & server vendor
> left making PPC gear. Even Freescale seems focused on ARM these
> days...
No, freescale is very much focused on powerpc, they are just doing some
arm as well since th
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 09:08:48AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> Ergo, there hasn't been sufficient support for least significant byte
> first mode to demonstrate that the CPU can actually do it. Makes more
> sense when I think about it that way.
Certainly running Linux this way is pretty new and unpr
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:52:31PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> Just for info:
>
> A-EON's Christmas Cracker! : Special offer on Nemo PowerPC
> Motherboards for the holiday season.
>
> To celebrate the latest delivery of Nemo PPC motherboards, A-EON
> Technology is pleased to announce a spe
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 03:07:39AM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> Dear people,
>
> Motivated by:
>
> * the results of the last call to porters
> * the fact that PowerPC (at least) used to be an architecture where Debian
> shined
> * the lack of external support (which means that we should help o
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 04:04:45PM -0800, Neko Ecchi wrote:
> Hi everyone. I'm not sure how active
> this list is, but I thought I'd give it a try
> to see if I can get my old K9 Blackdog
> running. For those who don't know, the
> K9 Blackdog is an old PPC computer
> that plugs into a regul
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:57:08AM -0800, Neko Ecchi wrote:
> Thanks, Lennart. I'll check out that source. I DO have access
> to the BlackDog SDK which runs on windows using QEMU that has GCC and
> will compile for my Virtex CPU. Sadly, I have no sources at all.
> They didn't ship the sou
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 03:27:52PM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:57:08AM -0800, Neko Ecchi wrote:
> > Thanks, Lennart. I'll check out that source. I DO have access
> > to the BlackDog SDK which runs on windows using QEMU that has GCC and
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:53:23AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> intrigeri wrote (20 Jan 2014 17:58:03 GMT) :
> >> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=89552
> > Sure. Debian porters, I'll let you subscribe to the RT ticket, and
> > hopefully take care of this porting problem.
>
> I'd like to se
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 11:57:16PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> in the discussion at
> https://github.com/andrewlow/v8ppc/issues/111
> comes the question about the minimum instruction set
> supported by debian-powerpc. I didn't find an answer
> in the documentation. Could you help me clarifying that
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:01:14AM +0300, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, I've been reading the info in those links myself,
> from what I understand the VMX128 opcodes are an extention, that is,
> they are added on top of the existing VMX opcodes, isn't that correct?
> If not
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:14:08AM +0100, peter green wrote:
> Another question the ftpmasters will likely have is what is the
> relationship between ppc64 and ppc64el. Is there hardware that will
> run ppc64 but not ppc64el? is there hardware that will run ppc64el
> but not ppc64? is there hardwar
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:48:13PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> Not in debian proper but it is on debian-ports.org and it appears to
> be pretty healthy.
Hmm, not listed under the official nor unofficial debian ports, while
ppc64el is.
https://www.debian.org/ports/
ppc64el listed, ppc64 is not.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:29:19PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm not sure what your point is.
>
> Maybe “crazy how ppc64 people got interested in getting their packages
> built as opposed to getting debian.org ports page updated”? Anyway, if
> you want to know about the port, see the wiki[1]
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 30.07.14, 13:05 Rick Thomas wrote:
> >Hi Keith,
> >
> >It’s definitely worth filing a bug. (See reportbug(1) for details on the
> >procedure.) I guess, for lack of anything more precise, you should file it
> >against packa
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 07:44:16AM -0400, David Gosselin wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Does this include 32-bit processors? The first link doesn't specify
> while the second appears to discuss 64-bit only.
It would certainly be 64bit only.
There is a lot of active
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 05:37:59PM +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 13.08.14 16:11, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >On 13.08.2014 20:23, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >>Does anybody know if this affects the Moto G[345] processors used in the
> >>Apple Macintosh machines?
> >>
> >>http://www.phoronix.com/scan.
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:29:50AM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> I see where powerpc support has been _removed_ from avian on Apr 30:
>
> https://github.com/ReadyTalk/avian/commit/41adb74eb1895c662920fdfb7467ce415d9fa0b7
>
> This would explain why it doesn't run for us. It looks like powerpc is a
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:41:21AM -0400, larry wrote:
> [2] And, since I haven't had access to a PPC machine for quite some
> time, maybe on some "plain" PPC as well?
>
>
> Linux Terpsicore 3.11-2-powerpc #1 Debian 3.11.10-1 (2013-12-04)
> One 7400, altivec supported PowerMac3,1 400MHz processor
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:11:21PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Thanks for testing. Yes, I finally removed the wrong heuristic for the
> memory some time ago.
>
> Regarding the bogomips: Could you send me the output for /proc/cpuinfo
> for this machine?
There is no bogomips in there. It is a
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 06:19:43PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I'm adding support for new architectures at the moment. powerpc is one
> of the most awkward existing arches to add boot support for at the
> moment, due to the mess of older machines. I'm hoping that ppc64el is
> better, but I don't
On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 03:48:27PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> OK, we will need a powerpc machine with more RAM available than the current
> powerpc porterbox.
>
> Debian PPC porters: can anyone build qtwebkit with a machine with at least
> 8GB
> of RAM+swap and the inc
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 10:36:56AM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> Current sid's qtwebkit (2.3.4.dfsg-2)
>
> ppc users says it crashes upon certain time (which seems to be not much).
> What
> I need is a proper backtrace generated with the patched qtwebkit.
>
> JFTR, qtwebk
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:09:10AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Compiling now.
>
> dpkg-source hates some of the patches in the package and refuses to
> unpack it. quilt is fine with it, and using quilt refresh on the patches
> makes dpkg-source happy. Seems using a/...
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:40:56AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 10:09:10AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > Compiling now.
> >
> > dpkg-source hates some of the patches in the package and refuses to
> > unpack it. quilt is fine with it,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:44:44PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to help on the ppc64 port, I have ppc32 hardware,
> ppc64/ppc64el remote VM accounts but no actual ppc64 hardware. I
> just lost an extremely low bid for an imac g5 on ebay and am short
> on cash for an
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:48:20PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> It should be quite faster, and the ppc notebook above will use an e6500,
> but that will have to wait for a while. In the meantime, I would be fine
> with a used iMac G5, I was almost going to get one minutes ago but I
> was
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:04:58AM -0600, Herminio Hernandez, Jr. wrote:
> I am having issues printing to my brother printer. I can add it as a
> network printer but the recommended drivers is for a mfc 6550mc printer not
> 640cw. When I print a test page I see it connect and successfully send the
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 07:16:50AM -0600, Sandeep G.R wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Sandeep G.R wrote:
> >
> > > I have a sid PPC64 from http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-ports running on
> > > Freescale Powerpc. Is their PPC64(Big
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 08:45:50PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Sorry for jumping in. I would like the chance to complement and clarify
> some things about ppc64el platform.
>
> As Aurelien pointed out, when used in OPAL mode, the system will boot a
> system running petitboot, whi
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:26:51AM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Well, bare metal has been mistakenly used to describe what I would call
> dedicated partition of single partition mode. People may call it bare
> metal, because there is no virtualized IO (in fact, there is the
> conso
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:37:42PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Holger Wansing, le Sat 11 Apr 2015 17:13:06 +0200, a écrit :
> > > +arch_porturl="ppc64el"
> > > +arch_listname="ppc64el"
> >
> > Please take care when updating these to be sure to understand
> >
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:58:38PM +0200, Michael Felt wrote:
> 10 days late replying - my apologies.
> PowerPC - if I read that in a literal sense - is that basically "oldish"
> Macs that were build on the PowerPC processor. If the answer is yes, is
> there any interest in the Ubuntu Community to
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 06:28:00PM +0530, Sureshvs wrote:
>We have embedded system with MPC8641D PowerPC processor,running Linux
> kernel 3.10.32 on eldk 5.3 filesystem.
> we are planning to use the debian filesystem on Linux kernel 3.10.32.
>
> I have gone through the debian website for Po
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 08:59:19AM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> Dear PPC porter people,
>
> The major Mono version pending in experimental fixes GCC5 and fixes
> reproducible builds and a dozen other bugs, so I don't want to delay it.
>
> It doesn't build on PowerPC any more, and nobody upstream is
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:10:34PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
>
>
> On 24/08/15 22:49, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 08:59:19AM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> >>Dear PPC porter people,
> >>
> >>The major Mono version pending in experime
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 03:06:21PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
>
>
> On 25/08/15 14:44, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > I did that, and got a ton of other errors.
> >
> > The readme file said to use:
> >
> > make get-monolite-latest
> > make E
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:09:58AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> OK, I was just trying what README.md said to do when using the get
> monolite option.
>
> I also just noticed I hadn't installed all the dependancies listed on
> http://www.mono-project.com/docs/compiling-m
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:31AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:09:58AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > OK, I was just trying what README.md said to do when using the get
> > monolite option.
> >
> > I also just noticed I hadn'
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:45:54PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
>
>
> On 25/08/15 16:34, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:31AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:09:58AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >>>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:46:41AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:45:54PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 25/08/15 16:34, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:53:31AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > &
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:50:46AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:46:41AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:45:54PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 25/08/15 16:34, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
&
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 09:28:50PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> Okay, now I'm confused? The point of that branch was it was the
> almost-working state, the compiler was one of the things not working
> properly! Let me try building from the branch afresh...
Well if you want me to do a fresh pull agai
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:16:15PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
>
>
> On 25/08/15 22:01, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 09:28:50PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> >> Okay, now I'm confused? The point of that branch was it was the
> >> almost-work
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:30:45PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> On 25/08/15 22:29, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > I had thought that could be it too. I certainly haven't seen that
> > particular problem so far. Are you simply running make or are you
> > passing any arguments t
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 05:54:10PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:30:45PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> > On 25/08/15 22:29, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > I had thought that could be it too. I certainly haven't seen that
> > > particula
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:45:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 05:54:10PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:30:45PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> > > On 25/08/15 22:29, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > > I had t
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:16:14PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:45:24AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 05:54:10PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:30:45PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> &g
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:28:28PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
>
>
> On 26/08/15 17:16, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > And a patch that fixes that (since the double's stored in the table are
> > little endian, they have to be endian swapped before being returne
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:40:15PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
>
>
> On 26/08/15 17:26, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >
> > And running the test suite as NOT root solved that. So now the only
> > problem I see left in 'make mcs-do-tests' is getting stuck fo
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 01:47:09PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> Well M=0 did no difference.
>
> I added -labels to the nunit-console.exe arguments which made it print
> each test name before running it to the output file and that allowed me
> to determine
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
>
>
> On 26/08/15 18:47, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >Opcode 'move_f_to_i4' missing from machine description file.
> >
>
> I agree with its assessment, there's no OP_MOVE_F_TO_I4 in
> mono/min
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:05:30PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
>
>
> On 26/08/15 20:12, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> >>
> >>On 26/08/15 18:47, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> >>>Opcode 'm
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 05:14:55PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:05:30PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26/08/15 20:12, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> > >On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Jo Shields wrote:
> > >>
201 - 300 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
