clude *-hurd-i386/ --exclude *-mipsel/
>--exclude *-powerpc/ --exclude *-arm/
Seems like explicitly including rather than explicitly excluding would
be more robust ...
[Mail follow-up set to debian-user only.]
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; <0>Rebooting in 180 seconds...
>
> Maybe something wrong with the initrd? Or the new 2.6.17 kernel?
Actually it was a debian-cd bug. Should be fixed now, thanks (and thanks
to Frans for noticing the problem after I'd given up in puzzlement upon
fin
uilt-in Linux kernel. We had to
compromise somewhat due to the current kernel and the kboot code we had
available not being friends.)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Hmm, let's use my Ubuntu hat for this mail ...]
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 03:45:28PM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:51:39PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I am interested to know what specifically you think is wrong with
> > Ubuntu's PS3 packagi
the "source package" contains compiled i386
binaries. I think you're out of luck for this on powerpc.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it.
I'd be interested in hearing how it goes: I'm planning to do exactly the
same thing when my PowerBook G4 15" arrives early next month, and will
be trying out debian-installer and perhaps an LVM install.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the installer from
some of the floppy-disk size constraints which previously plagued it.
> Oh, BTW, how exactly is a udeb different from a regular deb package?
udebs don't have to follow policy. For instance, they don't contain
documentation or man pages for reasons of space.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel alias is
> "linux" type "linux 2".
> You'll end up at a console.
Runlevel 2 is the default runlevel so 'linux 2' won't make any
difference. Runlevel 1, yes.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:29:04AM -0500, Joshua Narins wrote:
> Isn't there some smart debian person who could figure out where this
> is coming from?
An awful lot of random infected Windows machines, I strongly suspect.
There Is No Cabal.
Cheers,
--
C
running an autobuilder, but I do have a freshly installed
powerpc system, so I've been playing build-monkey for Joey's fixes on
IRC today. The situation's improving.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 05:25:02PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:24:26PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > debian-powerpc:
> >
> > My plan is to only have the debian-installer package list i386 and
> > powerpc as its architectures at first, and a
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:25:25PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 13:01:25 +
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If this is a new aluminium PowerBook, the folks on #debianppc informed
> > me that I had to run 2.6 in order for X to work
components ahave
> started trickling down to testing, so, who knows, maybe we'll have the
> full 2.4 in Sarge before the big Debian 3.1 release.
That looks likely, yes. There are a number of things we need to update
that now require it.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:21:04PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:48:18PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > I recommend it. However, it looks like Gnome 2.4 components have
> > > started tr
it ran perfectly
on my 15" AlBook.
Hope that helps ...
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 08:13:35PM +1030, Ryan Verner wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 20:01, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 03:33:34PM +0930, Ryan Verner wrote:
> > > Any other tips, XFree86 related or not, from other Albook users would
> > >
ngs for other languages (see the
changelog entry for debconf 0.3.74).
My impression is that these days maintainer scripts are much better
about not mixing up debconf interaction with normal use of stdout, and
so it's still possible that the fd 3 hack will be removed some day.
--
Colin Watson
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:43:19AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:30:26PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Notice that the debconf helper scripts provide stdout on &3, so any
> >
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:51:00AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:30:26PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 05:03:17PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Notice that the debconf helper scripts provide stdout on &3, so any
> >
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> - various old-world issues, including the work to free miboot, and inclusion
> of the free miboot version into the official archive. Mmm, i hope Colin
> Watson doesn't forget to add miboot support to his da
volunteered,
and the relevant bits of code have been switched over to look at my
daily builds.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be able to use it.
All sounds very plausible, due to the switch to udev. I'm happy to
install a workaround in mountfloppy for this, but I have no idea how to
detect from userspace that swim3 is being used and that the device
should therefore be created. Can anyone help?
--
Colin Watson
comment out the broken bits in debian-cd for the
time being, although that will probably break chrp and prep which would
not be good, so I hope I won't need to.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed it was a
problem until aj drew my attention to it.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:17:26PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:34:00PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:39:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > The debian installer netinst and businesscard images are now broken since
&g
ays ago, and I was just emerging from under a different pile
of work so I had some time to look at it anyway. Failures in the d-i
build logs don't go unnoticed, although I agree that this one took
longer to fix than it should have done.
--
Colin Watson [EMAI
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:57:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:31:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I've upgraded to current unstable now and will upload all the bits as
> > soon as I can; I'm suffering from ISP routing brokenness today whi
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:07:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:16:15PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > debian-cd changes I committed over the last hour or two. I hadn't been
> > paying attention to CD build logs; I'll know to do so in the future.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 01:24:56AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:15:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:44:37AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > the d-i isos are broken, and had i not been there, they will probably have
>
le to test them myself.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
FYI, the daily sid_d-i CD builds are working again for powerpc. Sorry
for the long hiatus here! Among other things, those of you with tg3
network cards should be able to use these.
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:58:06PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 5/3/06, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >FYI, the daily sid_d-i CD builds are working again for powerpc. Sorry
> >for the long hiatus here! Among other things, those of you with tg3
> >network
eport about catdoc 0.91.4-5 on powerpc.)
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t in the middle?
>
> Real UNIX systems don't do that anymore.
Do feel free to resize your terminal before running 'man' and watch the
man page resize itself. Also, last I looked, groff was less brain-dead
about justification than that.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
accept ssh X forwarding I can't do any significant amount of debugging.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apparently groff 1.15.2-3 is going to be accepted for Debian 2.2r5. I've
built it for i386 and sparc, but I'd appreciate it if the other four
stable architectures could also build this version.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stable | source, alpha, arm, i386, m68k,
powerpc, sparc
groff | 1.15.2-3 | proposed-updates | source, i386
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.0-5 | testing | powerpc
pgp5i | 5.0-5 | unstable | powerpc
pgp5i | 5.0-7 | testing | source, alpha, arm, i386, sparc
pgp5i | 5.0-7 | unstable | alpha, arm
pgp5i | 5.0-8 | unstable | source, i386, m68k, s390
Thanks,
--
Co
or almost a full second at each
> _newselect() call (the below occurs 21 times for a nonexistent man page):
This looks like it might be #137908. I'd appreciate help on this - it
seems to be powerpc-specific.
--
Colin Watson (man-db maintainer) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSC
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 05:16:40AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 10:40:06PM -0500, Brian Victor wrote:
> > My "man" command takes an inordinately long time to run:
> >
> > %time man foo
> > No manual entry for foo
> > man foo
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 07:37:44AM -0500, Brian Victor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 05:34:27AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote:
> >I've tried it on a powerpc now (thanks, Adam Conrad) and couldn't
> >reproduce the problem there either. In fact, on that machine I don't
is installed setuid, any user can just run
mandb, no need for root privileges ...
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 03:25:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:11:39PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > It still might be worth a bug; the postinst only builds the database
> > on fresh installs if man-db is not installed setuid. I don't
> > u
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 07:54:46PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 03:34:37AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I've just remembered why things are done that way in the first place.
> > See #100616, which caused problems for the boot-floppies. I'll see
ropriate for man, I've implemented a
workaround that manually ignores any zero-length databases.
If /var/cache/man/oldlocal/index.bt is still zero-length, then you can
work around this for now by just removing it.
Sorry for the delay in figuring this out.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 09:56:14PM +0300, Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> It would be nice if yaboot supported splash.
> Does it?
Not the isolinux kind of splash image that I believe you're asking
about, no.
> If not, is there anybody working on this?
Not to my knowledge.
Cheers,
--
as I can gather
from IRC conversation). I believe the question was about displaying an
image at the yaboot prompt itself, which would need to be implemented in
yaboot itself and isn't.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
trying to
load an initrd.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 04:32:12PM +0300, Eddy Petrisor wrote:
> On 5/20/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:52:26PM -0700, Brian Benson wrote:
> > > I've used both bootsplash and gensplash on my ibook. Yaboot just
> &g
to argue).
I understood that we needed gcc 3.4 in order to get powerpc TLS support?
That doesn't seem like a no-brainer from a release management
perspective to me, but maybe I was misinformed ...
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 09:37:34AM +0900, Sean Schertell wrote:
> Hmm... ya got me. Anyone else know where the list of mirrors is?
http://www.debian.org/mirror/list
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ory
That's a bug in smtpd; please file it. ld-linux.so.2 is not called that
on all architectures.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-installer?
(http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer)
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
directions I gave in
http://bugs.debian.org/252425? Use nano as the editor, and note that you
must make the change between the time when man-db is extracted and when
it's configured (watch tty3 for the dpkg output so that you know when to
do this).
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ection, and
then mess around on tty2. That way, you could mount the target root
filesystem and see what kernel it has on it.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 09:44:58AM +0900, Jerome Walter wrote:
> As we are to deal with the question: how to make a kernel including the
> initrd ?
mkvmlinuz
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;t be in the "sarge_d-i" ==
"daily" builds yet. Either of the images in
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/powerpc/20040622/
ought to work.
Installation reports, successful or otherwise, gratefully appreciated.
Please make sure you say from exactly which URL you downloaded the
image.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n the archive do include an SMP kernel,
which we currently aren't using. Is it safe to use this for all power4
systems?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:17:33AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:05:39PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Can you try booting with install-power4-2.6?
> >
> > The 2.6.6 kernel image builds in the archive do include an SMP kernel,
> > which we cu
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 05:54:40PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Colin Watson writes:
> > Either of the images in
> > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/powerpc/20040622/
> > ought to work.
> >
> > Installation reports, successful or otherwis
s only the default
post-first-reboot if you booted the installer with video=ofonly.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hold down Cmd-Opt-O-F while the system boots, then at the OpenFirmware
prompt type 'boot hd:9,\\yaboot' (assuming that yaboot is installed on
/dev/hda9; if not, adjust as appropriate). Then boot into Linux as usual
and run ybin.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
terday and I
checked in a fix. I've just uploaded usb-discover 0.18 which should fix
this when it makes it into CD images.
> install-power4 leads to the floppy problem.
That was a problem with the initrd builds. It should be fixed now, so
the next sid_d-i build should have it fixed.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:20:38AM -0700, Brian wrote:
> --- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is therm_pm72 essential to the installation?
>
> Technically no. But in my opinion, yes!!
As Jens said, it's built into the 2.6 kernels. I assume nothing special
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 02:33:18PM -0600, Nick Golder wrote:
> On 2004-06-11 20:17 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:10:23AM -0600, Nick Golder wrote:
> > > I am using Test Candidate 1 for PowerPC and am installing on a Power Mac
> > > G4 350M
uppose ...
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
go
stable); more complex.
Do any kernel hackers have an opinion here?
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7;t compatible in the way
that -386, -686, etc. are.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r some time and in my
experience work well.
> Ah, and i am seriously considering dropping support for apus from the
> kernels (and thus debian-installer).
Amen!
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 03:52:40PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:32:43PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > worth noting that no release candidate version of d-i has yet had
> > working support for 2.6 on powerpc (test candidate 1 would have done but
> > r
otloader for initrd. I went to google, but couldn't find
> anything that made sense to me. Can anyone tell me how to do this?
> Thanks.
Use stanzas like this:
image=/vmlinux
label=Linux
read-only
initrd=/initrd.img
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
formats all the
> partitions that need it, checks the swap, and then locks up completely.
Can you see what it's doing using 'ps x'?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
try the sid_d-i
image dated 20040707 when it appears, I'd appreciate it.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:19:24AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 10:30:49PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 05:28:26AM -0700, Brad Boyer wrote:
> > > Older 2.6 installs fail with the serial driver problem, and while
> > > th
dern builds are fixed.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
temperature." quotation from [1])
>
> Now, if the cooling system is controlled by the os and not by the
> hardware itself, won't there be some obstacles on getting debian or any
> other distribution working on that machine?
Isn't this what the therm_pm72 module takes care
rnel issue somehow.
>
> Is there some way to kinda single-step through d-i?
Stick sleeps throughout the partman scripts? :-)
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
talled the 2.7 kernel which has the same problem and to
> make things worse, typing old now causes the 2.6.6 kernel to boot and
> panic.
Say your 2.4 kernel was on partition 11, path
/boot/vmlinux-2.4.25-powerpc; now type
'hd:11,/boot/vmlinux-2.4.25-powerpc' at yaboot.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
oh!
Ah, an initrd kernel - unfortunately yaboot can't boot initrd kernels
unless properly configured in yaboot.conf, so that explains why my
suggestion didn't work.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 02:02:25PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> The daily and sarge_d-i images are identical.
The daily symlink was recently switched back to point to sid_d-i.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t/vmlinuz-prep.initrd
http://people.debian.org/~luther/d-i/images/daily/powerpc/netboot/2.6/vmlinuz-prep.initrd
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 04:40:22PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 09:30:02AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > http://people.debian.org/~luther/debian-installer/daily-powerpc-built/daily/powerpc/netboot/vmlinuz-prep.initrd
>
> Isn't that direct
es.
> Token Ring: olympic
In nic-extra-modules. Should it be moved to nic-modules so that it's in
the initrd? I know very little about Token Ring support.
> SCSI: sym2, IPR (I think its only in 2.6 unfortunately)
Already in scsi-modules.
> IDE:AMD74XX
Apparently no
> yaboot.conf ?
image=/vmlinux
label=Linux
read-only
initrd=/initrd.img
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to 3.0r2;
see <http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#update-cd>.
> 5) I've subscribed to this list, but is there any way to get the emails in a
> digest format??? I get 100 emails min. a day already :(
There are digest versions of some Debian lists, but
ers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X partition at boot
> time, whereas I also have an OS9 partition on hdb.
There's supposed to be a probe for this. Does "/System Folder/System"
exist on the Mac OS 9 filesystem, and is it HFS?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ions and renamed the boot partition from untitled
> to bootstrap.
The code that produces the message in question doesn't look at the
partition name. There was a bug that broke it, but I fixed that
recently. If it's still broken in partman-newworld 10,
rectify this
Have you tried video=ofonly?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r
> Linux?
Yes, it will, although for yaboot rather than GRUB, as previously
mentioned.
(The rest has already been answered, I think.)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_init
>
>
> Then it freezes. Does debian install on the G5 XServe? Do I need to
> do special things to make it work?
The PPC32 2.6.7 kernel doesn't support the XServe G5. Here's a kernel
patch that worked for us (also sent upstr
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:24:21AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:40:19PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > The PPC32 2.6.7 kernel doesn't support the XServe G5. Here's a kernel
> > patch that worked for us (also sent upstream):
> >
> >
ed to install a
> udeb, making the "root" floppy even more crowded.]
We're killing root-2; it wasn't a good idea to introduce it without good
support for loading it, and everything fits on root and net-drivers if
you juggle things around a bit
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 03:19:20PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> On Saturday, September 25, 2004, at 04:13 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:50:34AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> >>ROOT-2) The "root-2" floppy is a bunch of "udeb"s for all t
However, I believe that Sarge d-i has, as one of it's goals, to
> support both 2.4 and 2.6 on PowerPC architecture. Does anybody
> else on the list know for sure?
Yes. In any case, the hw-detect patch has already been uploaded so the
discussion is moot, although mac-io device tables would certainly be
very nice to have post-sarge so that we don't have to kludge
/etc/modules and can rely on hotplug instead.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
k over the
.diff.gz to see the changes from upstream.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
modifying quik-installer to match then.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll make it do
something more sensible based on that.
[M-F-T: -boot and -powerpc, as this is getting a bit specialised for
-devel.]
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 12:52:16AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:04:27AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > Just looked at the new version. It has changed in base-installer 1.14.
> > Ignore me ;-)
>
> It's moved to a different file (kernel/po
On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 12:43:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 12:19:19PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 24. Dezember 2004 01:52 schrieb Colin Watson:
> > > It's moved to a different file (kernel/powerpc.sh), but the code is
>
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
