Bug#996724: ruby3.0: FTBFS on ppc64el: Segmentation fault

2021-10-17 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby3.0 Version: 3.0.2-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs X-Debbugs-CC: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org I'm copying the debian-powerpc list to see if anyone can help. ruby3.0 fails to build on ppc64el. 4 test cases results in Segmentation faults. I was able

Re: Bug#996724: ruby3.0: FTBFS on ppc64el: Segmentation fault

2021-10-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:00:42AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hello! > > On 10/17/21 21:50, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > Ah, so the last successful build was 3.0.2-2 and the first failure was in > > 3.0.2-3, > > the only difference being the mipsel patch to fix an unaligned

Re: Bug#996724: ruby3.0: FTBFS on ppc64el: Segmentation fault

2021-10-18 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 12:59:35PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 10/18/21 12:51, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >> So, we need a backtrace to see where the crash actually happens. I assume > >> it's in one > >> of the build dependencies. > >

Re: Bug#996724: ruby3.0: FTBFS on ppc64el: Segmentation fault

2021-10-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 01:22:25PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 10/18/21 13:16, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > I don't think we are on the right track here. I need to read the failing > > test correctly. this "test case" alone is bogus, as > >

Re: Bug#996724: ruby3.0: FTBFS on ppc64el: Segmentation fault

2021-10-31 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Control: reopen -1 Control: retitle -1 ruby3.0: Segmentation fault on ppc64el when compiled with gcc-11 Control: severity -1 important Hi, On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 08:50:10AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > On 30/10/21 at 00:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > ruby 3.0 3.0.2-

apt http backend hangs in LXC container on ppc64el

2017-01-22 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, [sorry for the large cross-post, but I don't really know where the problem could be; please keep me in Cc: since I'm not debian-powerpc@ not on deity@] The Campinas IBM team has generously made a few VMs available to run the Debian CI (https://ci.debian.net) on ppc64el. I am having some troub

Re: Bug#881772: ruby2.5: FTBFS on ppc64(el): stack level too deep

2017-11-15 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 06:16:22PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Source: ruby2.5 > Version: 2.5.0~preview1-1 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > Justification: fails to build from source > User: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ppc64 ppc64el > > Builds of ruby2.5 for ppc64el a

Re: failed ppc64el build of ruby-ffi 1.9.3debian-2

2014-08-23 Thread Antonio Terceiro
htly broken: terceiro@pastel:~$ schroot -b -c unstable -n ruby-ffi E: /srv/chroot/unstable_ppc64el.tar.gz: Failed to stat file: No such file or directory -- Antonio Terceiro signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: failed ppc64el build of ruby-ffi 1.9.3debian-2

2014-08-26 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, (dropping debian-admin from the conversation as their side is dealt with) On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:44:04PM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote: > Hi Antonio, > > On 08/23/2014 11:59 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >> * Build > >> log:https://buildd.debian

arm64, ppc64el, mips64el: please provide ready-to-use VM images

2014-10-16 Thread Antonio Terceiro
https://people.debian.org/~aurel32/qemu/ Would that be possible? -- Antonio Terceiro signature.asc Description: Digital signature