Hi to everyone,
First I have to thank to all the people that gave me some advice in
the airport issues I was having.
I am not using gdm because sometimes xorg freezes (debian unstable).
From 10 times I boot my powerbook, xorg freezes a list 3 times (if
this happens I have to reboot and hope th
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 07:27:42PM +0200, Bin Zhang wrote:
> On 5/8/06, Bernhard Reiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >cpufreq-set -g ondemand
> >fails on linux-2.6.17-rc3 PowerBook5,6, config see below.
> >
> >dmesg has:
> > ondemand governor failed to load due to too long transition latency
> >
>
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 08:23 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:17:10AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> > 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
>
> Ok, this is atyfb, and you probably have a rage something chip in there. I
> wonder about the two fbdevs, but i suppose this is
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 09:53:53AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 08:23 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:17:10AM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > > 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> > > 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> >
> > Ok, this is atyfb, and you probably have a rage
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 10:13 +0200, Javier Ramirez wrote:
>
> I am not using gdm because sometimes xorg freezes (debian unstable).
> >From 10 times I boot my powerbook, xorg freezes a list 3 times (if
> this happens I have to reboot and hope that this doesn't happen
> again). I follow that xorg wi
Hi Frans,
(I am answering this email in the same group,
as it also addresses some of the problems of various mailinglists
and has its home on debian-powerpc.)
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 06:22:29PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 08 May 2006 11:18, you wrote:
> > it was brought to my attention t
> > $ more /proc/fb
> > 0 ATI Radeon Lf
>
> 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
Might be the LCD is actually on the second one?
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Maybe this helps:
> > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-462417.html
>
> Yes, it does.
>
> "JoseJX" write there that ondemand and conservative cannot be used
> on 7xx/74xx processors because of the time required to switch speeds.
The reason seems to be a rather conservative assumption on the
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 09:58 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> My diagnostic here, is that g-i makes some assumptions that are wrong
> on
> powerpc. Most probably it tries to load the vesafb module, but since
> the above
> is builtin in the powerpc kernel, that test fails, obviously.
> Furthermore,
> vesa
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > $ more /proc/fb
> > > 0 ATI Radeon Lf
> >
> > 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> > 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
>
> Might be the LCD is actually on the second one?
This might be the reason it fails, if it is so. But i am not sure, since the
dmesg outpu
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:33:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > $ more /proc/fb
> > > > 0 ATI Radeon Lf
> > >
> > > 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> > > 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> >
> > Might be the LCD is actually on the second one?
>
> This mi
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:52 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 05:33:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 12:16:38PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > > > $ more /proc/fb
> > > > > 0 ATI Radeon Lf
> > > >
> > > > 0 OFfb ATY,264LTP
> > > > 1 OFfb ATY,264LTP
>
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 10:32:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 10:13 +0200, Javier Ramirez wrote:
> >
> > I am not using gdm because sometimes xorg freezes (debian unstable).
> > >From 10 times I boot my powerbook, xorg freezes a list 3 times (if
> > this happens I have to
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:45:50PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Currently I've installed some 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 xserver-xorg packages,
... plus lots of packages from 6.9.0.dfsg.1-5, as it seems ...
Regards
Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Pfeiffer: /ICQ: 286585973/ + + + /AIM: crashinglinux/
http://
Hi,
I've noticed the very log value on bogomips on self-compiled 2.6.16.16
on iBook G4.
[06:12:59]ibookg4:~> cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
cpu : 7447A, altivec supported
clock : 1066.666000MHz
revision: 0.1 (pvr 8003 0101)
bogomips: 73.47
timebase
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 14:54 +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Maybe this helps:
> > > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-462417.html
> >
> > Yes, it does.
> >
> > "JoseJX" write there that ondemand and conservative cannot be used
> > on 7xx/74xx processors because of the time required to switch
On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 06:18 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed the very log value on bogomips on self-compiled 2.6.16.16
> on iBook G4.
.../...
Normal. We don't use CPU bogo loops for short timings, we use the CPU
timebase instead, thus you now get bogomips derived from the tim
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:18:19AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed the very log value on bogomips on self-compiled 2.6.16.16
> on iBook G4.
>
> [06:12:59]ibookg4:~> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> cpu : 7447A, altivec supported
> clock : 1066.66
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:18:19AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed the very log value on bogomips on self-compiled 2.6.16.16
> on iBook G4.
>
> [06:12:59]ibookg4:~> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> cpu : 7447A, altivec supported
> clock : 1066.66
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:18:19AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed the very log value on bogomips on self-compiled 2.6.16.16
> on iBook G4.
>
> [06:12:59]ibookg4:~> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor : 0
> cpu : 7447A, altivec supported
> clock : 1066.66
Hi,
> > I've noticed the very log value on bogomips on self-compiled 2.6.16.16
> > on iBook G4.
>
> .../...
>
> Normal. We don't use CPU bogo loops for short timings, we use the CPU
> timebase instead, thus you now get bogomips derived from the timebae
> frequency of the machine.
Thanks.
I wa
On 5/12/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There was an easy way not to problong the discussion. Restore the svn commit
acces, which you could have done all those weeks ago if you had not been too
proud and afraid to lose face.
Better: do like Linus, and take away access from all but o
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:18:28AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> On 5/12/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >There was an easy way not to problong the discussion. Restore the svn
> >commit
> >acces, which you could have done all those weeks ago if you had not been
> >too
> >proud an
On 5/15/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What happens if you do in X "xset +dpms force off" ? If that works, then
that's it.
The display is turns off properly. Woo Hoo! Thank you.
24 matches
Mail list logo