On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 01:01:38AM -0800, Joel Klecker wrote:
> At 09:09 -0500 1999-01-13, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >Theoretically one is supposed to, but a lot don't. In fact, until my
> >life calms down a bit, I'm off of -devel.
>
> I am not aware of any requirement to subscribe to -devel, ev
On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 11:13:59AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 1999 at 10:37:55AM +0100, Hans Spiegelaar wrote:
> > Hi y'all!
> >
> > Recently, I heard that Quake (or, even better, QuakeII) was 'ported'
> > to Linux for PowerPC. I have seen in mentioned in the newsgroups, but
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> i managed to download glib/gtk+ 1.1.12, and compiled it here on my sparc
> station, but on my linux box at home, i tried to launch dbuild on it, and was
> gratified with an internal compiler error, i had no time to go further into
> the
> problem, but i
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 12:24:58PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> > i managed to download glib/gtk+ 1.1.12, and compiled it here on my sparc
> > station, but on my linux box at home, i tried to launch dbuild on it, and
> > was
> > gratified
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, luther sven wrote:
> i think in this case the correct thing to do is to fill a bug against this
> package, did you do it ?
> you state there that the package don't compile, because of so and so,
> that they should apply the appended patch. and also for such important
> packa
Is there any way that I can set the reply-to address for the bug package?
I try to send a bug-report using bug, but it uses my [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as a mail address instead of my real email address.
Konstantinos Margaritis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 05:55:01PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> Is there any way that I can set the reply-to address for the bug package?
> I try to send a bug-report using bug, but it uses my [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> as a mail address instead of my real email address.
>
> Konstantinos Marga
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 05:17:52PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, luther sven wrote:
>
> > i think in this case the correct thing to do is to fill a bug against this
> > package, did you do it ?
> > you state there that the package don't compile, because of so and s
Previously Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> Is there any way that I can set the reply-to address for the bug package?
> I try to send a bug-report using bug, but it uses my [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> as a mail address instead of my real email address.
Try setting the EMAIL environment.
Wichert.
--
===
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Try setting the EMAIL environment.
That did it, thanks.
Konstantinos Margaritis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> And here we reach the really "fun" part. I would really appreciate if
> you could attempt to produce a test case. I think there is some
> information about doing this in the egcs-docs; what it boils down to is
> first isolating where in the source
On Fri, Jan 15, 1999 at 11:23:40PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> This is indeed funny, because I got myself down to just that... bug
> tracking. Well, I may say I have been lucky, because I managed to pinpoint
> the offending function. Actually there was no bug in testglib.c itself,
> rat
On Fri, 15 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I suspect that alloca itself is not at fault. Anyway
well, maybe you are right, but I found out that it is part of the problem.
Removing it removed the bug. And as you can see I have chopped off 99% of
the code. I could not remove anything mor
13 matches
Mail list logo
