> I don't intend to offend anyone, but I would rather see more frequent
> ports of packages for the ppc, which IMHO seems a little stale to me these
We aren't many powerpc developers. Debian is currently in a critical state
for new patches - some maintainers decided to delay the upload to unstable
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> We aren't many powerpc developers. Debian is currently in a critical state
> for new patches - some maintainers decided to delay the upload to unstable.
Just an idea... why don't introduce a 'porter'? That is, debian developers
probably have too much
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 03:36:14PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
>
> > We aren't many powerpc developers. Debian is currently in a critical state
> > for new patches - some maintainers decided to delay the upload to unstable.
>
> Just an id
Ok, I send the diffs necessary to fix these two packages for ppc. Both
have been tested twice for correctness. I also sent them to the package
maintainers. Should I also send to the bug list? I mean they are no longer
bugs right?
Konstantinos Margaritis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -ru xfractint-3.04.o
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 03:47:16PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>
> Ok, I send the diffs necessary to fix these two packages for ppc. Both
> have been tested twice for correctness. I also sent them to the package
> maintainers. Should I also send to the bug list? I mean they are no longer
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> We already have porters. I started as one. You don't need a package
> to register as a developer; you just need a way to help.
well, then perhaps I have misunderstood the prerequisites for being a
developer. If there are no objections then I will
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 03:59:17PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > We already have porters. I started as one. You don't need a package
> > to register as a developer; you just need a way to help.
>
> well, then perhaps I have misund
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 03:59:17PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > > What are you doing to egcs 1.1.1, out of curiousity? And is there
> > > really no 1.1.1 in the archive yet for powerpc? If there
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> If there is a compiler error in compare, something is SERIOUSLY wrong.
> If something is seriously wrong with egcs 1.1.1 on powerpc, I will not
> fix it. I'll upload a snapshot of pre-1.2 instead. Those are
> extroardinarily improved over our la
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Michel [iso-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> On what machine and using what kernel did you have those problems? I
> downloaded the 1.1.1 release source, and it built w/o problems on my 603e
> Amiga.
well, it is a 603e based umax c500, with 2.1.131 kernel, but I downloaded
the debian
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> Well, I built qt1.42 with full optimizations, and it works fine. Unless
> you're talking about the infamous text-selection bug that is still
> there...
That's what I meant. And it makes it pretty unusable IMHO. However, without
optimizations, it's gone. Now I'm h
> We already have porters. I started as one. You don't need a package
> to register as a developer; you just need a way to help.
100% true!
My first debian year i ported m68k packages -- without an own package.
> What are you doing to egcs 1.1.1, out of curiousity? And is there
> really no
On Jan 13, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>
> Ok, I send the diffs necessary to fix these two packages for ppc. Both
> have been tested twice for correctness. I also sent them to the package
> maintainers. Should I also send to the bug list? I mean they are no longer
> bugs right?
Hmm ... please
> Does anyone know the dotclock speeds for the built-in pmac display driver?
> They are not mentioned in the documentation...
>
> Or, if you've already done the math, have you any nice modelines?
Have you modelines from an older setup for your display (xfree modelines)?
MfG,
Hartmut
On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 02:13:59AM +0100, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
>
> > We already have porters. I started as one. You don't need a package
> > to register as a developer; you just need a way to help.
>
> 100% true!
>
> My first debian year i ported m68k packages -- without an own package.
>
On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 2.91.58 is in the tree -- should be egcs-1.1.1 :-)
>
> Yes, that's rather what I thought. Comments?
Pardon me, but 2.91.60 is 1.1.1, the one that is in the tree is 1.1.1pre
right?
Konstantinos Margaritis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>
> > No, but already working packages can be recompiled at new versions
> > automatically.
>
> True.
Is it possible for a failure of this auto-compile to automatically file
a bug-report against the package that won't compile?
tew
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 09:55:57PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > > 2.91.58 is in the tree -- should be egcs-1.1.1 :-)
> >
> > Yes, that's rather what I thought. Comments?
>
> Pardon me, but 2.91.60 is 1.1.1, the one that is in the
Ted Whalen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> >
> > > No, but already working packages can be recompiled at new versions
> > > automatically.
> >
> > True.
>
> Is it possible for a failure of this auto-compile to automatically file
> a bug-report against the package t
19 matches
Mail list logo
