Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-21 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Sep 21, 2001 at 05:48:00PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > > > The patch is rather hackish (there's no way to easily find a free PCI > > > > resource region in 2.2 kernels) and might not make it through BenH's or > > > > Alan's 'no brute force hacks' filter. If the Debian kernel package >

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-21 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > The patch is rather hackish (there's no way to easily find a free PCI > > > resource region in 2.2 kernels) and might not make it through BenH's or > > > Alan's 'no brute force hacks' filter. If the Debian kernel package > > > maintainer accepts it, fine. > > > > Ok, I filed a bug against ker

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 03:33:41PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > I'd rather make a set of 2.4 install disks available than include > > patches like this in our 2.2 kernel. > > It's certainly possible to change the boot-floppies over to 2.4 > kernels, but I doubt the wisdom of that. I recently t

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-20 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 03:33:41PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > It's certainly possible to change the boot-floppies over to 2.4 > kernels, but I doubt the wisdom of that. I recently tried to run the > kernel-image-2.4-powerpc (2.4.8-1) and it wouldn't even boot my > machine (hung after the RTC

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-20 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:18:29AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > The patch is rather hackish (there's no way to easily find a free PCI > > > resource region in 2.2 kernels) and might not make i

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:18:29AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The patch is rather hackish (there's no way to easily find a free PCI > > resource region in 2.2 kernels) and might not make it through BenH's or > > Alan's 'no brute force hacks' fil

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-20 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The patch is rather hackish (there's no way to easily find a free PCI > resource region in 2.2 kernels) and might not make it through BenH's or > Alan's 'no brute force hacks' filter. If the Debian kernel package > maintainer accepts it, fine. Ok, I

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-20 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > I'll try your kernel patch -- should I also perhaps try the 2.4 kernel? > > > > Try the 2.4 kernel first. If that doesn't fix it, my patch won't either. > > Sorry, I went ahead and stuck with kernel 2.2.19 with your patch. > > Your patch fixed it. Should I file a bug against the pmac to a

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-19 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > should have read X -probeonly (where did that go?), sorry. > > > > That crashes it as well. I just tested with xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-5 > > and -6, same results. > > > > I'll try your kernel patch -- should I also perhaps try the 2.4 kernel? > >

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-19 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > should have read X -probeonly (where did that go?), sorry. > > That crashes it as well. I just tested with xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-5 > and -6, same results. > > I'll try your kernel patch -- should I also perhaps try the 2.4 kernel? Try the 2.4 kernel first. If that doesn't fix it, my patch w

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-09-18 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I can't, due to the kernel crash which occurs when running this. > > > > Sorry, I forgot how bad this can be... Does it also panic with X > > should have read X -probeonly (where did that go?), sorry. That crashes it as well. I just tested with

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-08-24 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > Please send the full X server log (the section about PCI device > > probing/fixup might prove interesting) > > I can't, due to the kernel crash which occurs when running this. Sorry, I forgot how bad this can be... Does it also panic with X > Should I file a bug on kernel-image-2.2.19-pmac

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-08-24 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I can't, due to the kernel crash which occurs when running this. > > Sorry, I forgot how bad this can be... Does it also panic with X should have read X -probeonly (where did that go?), sorry. Michael

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-08-24 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Wallstreet and 2.2 kernel Yes, 2.2.19-pmac stock kernel. >, and you boot using BootX I suppose? No, booting with a hacked miboot floppy, believe it or not. I don't have MacOS installed. > Please send the full X server log (the section about PCI de

Re: xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-08-24 Thread Michael Schmitz
> Distribution: pure 'testing' > Version: 4.1.0-2 > Kernel: kernel-image-2.2.19-pmac 2.2.19-2 > > Installing the new xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 from unstable causes an > error: > > (WW) ATI: PCI/AGP Mach64 in slot 0:17:0 could not be detected! > (EE) No devices detected. > > With a subsequ

xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 fails where 4.0.2-7puetzk worked

2001-08-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Please CC me on any replies, I am not subscribed to this list. Hardware: PowerBook G3 (Wall Street) Distribution: pure 'testing' Version: 4.1.0-2 Kernel: kernel-image-2.2.19-pmac 2.2.19-2 Installing the new xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 from unstable causes an error: (WW) ATI: PCI/AGP