Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > In particular, Michel, you toke the 2.2.10 kernel package from me. Did
> > > you also do a 2.4.x version of it ?
> >
> > Not yet, but I'm planning to do it as soon as I get enough time. BTW I
> > assume I can upload packages for new kernel versions without ITP or
> > anyth
Sven LUTHER wrote:
In particular, Michel, you toke the 2.2.10 kernel package from me. Did you
also do a 2.4.x version of it ?
Not yet, but I'm planning to do it as soon as I get enough time. BTW I assume
I can upload packages for new kernel versions without ITP or anything?
No you don't ne
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:05:08PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Sven LUTHER wrote:
>
> > I would ask you all what is the current status of the apus kernels, in
> > particular, is the 2.4.x kernel mature for use in the debian boot floppies.
>
> I'd think so. I gather it's about even between peopl
Sven LUTHER wrote:
> I would ask you all what is the current status of the apus kernels, in
> particular, is the 2.4.x kernel mature for use in the debian boot floppies.
I'd think so. I gather it's about even between people for whom 2.2 or 2.4
works better.
> In particular, Michel, you toke the
Hello all, ...
I would ask you all what is the current status of the apus kernels, in
particular, is the 2.4.x kernel mature for use in the debian boot floppies.
This would make it the default kernel to be used in most debian installs, so
if there are still big problems with the 2.4.x kernels, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2001-05-09 20:07, Garry Roseman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A related question: how can one determine what options were set
> when any given kernel was compiled? Specifically, is there a way
> to find out what options produced the stock Debia
I compiled the Debian 2.2.19 kernel on my PowerMac and found that with my
new kernel the usb keyboard generates weird characters. The stock 2.2.19
kernel works fine but I don't know what magic combination of USB and Mac
Driver options gives that correct behavior. Having read through the
docum
Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:14:41AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
>
> > #
> > # USB HID
> > #
> > CONFIG_USB_HID=y
> > CONFIG_USB_WACOM=y
> > CONFIG_USB_WMFORCE=m
> > CONFIG_INPUT_KEYBDEV=y
> > CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y
> > CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_SCREEN_X=1024
> > CONFIG_INPUT_M
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 11:14:41AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> But I'm afraid I have to disagree about 2.2.18. Here are the Debian
> 2.2.18pre21 .config
> sections:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] eb]$ uname -a
Linux socrates 2.2.18 #1 Wed Dec 13 19:21:15 AKST 2000 ppc unknown
im using the new input l
Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:39:42AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> > Ethan Benson wrote:
> >
> > > stick with 2.2.18, its stable from mainline, requires no patching, no
> > > bk, no rysnc crap.
> >
> > Actually, stock 2.2.18 from kernel.org does *NOT* build without patches,
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:39:42AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> > stick with 2.2.18, its stable from mainline, requires no patching, no
> > bk, no rysnc crap.
>
> Actually, stock 2.2.18 from kernel.org does *NOT* build without patches, if
> you
> build with the new in
Ethan Benson wrote:
> stick with 2.2.18, its stable from mainline, requires no patching, no
> bk, no rysnc crap.
Actually, stock 2.2.18 from kernel.org does *NOT* build without patches, if you
build with the new input layer (i.e. with the Debian .config). The thing to do
is
probably to get kern
2.4.1 (w/smp) rsynced (?is that a verb?) from fsm labs seems to compile
and run fine over a potato base w/gcc 2.95.2 and libc6 2.1.3-13. Needed
to update ppp to 2.4.0f-1. This is on an Oldworld S900 - 604eX2 dual
booting via quik. Hybrid Debian Potato Base & Developement .debs + X
4.0.2 from source
I use kernel 2.2.18 on all my machines
will try 2.4 when its 2.4.5 or 2.4.6
--
Yours Sincerely,
Gjermund Gusland Thorsen
For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to buy Microsoft.
On lørdag 10. februar 2001 01:17, Jens Schmalzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Fabian Jakobs
On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 01:49:01AM +0100, Fabian Jakobs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a bit confused. There seem to be some different 2.4er kernel trees for
> ppc around. I heard of paulus, benh and linus kernels. Maybe there are even
> more. Could anyone point out, which kernel to use and how they diff
Hi,
Fabian Jakobs writes:
> Could anyone point out, which kernel to use and how they differ?
As a general rule, The more recent the kernel, The more trouble it
invites. The difference between the various kernel trees floating
around is usually the frequency at which they are updated, some may
a
Hi,
I am a bit confused. There seem to be some different 2.4er kernel trees for
ppc around. I heard of paulus, benh and linus kernels. Maybe there are even
more. Could anyone point out, which kernel to use and how they differ?
mfg Fabian
P.S.
Which one is the debian kernel?
17 matches
Mail list logo
