Re: rsync vs BK kernel trees

2003-01-29 Thread Andrew Nesbit
Thankyou for the clarification. Andrew.

Re: rsync vs BK kernel trees

2003-01-29 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 08:34:16PM +0100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > linuxppc_2_4_devel is where any remaining 2.4-specific development by > > Cort is going on, and linuxppc_2_4_benh is Ben's tree (where the really > > experimental stuff is). The rsync is just a regular snapshot of the > > B

Re: rsync vs BK kernel trees

2003-01-28 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 18:51, Derrik Pates wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:08:21PM +1100, Andrew Nesbit wrote: > > One of the pages at ppckernel.org says that the BenH and BK trees are > > slightly different and maintained by different people: BenH doing one tree > > and Cort Dougan doing the BK

Re: rsync vs BK kernel trees

2003-01-28 Thread Derrik Pates
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:08:21PM +1100, Andrew Nesbit wrote: > One of the pages at ppckernel.org says that the BenH and BK trees are > slightly different and maintained by different people: BenH doing one tree > and Cort Dougan doing the BK tree. Surely this is outdated information? > > Also, wh

rsync vs BK kernel trees

2003-01-28 Thread Andrew Nesbit
I'm trying to wrap my head around all these PPC Linux kernel trees... One of the pages at ppckernel.org says that the BenH and BK trees are slightly different and maintained by different people: BenH doing one tree and Cort Dougan doing the BK tree. Surely this is outdated information? Also, what