> > How come I find a big fat wine binary running with coreldraw?
> >
> > Sample top memory processes:
> >
> > 23600 root 4 0 21704 21M 2600 S 0 2.8 5.5 19:57 X
> > 6860 schmitz0 0 19896 19M 11196 S 324 0.0 5.1 0:01 wine
> > 6875 schmitz2 0 19896 19M 111
> They used winelib. That's the only way to create Linux native applications.
How come I find a big fat wine binary running with coreldraw?
Sample top memory processes:
23600 root 4 0 21704 21M 2600 S 0 2.8 5.5 19:57 X
6860 schmitz0 0 19896 19M 11196 S 324 0.0 5
Quoting Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > They used winelib. That's the only way to create Linux native
> applications.
>
> How come I find a big fat wine binary running with coreldraw?
>
> Sample top memory processes:
>
> 23600 root 4 0 21704 21M 2600 S 0 2.8 5.5 19:
Quoting Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Using Wine _is_ x86 specific in the sense that Wine emulates enough
> of
> > > the
> > > Windows low level API to let x86 code including DLLs run on Linux.
> To my
> > > knowledge, there is no port of Wine to another architecture. You
> cpould
> >
> > Using Wine _is_ x86 specific in the sense that Wine emulates enough of
> > the
> > Windows low level API to let x86 code including DLLs run on Linux. To my
> > knowledge, there is no port of Wine to another architecture. You cpould
> > argue Wine can be run under some x86 emulator - does making
Quoting Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Wine so the code may be unportable. There's still enough in the way
> of
> > > windowmanager-Corel interaction to make you cry).
> >
> > Using wine as a porting library is not x86 specific. Companies could
> use it to
> > quickly port to Linux,
>And M$ just acquired 25% of the shares of Corel, which resulted in a raise of
>57% for Corel on the stock market...
Oh dear! This means that "Microsoft Linux" is a reality now.
There is no escape! We are tosted! :-P
Sergio
> > Wine so the code may be unportable. There's still enough in the way of
> > windowmanager-Corel interaction to make you cry).
>
> Using wine as a porting library is not x86 specific. Companies could use it
> to
> quickly port to Linux, testing the response from the community and then doing
>
Quoting Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > And sloppy programming includes the tendency (of companies doing a
> quick
> > > Linux port) to use Wine (not even winelib) to make regular windows
> > > applications run on Linux. Seen that with Corel, and it wasn't a bit
> > > pretty in the begi
> > And sloppy programming includes the tendency (of companies doing a quick
> > Linux port) to use Wine (not even winelib) to make regular windows
> > applications run on Linux. Seen that with Corel, and it wasn't a bit
> > pretty in the beginning. Seeing that no company is willing to dedicate
>
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> >SB> Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6)
> >SB> different platforms but commercial software like Star,
> >SB> Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only
> >SB> available for ix86? Are there any political
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) different
Only 6? :-)
> platforms but commercial software like Star, Corel, Adobe and IBM,
> just to mention a few, are only available for ix86? Are there any
> political or technical reason
Sergio Brandano wrote:
> Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) different
> platforms but commercial software like Star, Corel, Adobe and IBM,
> just to mention a few, are only available for ix86? Are there any
> political or technical reasons for it?
Because they don't fe
>SB> Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6)
>SB> different platforms but commercial software like Star,
>SB> Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only
>SB> available for ix86? Are there any political or technical
>SB> reasons for it?
>
> There ar
"SB" == Sergio Brandano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6)
SB> different platforms but commercial software like Star,
SB> Corel, Adobe and IBM, just to mention a few, are only
SB> available for ix86? Are there any political or tec
Hi,
Out of blue, why is that Linux now runs stable on six (6) different
platforms but commercial software like Star, Corel, Adobe and IBM,
just to mention a few, are only available for ix86? Are there any
political or technical reasons for it?
Sergio
16 matches
Mail list logo
