On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:35:11AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Does that new address range only work with the IDE card, and did other
> pcmcia devices work at the old address perhaps? I recall something about
> pcmcia IDE devices using some hack in the kernel to bypass the normal
> pcmcia inter
> > You never tried lspci -v on your own machine? Apple apparently changes the
> > device addresses with each major new hardware revision. (not that you
> > couldn't change the addresses for unused devices to whatever you like from
> > user space with setpci. That's the beauty of a sane bus design
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 09:41:54AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> You never tried lspci -v on your own machine? Apple apparently changes the
> device addresses with each major new hardware revision. (not that you
> couldn't change the addresses for unused devices to whatever you like from
> user s
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Grant Hollingworth wrote:
> The first set was from the output of lspci -v, which I read about in
> some old list message.
You never tried lspci -v on your own machine? Apple apparently changes the
device addresses with each major new hardware revision. (not that you
couldn't
In case anyone cares, I got PCMCIA working on my tibook. I changed
/etc/pcmcia/config.opts from
include port 0x1000-0x10ff, port 0x1400-0x14ff
include memory 0x8040-0x807ff000, memory 0xf300-0xf33ff000
to
include port 0x1000-0x1fff
include memory 0x9000-0x90ff
T
5 matches
Mail list logo
