Re: package update lag on powerpc

2000-02-23 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 03:08:49PM -0800, C.M. Connelly wrote: > > "DJ" == Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Daniel, > > DJ> I feel like I've answered this question a thousand > DJ> times There is a build daemon now, but only for > DJ> potato, and I do not have time t

Re: package update lag on powerpc

2000-02-21 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 10:03:25AM +0100, Hartmut Koptein wrote: > > I feel like I've answered this question a thousand times > > > > There is a build daemon now, but only for potato, and I do not have > >not now, i've setup one for powerpc from mi

Re: package update lag on powerpc

2000-02-21 Thread Hartmut Koptein
> I feel like I've answered this question a thousand times > > There is a build daemon now, but only for potato, and I do not have not now, i've setup one for powerpc from mid 1998 > time to fix all of its failures by hand. There are also packages

Re: package update lag on powerpc

2000-02-21 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
Groff was a messup with the build daemon. It's been fixed. I don't know what the deal with slocate was, I'm trying to figure it out from the logs. It's not _ALL_ warnings, it's a few that indicate powerpc-specific problems, like the character signedness (comparison always false) mess. On Sun, F

Re: package update lag on powerpc

2000-02-21 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 07:14:38PM -0600, Kevin Puetz wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > I feel like I've answered this question a thousand times > > You have, I asked at least once before. > > > There is a build daemon now, but only for potato, and I do not have > > time to fix all of i

Re: package update lag on powerpc

2000-02-21 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 12:45:19PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > There is a build daemon now, but only for potato, and I do not have > time to fix all of its failures by hand. There are also packages which > build but present warnings which indicate serious problems, and I mark > to look at l

Re: package update lag on powerpc

2000-02-21 Thread Kevin Puetz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > I feel like I've answered this question a thousand times You have, I asked at least once before. > There is a build daemon now, but only for potato, and I do not have > time to fix all of its failures by hand. There are also packages > which build but present warni

Re: package update lag on powerpc

2000-02-20 Thread C.M. Connelly
> "DJ" == Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Daniel, DJ> I feel like I've answered this question a thousand DJ> times There is a build daemon now, but only for DJ> potato, and I do not have time to fix all of its failures DJ> by hand. There are also packages which bui

Re: package update lag on powerpc

2000-02-20 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
I feel like I've answered this question a thousand times There is a build daemon now, but only for potato, and I do not have time to fix all of its failures by hand. There are also packages which build but present warnings which indicate serious problems, and I mark to look at later. I've po

package update lag on powerpc

2000-02-20 Thread Ethan Benson
Hi, I have noticed that package updates seem to take a very long time to get installed into the powerpc tree (but not always..), for example slocate which was broken in that it would not install when the most recent findutils was installed has been fixed on i386 for ages, and still is not in the p