On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 07:14:38PM -0600, Kevin Puetz wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > I feel like I've answered this question a thousand times.... > > You have, I asked at least once before. > > > There is a build daemon now, but only for potato, and I do not have > > time to fix all of its failures by hand. There are also packages > > which build but present warnings which indicate serious problems, and > > I mark to look at later. I've posted the list a few times. No one > > else seems quite inspired enough to look at them, either. > > Could the list be put somewhere (on the web) periodically? Espescially with > some kind of a status whiteboard so we don't all try the same ones - though I > guess posting bug-report updates could work for that. > > Also, I've actually got several such packages built locally, but with no idea > how I should go about getting them into FTP. I just don't really want to open > bug reports when the actual source for the maintainer is fine, it just needs > apt-get source -b <pkg> and an upload... > > I have a site (at southpole.penguinpowered.com) where some of my stuff is > up... I would be willing to aid in the shoveling of these files, but I expect > I speak for quite of few of us who aren't developers (by which I mean > official > debian developers) in not being sure what do do with the packages we've > built.
Those are generally not-uploaded for a reason - either because they slipped through the cracks of the buildd (my fumblings at setting it up caused a few such) or because they raised red flagged warnings during compilation and I marked them for a look before uploading. I've posted that list too. I know, I need to make it more available. I'm working on it. Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
