Re: offset x screen

2001-08-18 Thread Bruce McIntyre
* Bruce McIntyre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 02:40:35AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > Bruce McIntyre wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > Thanks for trying to describe what you see, but I'm afraid I don't get > > > > the > > > > picture. > > > > > > (Scratches his head

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-17 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 02:29:04PM +1000, Bruce McIntyre wrote: > > I am a newbie... does this mean you want the output of startx &> foo.txt? > I'll send you that now. mail -s xfreelog [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /var/log/XFree86.0.log btw: your Mail-Followup-To: header is broken. -- Ethan Benson http

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-16 Thread Bruce McIntyre
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 02:40:35AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Bruce McIntyre wrote: > > [...] > > > > Thanks for trying to describe what you see, but I'm afraid I don't get the > > > picture. > > > > (Scratches his head) Ok, I'll do a series of pictures > > [...] > > Thanks, I think I get

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-16 Thread Michel Dänzer
Bruce McIntyre wrote: [...] > > Thanks for trying to describe what you see, but I'm afraid I don't get the > > picture. > > (Scratches his head) Ok, I'll do a series of pictures [...] Thanks, I think I get it now. > It refuses to go into a normal 1024x768 mode. Instead it goes to a reso- > l

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-16 Thread Bruce McIntyre
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 04:14:51PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > Bruce McIntyre wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:00:05PM +1000, Bruce McIntyre wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:13:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > > > I have hopefully found the bug in the fbdev driver now,

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-16 Thread Michel Dänzer
Bruce McIntyre wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:00:05PM +1000, Bruce McIntyre wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:13:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > > > I have hopefully found the bug in the fbdev driver now, please test > > > > > > http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/patches/fbdev-fboffs

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-16 Thread Bruce McIntyre
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:00:05PM +1000, Bruce McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:13:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > I have fixed fbdevhw beyond the patch on that page with the help of Geert. > > > > I have hopefully found the bug in the fbdev driver now, please test > > > > ht

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-16 Thread Bruce McIntyre
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 02:13:37AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > I have fixed fbdevhw beyond the patch on that page with the help of Geert. > > I have hopefully found the bug in the fbdev driver now, please test > > http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/patches/fbdev-fboffset.diff > > or > > http://p

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-15 Thread Michel Dänzer
Bruce McIntyre wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 07:28:42PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > as fbi (the frame buffer image viewer) also wraps the screen, albeit on > > > the other side, does this mean we are barking up the wrong config? > > > perhaps this is a k

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-15 Thread Bruce McIntyre
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 07:28:42PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > as fbi (the frame buffer image viewer) also wraps the screen, albeit on the > > other side, does this mean we are barking up the wrong config? > > perhaps this is a kernel thing... > > Unlikely. As I m

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-02 Thread Michel Dänzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > as fbi (the frame buffer image viewer) also wraps the screen, albeit on the > other side, does this mean we are barking up the wrong config? > perhaps this is a kernel thing... Unlikely. As I mentioned already, I suspect both fbi and X handle the framebuffer offset inco

Re: offset x screen

2001-08-01 Thread bmcintyre
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 08:55:19AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > I can see a number of differences between our setups: > (1) You are using a 2.2 kernel, I am using a 2.4 kernel. > (2) You have controlfb using video mode 13 and color mode 2. > I am using video mode 18 and color mode 1. > (3) I use th

Re: offset x screen

2001-07-18 Thread Duncan Sands
I can see a number of differences between our setups: (1) You are using a 2.2 kernel, I am using a 2.4 kernel. (2) You have controlfb using video mode 13 and color mode 2. I am using video mode 18 and color mode 1. (3) I use the default framebuffer modes. This gives me (XFree86.0.log) (II) FBDev(

Re: offset x screen

2001-07-17 Thread bmcintyre
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 06:24:45AM -0700, David J. Roundy wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 10:08:24AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 08:58:42PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > > > > > > I had the same problem. Try running X at 15bpp. > > > > > > Duncan. > > > > I have

Re: offset x screen

2001-07-17 Thread David J. Roundy
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 10:08:24AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 08:58:42PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > > > > I had the same problem. Try running X at 15bpp. > > > > Duncan. > > I have done this now, but problem is not yet fully solved. There was a small > improvem

Re: offset x screen

2001-07-16 Thread bmcintyre
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 08:58:42PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > On Friday 13 July 2001 6:29 pm, Bruce McIntyre wrote: > > Hello all. I am the proud owner of a powermac 7300 (which uses the > > `control' video chipset). Using the unstable x packages is very strange, > > as my entire screen is offs

Re: offset x screen

2001-07-13 Thread Duncan Sands
On Friday 13 July 2001 6:29 pm, Bruce McIntyre wrote: > Hello all. I am the proud owner of a powermac 7300 (which uses the > `control' video chipset). Using the unstable x packages is very strange, > as my entire screen is offset to the right. The part that would be missing > is on the left of th

Re: offset x screen

2001-07-13 Thread Michel Dänzer
Bruce McIntyre wrote: > > Hello all. I am the proud owner of a powermac 7300 (which uses the `control' > video chipset). > Using the unstable x packages is very strange, as my entire screen is > offset to the right. > The part that would be missing is on the left of the screen. Depending on > the

offset x screen

2001-07-13 Thread Bruce McIntyre
Hello all. I am the proud owner of a powermac 7300 (which uses the `control' video chipset). Using the unstable x packages is very strange, as my entire screen is offset to the right. The part that would be missing is on the left of the screen. Depending on the resolution i set in the config f