Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-10 Thread Ethan Benson
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:16:51AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Ethan Benson wrote: > > > try ofpath /dev/sda first to see if it supports that machine, ofpath > > supports most oldworlds but i may have missed a few, people need to > > send me more device-trees. > > It doesn't work on my Motor

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Ethan Benson wrote: > try ofpath /dev/sda first to see if it supports that machine, ofpath > supports most oldworlds but i may have missed a few, people need to > send me more device-trees. It doesn't work on my Motorola StarMax 3000/160 (pmac 4400/160 clone), here's the message: ofpath: This ma

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-06 Thread Andrew Sharp
It was the same for most of us non-apple heads. a Philipp Kaeser wrote: > > hej, > > > i now have the box right beside me, it has macos 7.5.3 > > loaded on its single HD the bootx .sit file is on the > > cdrom but it is not recognized by macos > I suppose you already installed the StuffIt Expa

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-06 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 09:09:32PM -0300, Peter Cordes wrote: > > I took a stab at getting quik to work on my Daystar Genesis MP the other > day. (no luck, sticking with bootx. I'll have to get myself an adapter for > the Mac serial port, since OF seems to reset it input-device and > output-dev

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Peter Cordes
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 01:58:57PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > if you are lucky all you need to change is the boot-device variable, > like this: > > nvsetenv boot-device "$(ofpath /dev/sda)0" > > try ofpath /dev/sda first to see if it supports that machine, ofpath > supports most oldworlds but i

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:26:10PM +0200, Bruno Waes wrote: > > i now have the box right beside me, it has macos 7.5.3 loaded on its single > HD > the bootx .sit file is on the cdrom but it is not recognized by macos proprietary fileformats, you need an extractor. > i need linux on this machine

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Andrew Sharp
I uploaded some more stuff to that location. Like this (s): http://www.netfall.com/powerpc/stuffit_expander_55.bin Even a Linux unstuffit x86 .deb which is very funky. Read the readme. One of the funkiest parts is that every time I run dselect, it ejects this package from my system. Oh we

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Philipp Kaeser
hej, > i now have the box right beside me, it has macos 7.5.3 > loaded on its single HD the bootx .sit file is on the > cdrom but it is not recognized by macos I suppose you already installed the StuffIt Expander? (When I installed debian first on the PowerPC it took me about two days to figur

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Andrew Sharp wrote: > Well, not really. I have a machine with only 7.5.2 on it, and was > able to get stuffit and bootx on there. You just have to use the > right version of stuffit. They have many on their ftp site. Really? What's the right version? I could only find the most recent, which

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Andrew Sharp
Well, not really. I have a machine with only 7.5.2 on it, and was able to get stuffit and bootx on there. You just have to use the right version of stuffit. They have many on their ftp site. The fight is not won, however, until you can get it onto the mockos partition, unless you're downloading

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Adam C Powell IV
D'oh! Jumped elsewhere mid-sentence... Adam C Powell IV wrote: > Uh oh... I wasn't able to get it to unpack in MockOS either (on a Motorola > StarMax- pmac 4400 clone with 7.6, the newer StuffIt don't run on <8.1), had > to > unpack the tarball in Linux (link somewhere in the "Sand use hfscopy

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Bruno Waes wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Ethan Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:23 PM > Subject: Re: new installation on 4400/200 > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Bruno Waes wrote: > >&

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread David J. Roundy
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 03:26:10PM +0200, Bruno Waes wrote: > > From: "Ethan Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:23 PM > Subject: Re: new installation on 4400/200 > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Bruno Waes wr

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Bruno Waes
- Original Message - From: "Ethan Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:23 PM Subject: Re: new installation on 4400/200 On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Bruno Waes wrote: >> so far i managed to install debian on i386, sparc and

Re: new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Ethan Benson
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 10:00:21AM +0200, Bruno Waes wrote: > so far i managed to install debian on i386, sparc and alpha, and now i want > to give powerpc a try ;-) you will find that oldworld macs are a right pain in the ass to bootstrap without macos. if you keep macos around you can use bootx

new installation on 4400/200

2001-04-05 Thread Bruno Waes
so far i managed to install debian on i386, sparc and alpha, and now i want to give powerpc a try ;-) in a few days i am getting a 4400/200 system, i heard that is a pci system where i can use normal pc nic's for example (ones supported by linux), is this correct ? is this machine able to boot fr