Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-07 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask > > every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their > > packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify > > (opt-in) maintainers about such problems). The port maintainers > > already have a si

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-07 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > It was easily reproduced - there's no libmwdrivers.a for powerpc and the > > microwindows build tries to use that before it's built. > > No, no, a thousand times no. microwindows does try to build > libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving me a log of Not on powerpc it doesn'

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 01:42:41PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving me a log of > the actual failure (which will require dropping that silly redirection > from debian/rules), you're just guessing. Sent by private mail. -- "You grabbe

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It was easily reproduced - there's no libmwdrivers.a for powerpc and the > microwindows build tries to use that before it's built. No, no, a thousand times no. microwindows does try to build libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving m

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask > > every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their > > packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify > > (opt-in) maintainers about such problems). The port maintainers > > Such as the pack

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask > every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their > packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify > (opt-in) maintainers about

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
I concur with Dan here - part because it's really his job, part because I've had it with filing bug reports from m68k buildds myself. But there's always two sides to that issue, so: > > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask > > every maintainer to do a few extra steps

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Adam Olsen
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > (I rarely do these > > > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and > > > logs).

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I've rescheduled the 0.88pre11-4 build hoping the build dependencies > > install now. But that doesn't relate to #121459 at all. > > As far as I can tell, it doesn't work: > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=microwindows&ver=0.88pre11-4&arch=powerpc&stamp=1010178840&file=log&as=raw The

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Michael Schmitz
> microwindows is not building on powerpc, but I don't know why. The make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/microwindows-0.88pre11/build/fb/microwin/src' make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/microwindows-0.88pre11/build/fb/microwin/src/apps' make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/mi

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 08:18:59PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > What do you mean by "the build report"? Do you mean bug report > 121459? The bug, sorry. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever." pgppEauWGvXT6.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 03:47:30PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > (I rarely do these > > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and > > logs). > > This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not > responsible

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask > every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their > packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify > (opt-in) maintainers about such problems). R

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's why (only the last of four identical errors). According to the > package listing page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages there's no > libmwdrivers.a in any of the PowerPC packages, any distribution. On ix86 > the file is in libmicrowindow

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-06 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's why (only the last of four identical errors). According to the > package listing page at http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages there's no > libmwdrivers.a in any of the PowerPC packages, any distribution. On ix86 > the file is in libmicrowindow

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > libs/microwindows_0.88pre11-4: Dep-Wait by schmitz-pb [optional:uncompiled] > > Dependencies: freetype2-dev (>= 1.3.1-1), freetype2 (= 1.3.1-1) > > That may be a repercussion of using an outdated version of apt on my > autobuilder - I can retry that build. It's obvious after attempting to in

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Please don't. I just tried to build it and got exactly the same error > > > > as in the build report. > > > > > What version of apt do you have installed? > > > > 0.5.4. Why? > > Because I suspected a problem with apt at the bottom of thes

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 07:10:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > I would like to close bug 121459, and rely on powerpc to attempt a > > build by the normal process and report a new bug against the current > > Please don't. I just tried to buil

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've rescheduled the 0.88pre11-4 build hoping the build dependencies > install now. But that doesn't relate to #121459 at all. Oh yes, and Michael: direct mail to you still bounces with your mail server saying "We don't accept mail from spammers".

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > Please note that I haven't filed any bug of that sort (I rarely do these > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and logs). FYI: It's worth telling to maintainers - a huge proportion won't pay any attention unl

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've rescheduled the 0.88pre11-4 build hoping the build dependencies > install now. But that doesn't relate to #121459 at all. As far as I can tell, it doesn't work: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=microwindows&ver=0.88pre11-4&arch=powerpc&st

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-05 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Michael Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (I rarely do these > days, rather rely on the maintainer to check build status and > logs). This is not such a good idea. Maintainers are generally not responsible for checking build status and logs; the port maintainer (whoever is responsible for m

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-04 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > > Please don't. I just tried to build it and got exactly the same error > > > as in the build report. > > > What version of apt do you have installed? > > 0.5.4. Why? Because I suspected a problem with apt at the bottom of these 'freetype2 cannot be installed' problems. Next guess.

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 07:21:52PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > Please don't. I just tried to build it and got exactly the same error > > as in the build report. > What version of apt do you have installed? 0.5.4. Why? -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-04 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > I would like to close bug 121459, and rely on powerpc to attempt a > > build by the normal process and report a new bug against the current > > Please don't. I just tried to build it and got exactly the same error > as in the build report. What version of apt do you have installed? M

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-04 Thread Michael Schmitz
> microwindows is not building on powerpc, but I don't know why. The > bug report filed seems wrong to me, and the buildd report at > http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=powerpc&state=Dep-Wait > reports: > > libs/microwindows_0.88pre11-4: Dep-Wait by schmitz-pb [optional:uncompiled] > Dependenc

Re: microwindows build status

2002-01-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 07:10:58PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > I would like to close bug 121459, and rely on powerpc to attempt a > build by the normal process and report a new bug against the current Please don't. I just tried to build it and got exactly the same error as in the build

microwindows build status

2002-01-03 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
microwindows is not building on powerpc, but I don't know why. The bug report filed seems wrong to me, and the buildd report at http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=powerpc&state=Dep-Wait reports: libs/microwindows_0.88pre11-4: Dep-Wait by schmitz-pb [optional:uncompiled] Dependencies: freet