Re: 2.4.10 Lombard IDE fix (was: Re: ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh))

2001-09-29 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> >Comments: simple_feature_tweak shouldn't ignore the type argument it got >passed. And requesting macio_unknown in the heathrow IDE functions is just >a hack really, to make macio_find not care about the particular chip >type. The Lombard would need macio_paddington, true heathrow based >machines

2.4.10 Lombard IDE fix (was: Re: ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh))

2001-09-28 Thread Michael Schmitz
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > I'd place my bet on some voodoo in the generic IDE mess that changed. > > Actually I take that back. hda and hdb are probed but found not present. > Seems ide0 doesn't get enabled properly ... Patch to apply a quick fix for this, use at your own ris

Re: ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh)

2001-09-28 Thread Michael Schmitz
> I'd place my bet on some voodoo in the generic IDE mess that changed. Actually I take that back. hda and hdb are probed but found not present. Seems ide0 doesn't get enabled properly ... Michael

Re: ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh)

2001-09-28 Thread Michael Schmitz
> I got the same error on PowerBook G3 Wallstreet II 266, kernel 2.4.10-ben0 > > Here's what I hand copied from the broken kernel: > > Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 > ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx > pmac_ide: enabling IDE bus ID 0 >

Re: ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh)

2001-09-28 Thread Michael Schmitz
> > The dmesg output you quoted seemed to indicate hda was found and > > contains 11 partitions > > I think you missed the fact that he was showing was was /missing/ from > the new kernel dmesg. Indeed, I missed that. If that problem persists, maybe better ask on linuxppc-dev or ask BenH directly.

Re: ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh)

2001-09-27 Thread Vinod Kurup
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 06:51:03PM -0600, Bradley C. Midgley wrote: > using the same config, the current 2.4-benh kernel (2.4.10-ben0) fails to > find my ide drive whereas an older benh kernel (2.4.5-pre3) finds it with > no trouble. [both have dma enabled and on by default; in fact the compile > f

Re: ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh)

2001-09-27 Thread Josh Huber
"Bradley C. Midgley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the newer kernel panics because it can't find root and i can't > scroll back but it appears that at least some the lines below, from > the working dmesg, are missing from the newer kernel's output. ^^^

Re: ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh)

2001-09-27 Thread Michael Schmitz
> devfs enabled, devfsd configured. my working kernel also uses devfs. > > i thought it was irrelevant though. before root is mounted, there is no > /dev to look up device numbers anyway. the kernel has its own rules and > it successfully decides /dev/hda11 is 03:0b but since the ide driver > d

Re: ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh)

2001-09-27 Thread Brad Midgley
devfs enabled, devfsd configured. my working kernel also uses devfs. i thought it was irrelevant though. before root is mounted, there is no /dev to look up device numbers anyway. the kernel has its own rules and it successfully decides /dev/hda11 is 03:0b but since the ide driver didn't find

Re: ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh)

2001-09-27 Thread Michael Schmitz
> pmac_ide: enabling IDE bus ID 0 > hda: IBM-DARA-212000, ATA DISK drive > ide0 at 0xcf002000-0xcf002007,0xcf002160 on irq 13 > hda: Enabling MultiWord DMA 2 > hda: 23579136 sectors (12073 MB) w/418KiB Cache, CHS=23392/16/63, (U)DMA > Partition check: > /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: [mac] p1 p

ide disk no longer found (rsync-benh)

2001-09-26 Thread Bradley C. Midgley
hi, using the same config, the current 2.4-benh kernel (2.4.10-ben0) fails to find my ide drive whereas an older benh kernel (2.4.5-pre3) finds it with no trouble. [both have dma enabled and on by default; in fact the compile fails if i don't do it that way] the newer kernel panics because it can