On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:40 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 17:20 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > http://gate.crashing.org/~benh/ppc64-smu-thermal-control.diff
>
> You may want to re-download this one if you got it already, I just fixed
> a bug in the calcu
Although i dont have an imac g5, i think that in general ben is on the
right track. its better to have something in place than nothing.
not putting down the feedback, but im not sure just how much fiddling
people will really want, and its not a huge audience. which
brings me back to the point of j
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 16:28 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > The algorithm itself is extracted from darwin. However, it's a rather
> > complex modified version of the PID algorithm, and thus it could use
> > some review to make sure I got everything right.
> >
>
> As
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The algorithm itself is extracted from darwin. However, it's a rather
> complex modified version of the PID algorithm, and thus it could use
> some review to make sure I got everything right.
>
As we are already in the digital domain, I would think it would be
mor
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 17:20 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> http://gate.crashing.org/~benh/ppc64-smu-thermal-control.diff
You may want to re-download this one if you got it already, I just fixed
a bug in the calculations of the CPU control loop. It's now getting
results much more consistan
Hi !
I now have some experimental thermal control and cpufreq support for
iMac G5. I have not _yet_ implemented support for the SMU based single
CPU desktops (PowerMac9,1), those will have to wait a little bit more
(not too much hopefully, but I need potential testers to contact me as I
lack hardw
6 matches
Mail list logo
