Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-06 Thread David Schleef
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:59:58AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:52:42AM -0700, David Schleef wrote: > > > > To me, the real bug is having N kernel header packages. I'm > > assuming that they all describe the same binary kernel interface, > > otherwise packages are forced

Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-06 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:28:41PM -0700, Matt Brubeck wrote: > On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > Do they have different patches applied? > > Yes. > Are the different arch patches compatible? If so, could all of the patches be applied; allowing us to create a single headers package w

Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-06 Thread Matt Brubeck
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote: > Do they have different patches applied? Yes. > If not, then the headers should be the same no matter what the > ${arch}.

Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-06 Thread Mike Fedyk
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:52:42AM -0700, David Schleef wrote: > > To me, the real bug is having N kernel header packages. I'm > > assuming that they all describe the same binary kernel interface, > > otherwise packages are forced depend on a particular type of > > kernel header. And if they al

Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-06 Thread Ben Collins
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:52:42AM -0700, David Schleef wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:53:29AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > The glibc build rules doesn't correctly find the headers installed. > > > There are bugs filed on this, both on glibc and kernel-headers (for > > > providing too many)

Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-06 Thread David Schleef
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:53:29AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > The glibc build rules doesn't correctly find the headers installed. > > There are bugs filed on this, both on glibc and kernel-headers (for > > providing too many) but I can't find the numbers because brainfood > > is down. > > The g

Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-06 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 09:58:03PM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:53:29AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > > The glibc build rules doesn't correctly find the headers installed. > > > There are bugs filed on this, both on glibc and kernel-headers (for > > > providing too m

Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-05 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:53:29AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > The glibc build rules doesn't correctly find the headers installed. > > There are bugs filed on this, both on glibc and kernel-headers (for > > providing too many) but I can't find the numbers because brainfood > > is down. > > The g

Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-05 Thread Ben Collins
> The glibc build rules doesn't correctly find the headers installed. > There are bugs filed on this, both on glibc and kernel-headers (for > providing too many) but I can't find the numbers because brainfood > is down. The glibc rules aren't responsible for "finding" anything. They are responsibl

Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-05 Thread David Schleef
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 07:48:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > So, wassup? > > The ppc build says: > 2.2.3-8 > should not autobuild this... Dan got tired of the brokenness? =) > 2.2.3-7 > won't autobuild -

Re: glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-05 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 12:57:28PM -0700, David Schleef wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 07:48:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > So, wassup? > > The ppc build says: > > 2.2.3-7 > > won't autobuild - depended on kernel-headers-2.4.5-sparc??? > Because o

glibc 2.2.3-9 on alpha/ppc

2001-08-04 Thread Anthony Towns
So, wassup? The ppc build says: 2.2.3-8 should not autobuild this... 2.2.3-7 won't autobuild - depended on kernel-headers-2.4.5-sparc??? 2.2.3-1 build conflicts fail