> On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:52:42AM -0700, David Schleef wrote:
> > To me, the real bug is having N kernel header packages. I'm
> > assuming that they all describe the same binary kernel interface,
> > otherwise packages are forced depend on a particular type of
> > kernel header. And if they all describe the same binary kernel
> > interface, why do we need N of them?
>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 10:59:58AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Some modules need to be built with the exact kernel headers from the
> kernel-image you are running.
>
Do they have different patches applied?
If not, then the headers should be the same no matter what the ${arch}.
MikeF
