eliminating the gcc-3.2-nof package?

2003-03-12 Thread Matthias Klose
Due to a missing shlibs entry I cannot see if anyone is actually using the -nof package. If not we could eliminate it... or just provide it for gcc-3.2 and stop providing it for gcc-3.3. Thanks, Matthias

Re: gcc-3.2: miscompilation on powerpc with -O2 or higher

2003-03-02 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! Just a followup note to say that I've reconfirmed this problem, and have a gdb trace. All is well with 2.95 -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer, but the following happens with gcc-3.2 with -O2 or greater: (For the time being, GCL lowers its gcc optimization to -O when using powerpc and

Re: problem with starting up lyx using Qt, compiled with gcc 3.2

2003-02-20 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Don, 2003-02-20 at 05:11, Nirmal Govind wrote: > > > The question remains: why not simply build against libqt3-dev? You > > probably need to get it from sid to build with g++ 3.2 though. > > The reason I didn't do that was cos the LyX developers mention somewhere > in the docs that qt *may* n

Re: problem with starting up lyx using Qt, compiled with gcc 3.2

2003-02-19 Thread Nirmal Govind
Thanks for the directions. > The question remains: why not simply build against libqt3-dev? You > probably need to get it from sid to build with g++ 3.2 though. The reason I didn't do that was cos the LyX developers mention somewhere in the docs that qt *may* need to be compiled with the same com

Re: problem with starting up lyx using Qt, compiled with gcc 3.2

2003-02-18 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Die, 2003-02-18 at 04:32, Nirmal Govind wrote: > Thanks a lot.. I checked and it was using the wrong libqt.so.3 from the > /usr/lib > directory instead of /usr/local/qt/lib.. I guess I have to set the > LD_LIBRARY_PATH? How do I do this for lyx to use the lib in /usr/local/qt/lib > without affe

Re: problem with starting up lyx using Qt, compiled with gcc 3.2

2003-02-17 Thread Nirmal Govind
Thanks a lot.. I checked and it was using the wrong libqt.so.3 from the /usr/lib directory instead of /usr/local/qt/lib.. I guess I have to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH? How do I do this for lyx to use the lib in /usr/local/qt/lib without affecting the path to other libraries? Currenly LD_LIBRARY_PATH

Re: problem with starting up lyx using Qt, compiled with gcc 3.2

2003-02-16 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Son, 2003-02-16 at 19:17, Nirmal Govind wrote: > > > Indeed, but the undefined symbol smells like Qt to me. Is it picking up > > the libqt.so.3 you built it against? > > > How do I find out? After I run configure, it does tell me that it is going to > use qt3.0.7.. but how do I check after com

Re: problem with starting up lyx using Qt, compiled with gcc 3.2

2003-02-16 Thread Nirmal Govind
> Why didn't you simply install libqt3-dev? The LyX developers have it in the INSTALL file that it might be necessary to use Qt compiled with the same compiler as LyX... so I compiled both of them... > Indeed, but the undefined symbol smells like Qt to me. Is it picking up > the libqt.so.3 you b

Re: problem with starting up lyx using Qt, compiled with gcc 3.2

2003-02-16 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Fre, 2003-02-14 at 22:30, Nirmal Govind wrote: > Hi.. I'm trying to get LyX (www.lyx.org) working on my ibook with the > benh kernel.. LyX uses Qt as a frontend so I downloaded and compiled qt > 3.0.7 with gcc 3.2.1. Why didn't you simply install libqt3-dev? > I then compiled lyx with gcc 3.

problem with starting up lyx using Qt, compiled with gcc 3.2

2003-02-14 Thread Nirmal Govind
Hi.. I'm trying to get LyX (www.lyx.org) working on my ibook with the benh kernel.. LyX uses Qt as a frontend so I downloaded and compiled qt 3.0.7 with gcc 3.2.1. I then compiled lyx with gcc 3.2.1.. compile goes fine but when I startup lyx I get the following error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/lyx-1.

Re: gcc-3.2

2002-09-10 Thread Mij
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 09:58:39 -0600 John Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am running the testing distribution and would like to add gcc-3.2 > from unstable. Are there any gotchas that people have experienced that > I need to consider? >From debian woody,

Re: gcc-3.2

2002-09-09 Thread Chris Tillman
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:58:39AM -0600, John Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I am running the testing distribution and would like to add gcc-3.2 > from unstable. Are there any gotchas that people have experienced that > I need to consider? I'm pretty sure there are issues wit

gcc-3.2

2002-09-09 Thread John Schmidt
Hi, I am running the testing distribution and would like to add gcc-3.2 from unstable. Are there any gotchas that people have experienced that I need to consider? Thanks, John Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]