you have facebook
hi debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, hope this e-mail finds you in good spirits!
Do you want to make some extra money with me? Do you wanna get in on this deal
with me? I'm sure I could double the $2000/month if I had your help.
http://bit.ly/f4S48c
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org hello, how are you doing? My New Year's
Resolution is to increase my salary. This program is the truth! I recommend
getting in on this ASAP! http://bit.ly/f98zZp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Ýyi günler,
Mekanik tesisat konusunda proje ve uygulama yapmaktayýz
Uygulama, As-built, Belediye projesi ve ihale dosyasý hazýrlamaktayýz.
Projeleriniz için teklif vermeyi bekliyoruz.bi...@mekanikproje.com
PROJE ÜCRETLERÝMÝZ 2.dönem (2010) TL
YAPI(m2) 2SINIF 3A SINIF 4A SIN
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 07:58 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On lun, 2007-09-03 at 21:44 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> > If you don't like that, become a DD
>
> So you have 2 years to search a good answer to his questions?
You forgot the other part: Throw a GR.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAI
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 06:31 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Notice that it was because i candidated for DPL, and because i wanted to
> change a certain amount of thngs in debian, that i was expulsed. Do you
> really think the DAMs will allow a DD who is supportive of me ? Have you
> not read Anthony To
On lun, 2007-09-03 at 21:44 -0500, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> If you don't like that, become a DD
So you have 2 years to search a good answer to his questions?
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 11:04 +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> > More people and DDs privately asked listmasters to place the ban again,
> > than the users asking for the ban to be lifted.
>
> Can you give names and numbers? Telling us there where some guys they
> asked for reinstate the ban of Sven is n
2007/9/3, Francesco Pedrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Monday 03 September 2007, Gunther Furtado wrote:
> > 2007/8/30, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > I object! Please don't lift the ban. After lifting the ban Sven has
> > > clearly shown, that he did not understand why he was banned fro
On Monday 03 September 2007, Gunther Furtado wrote:
> 2007/8/30, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I object! Please don't lift the ban. After lifting the ban Sven has
> > clearly shown, that he did not understand why he was banned from
> > the list and that he is not willing to change his b
2007/8/30, Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I object! Please don't lift the ban. After lifting the ban Sven has
> clearly shown, that he did not understand why he was banned from the
> list and that he is not willing to change his behaviour.
>
> Gaudenz
>
I second that. I feel, sadly, that
On Monday 03 September 2007, Mike Hore wrote:
[Snip]
I've read the archives, and I have to agree with Mike Hore.
I never talked to Sven directly and I don't know him, but as spectator I
think that he was threated unfairly and he doesn't deserve *any* of the
steps againist his contributions to de
I wrote:
Hi Julien,
Mike Hore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes -- I've only been reading the list for 6 months or so and to me
this action looks quite arbitrary and extreme -- IMHO of course --
some background would be very welcome. List regulars say things like
"we all know" and "it's obvious"
>
> For others' information, Sven has sent me a long description of what
> happened from his side, and he wants it to be available to anyone. He
> suggested I forward it to the list, but I think it might be OK if I just
> forward it by private email to anyone who asks me. I'm happy to do this.
Hi Julien,
Mike Hore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes -- I've only been reading the list for 6 months or so and to me
this action looks quite arbitrary and extreme -- IMHO of course --
some background would be very welcome. List regulars say things like
"we all know" and "it's obvious" -- but to
Mike Hore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes -- I've only been reading the list for 6 months or so and to me
> this action looks quite arbitrary and extreme -- IMHO of course --
> some background would be very welcome. List regulars say things like
> "we all know" and "it's obvious" -- but to me at
Jimmy Johnson wrote:
Don Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
So if someone would let us understand why Sven was banned in the
first place, then may be this whole sad affair can be brought to
some kind of closure.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2007/08/msg
Hi David,
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 20:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> nobody retracted his support to his comeback
>
> How are you so sure about that?
>
> More people and DDs privately asked listmasters to place the ban again,
> than the users askin
Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
>
>> So if someone would let us understand why Sven was banned in the
>> first place, then may be this whole sad affair can be brought to
>> some kind of closure.
>>
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2007/08/msg00115.
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> So if someone would let us understand why Sven was banned in the
> first place, then may be this whole sad affair can be brought to
> some kind of closure.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2007/08/msg00115.html is the
warning which was sent from li
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I object! Please don't lift the ban. After lifting the ban Sven has
clearly shown, that "he did not understand why he was banned" from the
list and that he is not willing to change his behaviour.
Gaudenz
That's just it!
Even before Sven was banned in the first plac
Hi
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:53:36PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:09:33PM +0200, xavier grave a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 30 août 2007 à 12:37 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> > >
> > > Note that i seem to be banned again from the debian-powerpc mailing
> > > list
>
> Hell
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 17:55 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > More people and DDs privately asked listmasters to place the ban again,
>
> We won't hide problems, does this remember you something ?
Yes, it does.
> > than the users asking for the ban to be lifted. The ban will remain in
> > place. Com
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 20:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> nobody retracted his support to his comeback
How are you so sure about that?
More people and DDs privately asked listmasters to place the ban again,
than the users asking for the ban to be lifted. The ban will remain in
place. Common sen
Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:09:33PM +0200, xavier grave a écrit :
Le jeudi 30 août 2007 à 12:37 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
Note that i seem to be banned again from the debian-powerpc mailing
list
Hello listmasters,
A few weeks ago the subscribers of deb
Le Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:09:33PM +0200, xavier grave a écrit :
> Le jeudi 30 août 2007 à 12:37 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> >
> > Note that i seem to be banned again from the debian-powerpc mailing
> > list
Hello listmasters,
A few weeks ago the subscribers of debian-powerpc have been asked
Article rejected, un-authorized poster of debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
Received: from lists.debian.org [80.199.172.254] by hjv.dk
(SMTPD32-7.13) id A2C7261700DC; Sun, 01 Feb 2004 21:34:15 +0100
From: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 21
On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 16:14, Gavin W. Burris aka 86 wrote:
> I recently ran into an issue compiling C++ code with var args.
> I was told that: this "feature" varies from compiler
> to compiler and architecture to architecture. Is there a way to
> compile code that has issues with va_list with G
Maybe instead of using:
va_list myVar = (va_list) otherVar;
you should use the more traditional approach with va_start (see man
va_start). I don't think va_list has a C++ constructor accepting
arguments, neither it has a cast operator (just a C struct in
stdargs.h).
Laur
On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 1
I recently ran into an issue compiling C++ code with var args.
I was told that: this "feature" varies from compiler
to compiler and architecture to architecture. Is there a way to
compile code that has issues with va_list with GCC on PowerPC?
The tarball of code can be found at:
http://prdownl
30 matches
Mail list logo
