>> No - I do NOT have aty128 compiled in, neither static or as a
>> module. I did not think dependencies work that way (i.e. it'd
>> SEEM more logical if newer hardware depended on older hardware,
>> but not older hardware on the drivers for the newer stuff). I
>> will compile it in and report ba
> No - I do NOT have aty128 compiled in, neither static or as a module. I
> did not think dependencies work that way (i.e. it'd SEEM more logical if
> newer hardware depended on older hardware, but not older hardware on the
> drivers for the newer stuff). I will compile it in and report back
> t
plied the .12-rc2 patch. Still no
video after booting. The last thing visible on the screen is:
setup_arch: bootmem
arch: exit
Hrm... and aty128fb is built into the kernel ? Very strange ... How many
connectors on you card ? Is the "other" connector working ?
Ben.
No - I do NOT have aty
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 22:58 -0700, Michael wrote:
> Ok, ben, I am slightly beyond a newbie, but not that far. Ummm, where to
> start. I have never used make oldconfig, didn't understand the manual
> page on zcat. Ok the process I have used is
> 1) Get source
> 2) Untar Source
> 3) make menucon
ake oldconfig shoudl take
care of that, it might still ask you for a few questions, but it should
get the bulk of the stuff in place). If you aren't too confident, you
can also just pull the config used by debian, do zcat /proc/config.gz
.config from a running debian ppc kernel then make oldc
l from ?
> >
> > ftp.kernel.org
> >
> > Ben.
>
> Pulled the 2.6.11.6 sources and applied the .12-rc2 patch. Still no
> video after booting. The last thing visible on the screen is:
>
> setup_arch: bootmem
> arch: exit
Hrm... and aty128fb is built
>> > Does upstream 2.6.12-rc2 work for you ?
>> >
>> > Ben.
>>
>> Don't know. I can give it a try tonight. Where do I pull the
>> sources
>> for this kernel from ?
>
> ftp.kernel.org
>
> Ben.
Pulled the 2.6.11.6 sources and applied the .12-rc2 patch. Still no
video after booting. The last thin
> > Does upstream 2.6.12-rc2 work for you ?
> >
> > Ben.
>
> Don't know. I can give it a try tonight. Where do I pull the sources
> for this kernel from ?
ftp.kernel.org
Ben.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
clicked in my head
afaik mean As Far As I Know, (sometimes I'm a bit slow on the uptake) I
actually compiled 2.6.11.6 two days ago and that didn't work for me, and
the last build I did I built aty128fb as a module, and was going to try
loading it after login, but I kept running out of sp
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 13:46, vinai wrote:
> Don't know. I can give it a try tonight. Where do I pull the sources
> for this kernel from ?
>
> vinai
www.kernel.org is usually referred to as 'upstream'.
Cheers,
David
pgplymXZn493i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 21:24 -0500, vinai wrote:
I am still unable to start my computer with video=aty128fb and X is
still complaining about no frame buffer devices, even though I have
/dev/fb1 - 9 or 8. I am utterly frustrated at this, and I have
night before last it actually clicked in my head
> >>afaik mean As Far As I Know, (sometimes I'm a bit slow on the uptake) I
> >>actually compiled 2.6.11.6 two days ago and that didn't work for me, and
> >>the last build I did I built aty128fb as a module, and
e) I
actually compiled 2.6.11.6 two days ago and that didn't work for me, and
the last build I did I built aty128fb as a module, and was going to try
loading it after login, but I kept running out of space on all my
partitions, so I am in the course of rebuilding my system now, and I may
e) I
actually compiled 2.6.11.6 two days ago and that didn't work for me, and
the last build I did I built aty128fb as a module, and was going to try
loading it after login, but I kept running out of space on all my
partitions, so I am in the course of rebuilding my system now, and I may
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 21:24 -0500, vinai wrote:
> > I am still unable to start my computer with video=aty128fb and X is
> > still complaining about no frame buffer devices, even though I have
> > /dev/fb1 - 9 or 8. I am utterly frustrated at this, and I have found
> > no
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 18:28 -0700, Michael wrote:
> I am still unable to start my computer with video=aty128fb and X is
> still complaining about no frame buffer devices, even though I have
> /dev/fb1 - 9 or 8. I am utterly frustrated at this, and I have found no
> help in anything
> I am still unable to start my computer with video=aty128fb and X is
> still complaining about no frame buffer devices, even though I have
> /dev/fb1 - 9 or 8. I am utterly frustrated at this, and I have found
> no help in anything I have read on line I can pass video=aty128fb
>
I am still unable to start my computer with video=aty128fb and X is
still complaining about no frame buffer devices, even though I have
/dev/fb1 - 9 or 8. I am utterly frustrated at this, and I have found no
help in anything I have read on line I can pass video=aty128fb argument
on the
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote:
> Le mardi 11 mars 2003, Alessandro Selli écrit :
> > Il giorno Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Nicolas Bertolissio così ha scritto:
> [...]
> > |aty128fb:1280x1024-75
> > |aty128fb:1600x1200-64
> >
> > Of course, you pu
Le mardi 11 mars 2003, Alessandro Selli écrit :
> Il giorno Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Nicolas Bertolissio così ha scritto:
[...]
> |aty128fb:1280x1024-75
> |aty128fb:1600x1200-64
>
> Of course, you put "video=" before those lines.
yes, I've alse tried with a `@'
Il giorno Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Nicolas Bertolissio così ha scritto:
|From: Nicolas Bertolissio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org
|Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:39:46 +0100
|Subject: Re: console: aty128fb on G4
[...]
|> Have you tried different resolutions?
|I t
Le mardi 11 mars 2003, Michel Dänzer écrit :
> On Son, 2003-03-09 at 16:12, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote:
> >
> > I've trouble in making aty128fb work on a G4, I have a kernel compiled
> > with make-kpkg from the last kernel-source-2.4.20 and kernel-patch-benh.
> >
On Son, 2003-03-09 at 16:12, Nicolas Bertolissio wrote:
>
> I've trouble in making aty128fb work on a G4, I have a kernel compiled
> with make-kpkg from the last kernel-source-2.4.20 and kernel-patch-benh.
>
> OFfb works fine but I can find how to run XFree with it, so I co
Hi,
I've trouble in making aty128fb work on a G4, I have a kernel compiled
with make-kpkg from the last kernel-source-2.4.20 and kernel-patch-benh.
OFfb works fine but I can find how to run XFree with it, so I compiled
aty128fb in the kernel instead but the screen is automatically turne
inux video=aty128fb
On Oct 15 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I looked through the list archives, and found nothing about it. Can
> anyone give me a clue? This is in reference to the "No screens"
> question I asked about a week ago.
This means that you shoud use the ATI Rage 128 framebuffer
when conf
I looked through the list archives, and found nothing about it. Can anyone give
me a clue? This is in reference to the "No screens" question I asked about a
week ago.
Thanks for your help!
Russell
On Fri, 2001-09-07 at 17:06, John Hughes wrote:
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
> /lib/modules/2.4.10-pre4-ben0/kernel/drivers/video/aty128fb.o
> depmod: mac_vmode_to_var
> depmod: get_backlight_enable
> depmod: mac_find_mode
Building aty128fb as a
Ok,
so I am yet again trying to get my ibook2, it's ati128 chipset,
XFree4.1,
DRI, and a very recent benh kernel to play nicely. Well, this time I got much
further than I ever havebut, well, still no go. Seems though, thats its
nearly there and I was hoping someone(ben?) could shed
Greetings,
I have a pmac 7600/233 and an AppleVision 1710 AV monitor, using a
"PCI: (0:14:0) ATI Rage 128 RE rev 0, Mem @ 0x8400/26,
0x8080/14, I/O @ 0x0400/8" video card. I am running 2.2.15pre19 from
benh's rsync, with only the aty128fb video driver enabled.
The troub
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Renaud Dreyer wrote:
>
> > P.S. Which of the precompiled fonts:
> >
> > CONFIG_FONT_8x16=y
> > CONFIG_FONT_SUN8x16=y
> > CONFIG_FONT_SUN12x22=y
> >
> > are used in the frame buffer console and how can I make it switch
> > from one set to another?
>
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Renaud Dreyer wrote:
> > > P.S. Which of the precompiled fonts:
> > >
> > > CONFIG_FONT_8x16=y
> > > CONFIG_FONT_SUN8x16=y
> > > CONFIG_FONT_SUN12x22=y
> > >
> > > are used in the frame buffer console and how can I make it switch
> > > from one set to another?
> >
> > All o
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Renaud Dreyer wrote:
> > > Renaud, try fbset -depth 8.
> > >
> >
> >
> > I tried that but I get a blank screen and:
> >
> > fbcon setup: no support for fontwidth 8
> > fbcon setup: type 0 (aux 0, depth 8) not supported
> >
> > Same at depths 16 and 24, even the .config f
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Renaud Dreyer wrote:
> > Renaud, try fbset -depth 8.
> >
>
>
> I tried that but I get a blank screen and:
>
> fbcon setup: no support for fontwidth 8
> fbcon setup: type 0 (aux 0, depth 8) not supported
>
> Same at depths 16 and 24, even the .config for my kernel has:
>
>
> Renaud Dreyer wrote:
>
> > rgba 8/16,8/8,8/0,8/24
>
> This looks like 32 bpp.
>
>
> Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> > rgba 8/0,8/0,8/0,0/0
>
> This looks like 8 bpp!
>
>
> Renaud, try fbset -depth 8.
>
I tried that but I get a blank screen and:
fbcon setup: no support for fontwidth 8
Renaud Dreyer wrote:
> rgba 8/16,8/8,8/0,8/24
This looks like 32 bpp.
Ethan Benson wrote:
> rgba 8/0,8/0,8/0,0/0
This looks like 8 bpp!
Renaud, try fbset -depth 8.
Michel
--
Therapy is expensive, popping bubble wrap is cheap. You choose.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 01:01:05PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Renaud Dreyer wrote:
>
> > > Possible. Have you tried other depths? As the console has only 16 colors
> > > anyway, there's no point in running it at more than 8 bpp...
> >
> > I'll try that next, but I know someone on a B&W G3 (wit
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Renaud Dreyer wrote:
> > Renaud Dreyer wrote:
> > > Frame buffer device information:
> > > Name: ATY Rage128
> > > Address : 0x8400
> > > Size: 16777216
> > > Type: PACKED PIXELS
> > > Visual : DIRECTCOLOR
> > > XPanS
> Renaud Dreyer wrote:
>
> > > Possible. Have you tried other depths? As the console has only 16 colors
> > > anyway, there's no point in running it at more than 8 bpp...
> >
> > I'll try that next, but I know someone on a B&W G3 (with Rage128)
> > who gets accelerated console and the same
> > "
Renaud Dreyer wrote:
> > Possible. Have you tried other depths? As the console has only 16 colors
> > anyway, there's no point in running it at more than 8 bpp...
>
> I'll try that next, but I know someone on a B&W G3 (with Rage128)
> who gets accelerated console and the same
> " Accelerator : Un
> Renaud Dreyer wrote:
>
> > Frame buffer device information:
> > Name: ATY Rage128
> > Address : 0x8400
> > Size: 16777216
> > Type: PACKED PIXELS
> > Visual : DIRECTCOLOR
> > XPanStep: 8
> > YPanStep: 1
> > YWrapStep
Renaud Dreyer wrote:
> Frame buffer device information:
> Name: ATY Rage128
> Address : 0x8400
> Size: 16777216
> Type: PACKED PIXELS
> Visual : DIRECTCOLOR
> XPanStep: 8
> YPanStep: 1
> YWrapStep : 0
> LineLength
0
MMIO Size : 8191
Accelerator : Unknown (32)
Is the "Accelerator: Uknown (32)" a sign of problems? maybe there's
no acceleration at 32 bit?
Here are the relevant lines in dmesg:
MacOS display is /bandit/ATY,Rage128o
aty128fb: Rage128 [rev 0x2] 16M
Console: switching to c
is very fast.
>
> I tredi to solve the problem the following way:
>
> *Compiled and installed Paul's stable 2.2.15pre7 kernel, which I
> believe includes Ben's latest aty128fb patch.
>
> *Booted with No Video Driver unchecked, and kernel arguments:
>
is painfully obvious while using dselect. I have
no problem with accelerated X (Xpmac.rage128), which is very fast.
I tredi to solve the problem the following way:
*Compiled and installed Paul's stable 2.2.15pre7 kernel, which I
believe includes Ben's latest aty128fb patch.
*Boot
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000, Renaud Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still plagued with a very slow console and as far as ever from
>a solution.
>
>I have a PowerMac 7300/200 with a Rage 128 Card. I boot into Debian
>using BootX. I use a "pure" 2.2.14 kernel
I'm still plagued with a very slow console and as far as ever from
a solution.
I have a PowerMac 7300/200 with a Rage 128 Card. I boot into Debian
using BootX. I use a "pure" 2.2.14 kernel with the aty128fb patch
only.
Whether I boot with "no video driver chec
47 matches
Mail list logo
