Michel Lanners writes:
> On 22 May, this message from Albert D. Cahalan echoed through cyberspace:
>> Michel Lanners writes:
>>> On 22 May, this message from Albert D. Cahalan echoed through cyberspace:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog writes:
>>> And don't forget the loop counter and some increment...
>
On 22 May, this message from Albert D. Cahalan echoed through cyberspace:
> Michel Lanners writes:
>> On 22 May, this message from Albert D. Cahalan echoed through cyberspace:
>>> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog writes:
>
>> [about fast memcopy in asm]
>>
>>> dcbt eight,src/* prefetch the next cac
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:52:56PM +0200, Michel Lanners wrote:
> On 22 May, this message from Albert D. Cahalan echoed through cyberspace:
> > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog writes:
> [abot fast memcopy in asm]
> >
> > dcbt eight,src/* prefetch the next cache line */
> > loop_top:
> > dcba eig
Michel Lanners writes:
> On 22 May, this message from Albert D. Cahalan echoed through cyberspace:
>> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog writes:
> [abot fast memcopy in asm]
>
>> dcbt eight,src/* prefetch the next cache line */
>> loop_top:
>> dcba eight,dst/* allocate a cache line */
>>
On 22 May, this message from Albert D. Cahalan echoed through cyberspace:
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog writes:
[abot fast memcopy in asm]
>
> dcbt eight,src/* prefetch the next cache line */
> loop_top:
> dcba eight,dst/* allocate a cache line */
> lfd f11,8,(src)
> lfd f12,
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog writes:
> According to my tests, cacheable_memcpy is approximately 40%
> faster than the original glibc version, which is quite an
> improvement: with my tests, the glibc version took approx. 69s
> to run, while the cacheable_memcpy took only 42s (repeate
On 20 May, this message from Rogério Brito echoed through cyberspace:
> Anyway, one of the first things I see is that xine uses a
> function called xine_fast_memcpy, which is an alternative
> memcpy function possibly written in assembly (if available) or
> the standard glib
On May 21 2002, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, one of the first things I see is that xine uses a
> > function called xine_fast_memcpy, which is an alternative
> > memcpy function possibly written in assembly (if available) or
> > the sta
Hi.
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, one of the first things I see is that xine uses a
> function called xine_fast_memcpy, which is an alternative
> memcpy function possibly written in assembly (if available) or
> the standard glibc, if no other version i
Dear people,
As you probably know, I am trying what I can to play DVDs well
in my (now outdated) :-) iBook 600MHz, combo, which features a
G3 processor.
I starting to learn PPC assembly and just from reading a bit
of Motorola's MPC750 User's Guide,
10 matches
Mail list logo
