Chad Miller wrote:
>
> I wonder if some kind soul who's using kernel 2.2.x on a yabooted Lombard
> could post a working X4 config file? I'm hoping that my problem is
> ineptitude at writing a correct XF89Config-4 file.
It's not only a matter of that. You need to build from Ani Joshi's tree. Or
I wonder if some kind soul who's using kernel 2.2.x on a yabooted Lombard
could post a working X4 config file? I'm hoping that my problem is
ineptitude at writing a correct XF89Config-4 file.
- chad
--
Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Policeman
Chad:
> > But damn! it blanks and sleep(120)s and reboots like the first x4 did.
On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 05:42:38PM +0100, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Lemme guess - still using BootX instead of yaboot?
Bt. Nice try, though. :)
I'm going to build it again, and make sure I jump through all the
> But damn! it blanks and sleep(120)s and reboots like the first x4 did.
Lemme guess - still using BootX instead of yaboot?
Michael
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 07:06:20PM +, Sergio Brandano wrote:
> I am posting the solution to the above problem,
> in the hope that the package maintainers will
> actually see this mail and will update the
> binary trees overnight.
Thanks, Sergio. I too hope it's packaged soon.
But damn!
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:37:07AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Quoting Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:20:46AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > Sergio Brandano wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am posting the solution to the above problem, in the hope that
> > the
>
Quoting Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:20:46AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > Sergio Brandano wrote:
> > >
> > > I am posting the solution to the above problem, in the hope that
> the
> > > package maintainers will actually see this mail and will update the
> bin
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:20:46AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Sergio Brandano wrote:
> >
> > I am posting the solution to the above problem, in the hope that the
> > package maintainers will actually see this mail and will update the binary
> > trees overnight.
>
> Dream on. It's not Brande
Sergio Brandano wrote:
>
> I am posting the solution to the above problem, in the hope that the
> package maintainers will actually see this mail and will update the binary
> trees overnight.
Dream on. It's not Branden's fault that Ani can't seem to get the
modifications in his tree integrated
I am posting the solution to the above problem,
in the hope that the package maintainers will
actually see this mail and will update the
binary trees overnight.
Sergio
>Subject: Re: Advise needed on Mach64
>From: Ani Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:03:51 -0800 (PST) (1
10 matches
Mail list logo