Phillip R. Jaenke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> I'll buy that, since upon closer inspection, the 'P' seems to typically
> indicate that it's a PCI bus system from further investigation. Still
> haven't found any full specs on it. Question remains, is the 601 gonna
> work? If the 601 is b
> "Phillip" == Phillip R Jaenke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Phillip> On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 05:12:38PM +0200, Adrian Phillips
Phillip> wrote:
>> This is off the top of my head (but reasonably reliable
>> :-). The 40P is a 66MHz 601 based PowerPC, PCI/ISA bus, single
>> pro
On Tue, Aug 24, 1999 at 05:12:38PM +0200, Adrian Phillips wrote:
> This is off the top of my head (but reasonably reliable :-). The 40P
> is a 66MHz 601 based PowerPC, PCI/ISA bus, single processor only
> model. It was the first of the PCI PowerPC workstations released I
> believe (43P came out som
> "Phillip" == Phillip R Jaenke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Phillip> On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:17:03AM -0700, Matt Porter
Phillip> wrote:
>> BTW, I did some searching around and still can't find anything
>> that clearly states what architecture a 40P is. Just some
>> vag
I just obtained the latest 2.2.12 kernel images from
ftp://ftp.ppc.kernel.org/pub/linuxppc/kernel-images/v2.2.12-990820/
and tried both prep and chrp on this machine. They both had the same
net result (hung the machine on what appears as a graphics error, but
don't really know). However, the p
On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 09:17:03AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
>
> BTW, I did some searching around and still can't find anything that
> clearly states what architecture a 40P is. Just some vague references to
> them working under Linux. Seems that is a 43P is PReP arch then a 40P
> would be as we
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, James D. Freels wrote:
> Hartmut,
>
> Sorry about sending this e-mail public, but the following 2 e-mail
> addresses failed:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Being desparate, I am sending to the list as last resort to try and
> find Hartmut.
This address works
"James D. Freels" wrote:
>
> Ok. Thanks for the info. In my ramblings through all the web pages
> on linux-ppc, I seem to remember a cross-compile from x86 to ppc howto
> somewhere. Since I do build kernels for x86 and alpha frequently, I
> would feel it an interesting task to tackle. Could
Ok. Thanks for the info. In my ramblings through all the web pages
on linux-ppc, I seem to remember a cross-compile from x86 to ppc howto
somewhere. Since I do build kernels for x86 and alpha frequently, I
would feel it an interesting task to tackle. Could you point me to
that web page that gi
On Aug 22, James D. Freels wrote:
> Hartmut,
>
> Sorry about sending this e-mail public, but the following 2 e-mail
> addresses failed:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Being desparate, I am sending to the list as last resort to try and
> find Hartmut.
I believe it's actually "kopt
"James D. Freels" wrote:
>
> Hartmut,
>
> Sorry about sending this e-mail public, but the following 2 e-mail
> addresses failed:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Being desparate, I am sending to the list as last resort to try and
> find Hartmut.
>
> ___
11 matches
Mail list logo
