Hi,
Frank Scheiner wrote:
> > I believe you
> > can't have both FAT as OF bootstrap partition **and** blessing.
The only way would be that Apple had defined some protocol using the
specified capabilities of FAT, by which blessing and other Apple-specific
file properties can be expressed, and that
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> What's the alternative HFS+ tree of the ISO? Does it write a small HFS+
> filesystem onto the ISO image?
Alternative trees are tradition in ISO 9660: Joliet, ISO 9660:1999, UDF.
They can refer to the same data file content as the ISO 9660 tree, but
have thei
Hello!
On Wed, 2023-05-10 at 10:03 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> > I just don't know how to bless a bootloader located on a FAT partition.
> > I know that xorriso does it and it works on ISO9660 filesystems, but I
> > don't understand how.
>
> xorriso attributes bles
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> I just don't know how to bless a bootloader located on a FAT partition.
> I know that xorriso does it and it works on ISO9660 filesystems, but I
> don't understand how.
xorriso attributes blessing to an alternative HFS+ tree of the ISO.
This HFS+ tree is advertise
Hi Stan!
Apologies for the late reply!
On Tue, 2023-05-02 at 12:35 -0600, Stan Johnson wrote:
> On 5/2/23 7:24 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > The former issue could be resolved if someone could find out how to boot
> > a PowerPC Mac from a FAT32 boot partition. It's suppose
Hi Adrian,
On 5/2/23 7:24 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> ...
>
> The former issue could be resolved if someone could find out how to boot
> a PowerPC Mac from a FAT32 boot partition. It's supposed to work but I never
> verified that.
>
> If someone could test that, I can implement that a
Hello Alex!
On Sun, 2023-04-30 at 09:08 -0700, Alex Perez wrote:
> This does not appear to have happened (new images)
>
> Is it something you can automate, or quasi-automate?
Unfortunately not. It requires some manual intervention at the moment,
especially for the PowerPC images as I have to ma
This does not appear to have happened (new images)
Is it something you can automate, or quasi-automate?
On 4/9/2023 11:16:01 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2023, at 4:54 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 6:38 PM Ken Cunningham
> wrote:
>>
>> Your issue is
> On Apr 10, 2023, at 4:54 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 6:38 PM Ken Cunningham
> wrote:
>>
>> Your issue is in French, but it looks like the one I recently faced as well
>> if I am reading it correctly.
>>
>> I fixed it using the information on this page:
>>
>> ht
On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 6:38 PM Ken Cunningham
wrote:
>
> Your issue is in French, but it looks like the one I recently faced as well
> if I am reading it correctly.
>
> I fixed it using the information on this page:
>
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/75807/no-public-key-available-on-apt
Your issue is in French, but it looks like the one I recently faced as well if
I am reading it correctly.
I fixed it using the information on this page:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/75807/no-public-key-available-on-apt-get-update
I hope this helps you too.
Ken
> On Apr 9, 2023
Le 09/04/2023 à 23:09, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
Hello David!
On Apr 9, 2023, at 10:02 PM, David VANTYGHEM
wrote:
If someone could help me please. I have no idea of the problem.
Please provide the syslog file that is stored as /var/log/syslog
during installation. It’s otherwise
Hello David!
> On Apr 9, 2023, at 10:02 PM, David VANTYGHEM
> wrote:
>
> If someone could help me please. I have no idea of the problem.
>
Please provide the syslog file that is stored as /var/log/syslog during
installation. It’s otherwise not possible to debug the problem.
Adrian
Hi Harold!
On 6/3/19 5:46 PM, Harold Grove wrote:
> Thanks for putting this installer together. Unfortunately, I get an
> 'invalid Architectures in Release file for sid' error. Attached are
> the installer logs.
>From your log file:
Jun 3 14:54:39 choose-mirror[26217]: DEBUG: command: wget --no
On 12/06/2017 03:39 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
Awesome, the window manager, crashes the system at times. Such
crashes are what I'm used to with this machine even with an older
previous Debian install - Debian 8, IIRC, and a different X,
without awesome. But that crash might be a hardware issue:
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 19:51:47 +0100
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> [ ... ]
> Awesome, the window manager, crashes the system at times. Such
> crashes are what I'm used to with this machine even with an older
> previous Debian install - Debian 8, IIRC, and a different X,
> without awesome. But that cra
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:13:58 +0100
Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:37:24PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > [ ... ]
>
> Ok, thanks, I don't have the keyboard configuration file at hand, but
> it was something like lv3:enter_switch in the keyboard options.
Bingo!! That was
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:37:24PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:34:11 +0100
> Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:12:24 +0100
> > Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > The latter one: mine is from ~2001:
> > "Command (Apple) key followed by KP_
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:37:24 +0100
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:34:11 +0100
> Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:12:24 +0100
> > Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > The latter one: mine is from ~2001:
> > "Command (Apple) key followed by KP_Enter"
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:34:11 +0100
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:12:24 +0100
> Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> The latter one: mine is from ~2001:
> "Command (Apple) key followed by KP_Enter"
> On this image it's the left one:
> https://images.techhive.com/images/articl
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:12:24 +0100
Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:51:47PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 02:09:20 +0100
> > Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> > Console:
> > I didn't find any bar key ("|") there, which is a real PITA, and
> > the
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 07:51:47PM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 02:09:20 +0100
> Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 00:50:01 +0100
> > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >
> > > On 12/04/2017 12:14 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > > I have to r
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 02:09:20 +0100
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 00:50:01 +0100
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>
> > On 12/04/2017 12:14 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > I have to rebuild debian-installer to match the 4.14 kernel. The
> > > current version of debi
On 12/04/2017 07:45 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>> Looks good. But as I said, I don't know for how long Yaboot will
>> be around as it's currently being replaced.
>
> No problem for me as long as GRUB will have some usable option to
> boot a ppc installer from inside OF, as yaboot perfectly seem
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:11:07 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 01:26 AM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> [ ]
> >>> No wayland, under no circumstances. Please! .. :)
> >>
> >> Why not? Wayland actually uses *less* resources than X, much less.
> >> [ ... ]
> >
> > The "l
On 12/04/2017 01:26 AM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> I forgot this - no idea whether it's important:
> Yaboot (?) says after booting someth. like this:
> "Warning: Bootstrap partition type is wrong: "Apple_HFS"
> type should be "Apple_Bootstrap""
We're working on replacing Yaboot for
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 02:09:20 +0100
Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> Aborting the install crashed - but that might be a hardware, not
Aborting the install crashed - but that might be a hardware
should say:
Aborting the install crashed - but that might be a hardware issue
Sorry
Wolfgang
--
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 00:50:01 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 12:14 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > I have to rebuild debian-installer to match the 4.14 kernel. The
> > current version of debian-installer on the installation images is
> > built against 4.13 but unsta
Hi Adrian, hi All
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 00:14:50 +0100
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang!
>
> On 12/03/2017 11:59 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > "No kernel modules were found. This probably is due to a mismatch
> > between the kernel used by this version of the installer and the
> >
On 12/04/2017 12:14 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I have to rebuild debian-installer to match the 4.14 kernel. The current
> version of debian-installer on the installation images is built against
> 4.13 but unstable has kernel 4.14. I will fix this tomorrow.
I have done this now although
Hi Wolfgang!
On 12/03/2017 11:59 PM, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> "No kernel modules were found. This probably is due to a mismatch
> between the kernel used by this version of the installer and the kernel
> version available in the archive.
Thanks for the heads-up, I knew I would have forgotten so
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 03:29:27AM -0700, Michael Crawford wrote:
> I need help understanding how to use the initrd that the installer
> places in my /boot directory. I'm trying to install on an external
> FireWire drive on a second-generation iBook. I'm trying to avoid
> repartitioning my intern
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 02:28:58PM +0200, Magnus Sandberg wrote:
> Can I verify the quik installation, or run it manually an extra time by
> entering the shell? Should I verify (with mac-fdisk) that some partition
> has the boot-flag? It seams that OpenFirmware don't recognize any bootable
> dis
SM: +46-70-205 81 84 |
\---/
|| ||
ooO Ooo
- On 12th of August 2005 Holger Levsen wrote; -
Subject: Re: Installer problems on Beige PowerMac G3
From: Holger Levs
Hi,
On Wednesday 10 August 2005 17:56, Magnus Sandberg wrote:
> I have some problems installing Debian Sarge on my OldWorld PowerMac.
> I sent a bug report to the bugtracking system;
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2005/08/msg00288.html
>
> Does any one has any ideas regarding thies problems
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:36:13AM -0800, Joaquin Menchaca wrote:
> Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>
> >Hi!
> >
> >Since I had access for some power4 and power5 System the last time and
> >noticed that
> >the debian installer didn't work on this hardware (a 64bit kernel
> >seems to be needed),
> >I did
Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Hi!
Since I had access for some power4 and power5 System the last time and
noticed that
the debian installer didn't work on this hardware (a 64bit kernel
seems to be needed),
I did some integration on this and added a "pseries" target to the
debian installer including
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 04:05:53PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Am 20.12.2004 um 15:59 schrieb Sven Luther:
>
> [...]
>
> >Mmm, not sure about this, debian-boot@lists.debian.org would be the
> >best place
> >to ask about this. Did you try the network-console installation ?
>
> It's a bit hig
Am 20.12.2004 um 15:59 schrieb Sven Luther:
[...]
Mmm, not sure about this, debian-boot@lists.debian.org would be the
best place
to ask about this. Did you try the network-console installation ?
It's a bit high traffic there. I've asked some questions there, but
never got answers,
maybe th
Am 20.12.2004 um 15:37 schrieb Sven Luther:
[...]
works fine.
Besides this, only a 2.6.9+ makes sense because of the included
virtualization
features. The 2.6.8(.1) did not boot a p670 at all, while the p615
and
new power5
machines did.o
Yep, i am working on real 64bit kernels, but saddly la
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:47:41PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> I've subscribed to the list, if it's used or not. I'd like to
> participate in the ppc64
> stuff, sure. All development takes place at the ppc64 project on alioth?
Cool.
Well, it is a matter of some dispute. The original ppc64 gu
Am 20.12.2004 um 14:37 schrieb Sven Luther:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 02:19:06PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Am 20.12.2004 um 13:59 schrieb Sven Luther:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 10:49:32AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Hi!
Since I had access for some power4 and power5 System the last time
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 03:19:28PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>
> Am 20.12.2004 um 14:37 schrieb Sven Luther:
>
> >On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 02:19:06PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> >>
> >>Am 20.12.2004 um 13:59 schrieb Sven Luther:
> >>
> >>>On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 10:49:32AM +0100, Cajus Pol
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 12:38:12AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Why won't the 32bit power4 kernels boot on these machines ? They should,
> > only
> > the iseries really need a 64bit kernel.
>
> The 32bit kernel does not have the pseries LPAR interfaces and so will
> not boot on
Hi,
> Why won't the 32bit power4 kernels boot on these machines ? They should, only
> the iseries really need a 64bit kernel.
The 32bit kernel does not have the pseries LPAR interfaces and so will
not boot on a partitioned POWER4 box or any POWER5 box.
Anton
Am 20.12.2004 um 13:59 schrieb Sven Luther:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 10:49:32AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
Hi!
Since I had access for some power4 and power5 System the last time and
noticed that
the debian installer didn't work on this hardware (a 64bit kernel
seems
to be needed),
I did s
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 02:19:06PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>
> Am 20.12.2004 um 13:59 schrieb Sven Luther:
>
> >On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 10:49:32AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> >>Hi!
> >>
> >>Since I had access for some power4 and power5 System the last time and
> >>noticed that
> >>the d
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 10:49:32AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Since I had access for some power4 and power5 System the last time and
> noticed that
> the debian installer didn't work on this hardware (a 64bit kernel seems
> to be needed),
> I did some integration on this and added a
> On 11 Apr, this message from Chris Tillman echoed through cyberspace:
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 12:08:44PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> When I go to "Partition Hard Drive", from the 3.0 .iso image, the
> >> default number of blocks is:
> >>
> >>
> >> size of 'device' is 1073741825 blo
On 11 Apr, this message from Chris Tillman echoed through cyberspace:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 12:08:44PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> When I go to "Partition Hard Drive", from the 3.0 .iso image, the
>> default number of blocks is:
>>
>>
>> size of 'device' is 1073741825 blocks:
>>
>>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 12:08:44PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello -
>
> Powerbook G3 400 Pismo
>
> When I go to "Partition Hard Drive", from the 3.0 .iso image, the default
> number of blocks is:
>
>
> size of 'device' is 1073741825 blocks:
>
>
> This suggests that I have 512.0G
I was able to set a good yaboot.conf file and now I can boot.
The only problem that remains is that I can only boot from Open
Firmware.
When the computer boots, I get the screen with my choices (the ones that
are on the yaboot.conf: linux, osx, os9, cd and of.
If I choose anything other than of
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Pan wrote:
[ONCE AGAIN] please answer UNDER the previous post it's easier to read
and please cut what's not usefull
> Apparently the disk is /dev/hda for the installer, but it's ultra2 for
> OF.
yes
> I have to reboot the machine, and if I go to the OF promp
> When I reboot the system after this, I get a white screen... nothing
> happens. I have to reboot the machine, and if I go to the OF prompt, I
> can type 'boot ultra2:9,yaboot'.
>
> BUT, on the next screen, when I try to just hit enter (or type Linux and
> then enter, doesn't matter) it says
>
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 20:18, Pan wrote:
> Ok... here's what I don't understand.
>
> Apparently the disk is /dev/hda for the installer, but it's ultra2 for
> OF.
>
> I reinstalled everything, and then run this command:
>
> mkofboot --boot /dev/hda9 -m /usr/lib/yaboot/ofboot --root \
> /
Ok... here's what I don't understand.
Apparently the disk is /dev/hda for the installer, but it's ultra2 for
OF.
I reinstalled everything, and then run this command:
mkofboot --boot /dev/hda9 -m /usr/lib/yaboot/ofboot --root \
/dev/hda11 --partition 11
It runs fine, and it creates the
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Pan wrote:
> I tried swaping the drive to the ATA66 bus... but after doing so and being
> able to install the base system, I get a white screen when I boot up.
>
> I can't even get to the Open Firmware prompt... and not even pressing
> option gives me a list of available driv
I tried swaping the drive to the ATA66 bus... but after doing so and being able
to install the base system, I get a white screen when I boot up.
I can't even get to the Open Firmware prompt... and not even pressing
option gives me a list of available drives to boot from...
Benja
On Sat, Nov 09,
On 9 Nov 2002, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > but BenH recommend to not use the disk for important datas (as the whole
> > system is)
>
> So far, I didn't get any report of problems with it though.
OK, I'll open the box and try to put the main disk on the ATA100 bus,
and tell you the results.
> but BenH recommend to not use the disk for important datas (as the whole
> system is)
So far, I didn't get any report of problems with it though.
Ben.
On Fri, 8 Nov 2002, Pan wrote:
> I just got a new dual proc 867 and I wanted to install debian on it.
done the same on a dual 1.25
> I downloaded one of the network install images and after burning it, I
> rebooted the machine. It boots fine, but... it doesn't see hda... no
> hard drive.
> Any
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 01:36:16PM -0500, Pan wrote:
> I just got a new dual proc 867 and I wanted to install debian on it.
>
> Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? or if this is a know bug...
There was some discussion on the list a while ago about this. The
primary IDE channel on the new dual G4 mode
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 03:27:11AM -0300, Peter Cordes wrote:
> gzipping a gzipped file doesn't make it any smaller, so compressing before
> making it part of the filesystem won't save space. The larger filesystem
> created by leaving it uncompressed will be matched by the better
> compressabili
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 09:34:50PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 04:41:59PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> > >>
> > >> nano-tiny -T15 -v /help.txt
> > >
> > > why not zcat /help.gz | more ?
> >
> > That would work, but I used tabs to make two columns; using the editor let
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 04:41:59PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> >>
> >> nano-tiny -T15 -v /help.txt
> >
> > why not zcat /help.gz | more ?
>
> That would work, but I used tabs to make two columns; using the editor lets
> me choose how much space for a tab so it's more readable and also gives
>>
>> nano-tiny -T15 -v /help.txt
>
> why not zcat /help.gz | more ?
That would work, but I used tabs to make two columns; using the editor lets
me choose how much space for a tab so it's more readable and also gives the
novice an interface to use to search for keywords, and scroll back and
fo
On Sun, Mar 07, 1999 at 03:05:30AM +0100, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> > > How is the installer coming? Where are the current versions?
> >
> > Not very well, right now. Hopefully I'll be working on it tonight or
> > tomorrow.
>
> Dan, sorry, but please make one step after the other. Is egcs, xfree
> How is the installer coming? Where are the current versions?
>
If you want really to work on this, i put then the newest
soure on
http://powerpc.debian.org/~koptein/boot-floppies.tar.gz
But wait some minutes :-)
Greetings,
Hartmut
> > How is the installer coming? Where are the current versions?
>
> Not very well, right now. Hopefully I'll be working on it tonight or
> tomorrow.
Dan, sorry, but please make one step after the other. Is egcs, xfree and
mozilla ready? You shouldn't start all projects and get noone out.
Sor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 6 Mar 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > How is the installer coming? Where are the current versions?
>
> Not very well, right now. Hopefully I'll be working on it tonight or
> tomorrow.
If you don't mind, I'd like to snag the source, and see if I ca
On Sat, Mar 06, 1999 at 06:05:57PM -0700, Cort Dougan wrote:
> How is the installer coming? Where are the current versions?
>
Not very well, right now. Hopefully I'll be working on it tonight or
tomorrow.
Dan
/\ /\
| Danie
71 matches
Mail list logo
