On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:43:21PM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> "Branden Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Out of curiosity, do you regard *this* message as a flame?
>
> No, happily, this is one the more reasoned replies you made, thanks.
My message to Sr. Climent was no more infla
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 03:02:08PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> I reasoned that pointing out his error would be sufficient to prompt him
> to rectify it, as I expected that he was an ethical person. Instead,
> his reaction has been to remove the entire work. Perhaps he feels that
> it is b
"Branden Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Out of curiosity, do you regard *this* message as a flame?
No, happily, this is one the more reasoned replies you made, thanks.
I would like to know what your intent was. Did you wish to express
anger? Did you wish to make people on this list awar
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 09:58:26AM -0700, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
> If I hadn't seen you in action for 3 years I probably would have done
> exactly the same thing.
I cannot tell if this is a compliment or an insult; you're going to have
to spell it out for me, I guess. :)
> > The best solution i
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 11:48, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [Colin: see the end of this message]
I still read -powerpc, but I am admittedly a bit behind on my email in
general lately...
> Colin, do you assert copyright in the modifications you provided to my
> iBook page? As I recall they were pretty
"Branden Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I give up.
>
> I think this reaction is just about the least constructive possible.
If I hadn't seen you in action for 3 years I probably would have done
exactly the same thing.
> The best solution is really quite simple; give credit where cred
[Colin: see the end of this message]
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 09:11:41AM -0500, bill traynor wrote:
> As both of your instructions (and a few others) proved invaluable in
> getting Debian onto my iBook2, I'd be more than willing to compile an
> amalgamated HOWTO with full acknowledgement of all ori
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:51:47PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> I have taken down my page.
Did anyone ask you to?
> Just a short look at the cache from google reveals your page has not
> been updated since April 17th, which means a long time.
That's correct. I get little feedback on the page.
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 08:51, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:13:56AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:30:40AM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> > > No. Fast as hell.
> > >
> > > Check www.hispalinux.es/~data/ibook/ for details.
> >
> > Wow, that looks fa
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:13:56AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:30:40AM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> > No. Fast as hell.
> >
> > Check www.hispalinux.es/~data/ibook/ for details.
>
> Wow, that looks familiar:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~branden/ibook.html
It do
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:40:40PM +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> "Copyleft" is a made-up word, a pun on "copyright". All the creations
> are either copyrighted or public domain. Being "copyleft" doesn't mean
> anything.
Well, it does have a meaning. But it necessarily implies copyright. It
mean
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 23:00, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:03:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > ...and then asserted your own copyright, exclusively, on the result.
>
> It is not a copyright, but a copyleft. And there is much of my own
> collecting.
Try and find "co
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:03:51PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> ...and then asserted your own copyright, exclusively, on the result.
It is not a copyright, but a copyleft. And there is much of my own
collecting.
> But I don't insist that you do anything in particular. You want the
> world
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:48:17PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> I mixed many documents found on the "links" section.
...and then asserted your own copyright, exclusively, on the result.
> I can provide credits to all of them, if you wish me to.
That's between you and your conscience. Or betwee
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:13:56AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:30:40AM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> > No. Fast as hell.
> >
> > Check www.hispalinux.es/~data/ibook/ for details.
>
> Wow, that looks familiar:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~branden/ibook.html
>
>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:30:40AM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> No. Fast as hell.
>
> Check www.hispalinux.es/~data/ibook/ for details.
Wow, that looks familiar:
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ibook.html
This document describes the installation of Debian 3.0 on an iBook2. I am
writing t
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 03:34:11AM -0800, Mark Williams wrote:
>
> >
> > No. Fast as hell.
> >
> > Check www.hispalinux.es/~data/ibook/ for details.
> >
>
> Oh man. I just put your XF86Config-4 in the place of mine, and it does run
> fast! quakeforge runs even better...
>
> I'm never doing s
>
> No. Fast as hell.
>
> Check www.hispalinux.es/~data/ibook/ for details.
>
Oh man. I just put your XF86Config-4 in the place of mine, and it does run
fast! quakeforge runs even better...
I'm never doing school work again.
Thanks!
Mark
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:11:51PM -0800, Mark Williams wrote:
>
> > Solved setting x to 1024 and y to 768.
> >
> > Works great, but i am not able to complete the first race (bunny hill
> > hunting) ;)
> >
> > Thanks for your help.
>
> Doesn't it run dog slow, though?
No. Fast as hell.
Check
> Solved setting x to 1024 and y to 768.
>
> Works great, but i am not able to complete the first race (bunny hill
> hunting) ;)
>
> Thanks for your help.
Doesn't it run dog slow, though?
On Die, 2002-11-19 at 10:33, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du mardi 19 novembre 2002, vers 10:07,
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> >> set x_resolution 640
> >> set y_resolution 480
>
> > Either set those to your panel resolution or remove any modes not
> >
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du mardi 19 novembre 2002, vers
11:38, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> Do you mean that 640x480 and 800x600 may work with some modelines ?
>> How can we calculate them ?
> 640x480 isn't supported by the LCD on the iBook dual-usb. Really doesn't
>
getOn Tue, 2002-11-19 at 09:33, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du mardi 19 novembre 2002, vers 10:07,
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> >> set x_resolution 640
> >> set y_resolution 480
>
> > Either set those to your panel resolution or remove any modes not
>
OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du mardi 19 novembre 2002, vers 10:07,
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> set x_resolution 640
>> set y_resolution 480
> Either set those to your panel resolution or remove any modes not
> fitting it from the Modes line in the XF86Config display subsection
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:07:19AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Die, 2002-11-19 at 10:01, Jesus Climent wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:38:37AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > What resolution is configured in ~/.tuxracer/options?
> >
> > set x_resolution 640
> > set y_resolution 480
S
On Die, 2002-11-19 at 10:01, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:38:37AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > What resolution is configured in ~/.tuxracer/options?
>
> set x_resolution 640
> set y_resolution 480
Either set those to your panel resolution or remove any modes not
fitting it
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:38:37AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> What resolution is configured in ~/.tuxracer/options?
set x_resolution 640
set y_resolution 480
set bpp_mode 0
--
Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB6 42339 1CAA 7064 E429
On Die, 2002-11-19 at 09:30, Jesus Climent wrote:
> After the last xfree upgrade i cannot run tuxracer anymore. The screen
> seems to be resized to 11XX x 8XX (or similar).
>
> The screen gets totally screwed, but exiting returns to a normal state.
What resolution is configured in ~/.tuxracer/opt
28 matches
Mail list logo
