> You can always educate them, but you can neither tell how many times
> it will take them for being educated nor whether they will accept
> to change their tools.
The only sure things in life are death and taxes. :)
> You cannot modify properly PDF or html. You cannot format properly
> text fil
En réponse à Brett Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hey, the World is not as simple as the way you seems to describe it.
> > You can individualy refuse proprietary software, at home that is.
> > At work, it's quite different (yes, using free software at work is
> > possible). What if some customers
> Hey, the World is not as simple as the way you seems to describe it.
> You can individualy refuse proprietary software, at home that is.
> At work, it's quite different (yes, using free software at work is
> possible). What if some customers only speak MS Word? Will you piss
> them off, or will y
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alessandro Selli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this License, you are granted a
> nonexclusive license to use the Specification for the sole purposes of
> developing Products that output SWF.
Is this believed to be enforceable i
Brett Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah really. I always considered the absence of a flash and real player for
> linux ppc a blessing not a curse. Why perpetuate proprietary data formats?
> I don't use it, and I don't go to sites that use it and don't provide an
> alternative. I suggest
christophe barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway for me the conclusion is that flash must be ignored and that I
> don't need a plugin for it.
Err, my approach is quite different: non-free software must be
ignored. I won't read flash if I need non-free software to
read it. I'm perfectly OK w
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:09:59PM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> |Outputing to the screen ?
> |
>
> According to the licence:
>
> 1.
>
> Definitions
>
> c Flash File Format (SWF) or SWF means the file format designated by .SWF
Have you already discussed this with the team behind
http:
> My understanding is that the Flash file format if documented.
> If this is true, this is a very good thing from Macromedia and I would
> prefer to encourage people to work on a Free player implementation (see
> apt-cache show swf-player) that would work on all architectures (not
> only ppc).
>
Il giorno Fri, 18 Apr 2003, christophe barbe così ha scritto:
|From: christophe barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: Debian PowerPC
|Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:39:52 -0400
|Subject: Re: Petition for a Flash plugin for Linux on PPC
|
|On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 05:00:04PM +0200, Alessandro Selli
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 05:00:04PM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this License, you are granted a
> nonexclusive license to use the Specification for the sole purposes of
> developing Products that output SWF.
Outputing to the screen ?
--
Christophe Barb
En réponse à Alessandro Selli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flash/open/licensing/fileformat/license2.html
>
> MACROMEDIA, INC
>
> Macromedia Flash File Format (SWF) Specification License Agreement
>
> [...]
>
> 2.Licenses
> Pursuant to the terms and conditions o
Il giorno Fri, 18 Apr 2003, christophe barbe così ha scritto:
|From: christophe barbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: Debian PowerPC
|Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:17:30 -0400
|Subject: Re: Petition for a Flash plugin for Linux on PPC
|
|On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 02:56:52PM +0200, Alessandro Selli
OoO En ce début d'après-midi nuageux du vendredi 18 avril 2003, vers
14:56, Alessandro Selli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Macromedia's licence does not allow people to produce their own flash
> players. They can only develop software to produce flash files.
Which licenses ?
--
Make sure spec
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 02:56:52PM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> Macromedia's licence does not allow people to produce their own flash
> players. They can only develop software to produce flash files.
Sure? The site http://www.openswf.org/ which seems to be the reference
seems to indicate th
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:19:07PM -0300, Rog?rio Brito wrote:
> Perhaps others may not know of a petition for Macromedia to
> release a flash plugin for Linux on PPC, but still be
> interested in it.
My understanding is that the Flash file format if documented.
If this is true,
15 matches
Mail list logo
