4 Nov 2003 09:11:06 +
> Subject: Fwd: Re: OT - worm problem
>
> Hi Joshua
>
> The mail escaped without the attachments - apologies, here they are
>
> Regards
>
> Clive
>
> - Forwarded message from Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
>
PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 09:08:54 +
> Subject: Re: OT - worm problem
>
> On (29/10/03 08:29), Joshua Narins wrote:
> > > Not sure if you're using a POP 3 account but I've been using mailfilter
> > > to delete these from the server prior to d
On (29/10/03 08:29), Joshua Narins wrote:
> > Not sure if you're using a POP 3 account but I've been using mailfilter
> > to delete these from the server prior to download with fetchmail and it
> > works pretty well. Let me know if you want the rc file off list. Even
> > if you aren't using POP3,
Hello Christophe,
you saved the day THX THX :
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:46:11PM -0500, christophe barbe wrote:
>
> Concerning swen, I use the following procmail rules:
.
>
> which are simples and very effectives.
Indeed they are!!!
As I have to ISDN-download via POP3 I found mailfi
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 08:29:04AM -0500, Joshua Narins wrote:
> Isn't there some smart debian person who could figure out where this
> is coming from?
An awful lot of random infected Windows machines, I strongly suspect.
There Is No Cabal.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
> Not sure if you're using a POP 3 account but I've been using mailfilter
> to delete these from the server prior to download with fetchmail and it
> works pretty well. Let me know if you want the rc file off list. Even
> if you aren't using POP3, you may be able to adapt it for filtering in
>
On (28/10/03 14:36), dylan wrote:
> I have tried to implement such a scheme with an exim system filter... but
> strangely enough it only *sort of* works... about half of the emails come
> through... or if i wait long enough it seems like all of them do...(but only
> on weekdays? :) )
>
> has anyo
Hi Christophe,
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 04:46:11PM -0500, christophe barbe wrote:
>
> which are simples and very effectives.
>
> Christophe
>
I'll try to convince my provider to use your rules to protect me -
let's see ...
In any case THX very much for explanation and help :)
--
M.f.G.
Ge
I have tried to implement such a scheme with an exim system filter... but
strangely enough it only *sort of* works... about half of the emails come
through... or if i wait long enough it seems like all of them do...(but only
on weekdays? :) )
has anyone put together some exim-style rules for filt
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:27:27PM -0800, Johnathon Jamison wrote:
> What is the chance that email addresses in the archives could be
> modified to say something like
> * From: Zach Archer
> instead of
> * From: Zach Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> so the email address spiders do not get the
yep me too...
on 03.10.28 0:27 PM, Johnathon Jamison at [EMAIL PROTECTED] was
reported to have writen:
> Ah-ha! So that is where I am getting them! The same thing happened to
> me. I had a suspision.
>
> What is the chance that email addresses in the archives could be
> modified to say someth
Ah-ha! So that is where I am getting them! The same thing happened to
me. I had a suspision.
What is the chance that email addresses in the archives could be
modified to say something like
* From: Zach Archer
instead of
* From: Zach Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so the email address s
12 matches
Mail list logo
