On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 02:47:12PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 10:08:03AM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
> >
> > > It shouldn't be difficult to modify the buildd package to check with
> > > powerpc.debian.org (tervola) to check out packages to build and merge the
> > >
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 10:08:03AM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote:
>
> > It shouldn't be difficult to modify the buildd package to check with
> > powerpc.debian.org (tervola) to check out packages to build and merge the
> > results back with tervola. Anybody real familiar with buildd and willing
>
> It shouldn't be difficult to modify the buildd package to check with
> powerpc.debian.org (tervola) to check out packages to build and merge the
> results back with tervola. Anybody real familiar with buildd and willing
> to modify it? I think James Troup wrote it...
Roman Hodek is the main a
> Judging by the number of deb packages that compile fine but are out-of-date
> in the PPC tree, is more CPU horsepower needed to auto-build?
No need, one auto-builder is enough.
> I don't know what the protocol for this is, but I would be more than willing
> to run a debian-compiler instead of
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 04:27:44PM -0500, Kevin Puetz wrote:
> Judging by the number of deb packages that compile fine but are out-of-date
> in the PPC tree, is more CPU horsepower needed to auto-build?
>
> I don't know what the protocol for this is, but I would be more than willing
> to run a deb
On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Kevin Puetz wrote:
> Judging by the number of deb packages that compile fine but are out-of-date
> in the PPC tree, is more CPU horsepower needed to auto-build?
>
> I don't know what the protocol for this is, but I would be more than willing
> to run a debian-compiler instead
6 matches
Mail list logo
