On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 10:25 +0100, ruben wrote:
> At Sun, 19 Mar 2006 00:19:51 -0700, Michael Clawson wrote:
> >
> > Did you do a full build according to
> > http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building ? Or did you just build the
> > DRM and not Mesa?
>
> I did build the DRM kernel module from th
At Sun, 19 Mar 2006 00:19:51 -0700, Michael Clawson wrote:
>
> Did you do a full build according to
> http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building ? Or did you just build the
> DRM and not Mesa?
I did build the DRM kernel module from that site. I downloaded the
mesa source of the debian package a
Did you do a full build according to
http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building ? Or did you just build the
DRM and not Mesa?
Michael
PS. I am not on the list. I am just reading it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
At Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:21:51 +0100, Francesco Pedrini wrote:
>
> Does sleep works with new drm? I've tried 2.6.15 with dri and radeon modules,
> all works fine, excepts sleep...
> With 2.6.14.2 (last that i've compiled here) sleeps works really fine.
Yeah, sleep works just fine with the new drm
On Saturday 14 January 2006 16:03, Ruben wrote:
> This made me wonder whether I needed a more up-to-date DRM, so I got
> the DRM kernel modules from cvs (dri.freedesktop.org), and it's
> working right now.
>
> [drm] Module unloaded
> [drm] Initialized drm 1.0.1 20051102
> [drm] Initialized radeon 1
At Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:47:52 +0100, Ruben wrote:
>
> At Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:58:54 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ dmesg | grep drm
> > > [drm] Initialized drm 1.0.0 20040925
> >
> > There should be some output from the radeon module here. Please post the
> > kernel o
At Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:58:54 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> The X server creates and removes the nodes as they are (not) needed. If
> the missing node was the problem, the error would be 'No such file or
> directory'.
ok
> > That was what I thought at first, but I did have DRM+Radeon enabled i
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 14:50 +0100, Ruben wrote:
> At Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:15:34 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >
> > Maybe, but the X server creates the device nodes on the fly as necessary
> > anyway.
>
> Not in my case it seems. I tried creating the device node manually
> (mknod /dev/dri/card0 c
At Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:15:34 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> Maybe, but the X server creates the device nodes on the fly as necessary
> anyway.
Not in my case it seems. I tried creating the device node manually
(mknod /dev/dri/card0 c 226 0) before starting X, but then X removes
it.
> > drmOpe
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 21:00 +0100, Ruben wrote:
>
> The radeon module gets loaded by xorg, but /dev/dri remains empty :(
> Shouldn't the /dev/dri/card0 be created by udev upon loading the
> radeon module?
Maybe, but the X server creates the device nodes on the fly as necessary
anyway.
> drmOpen
10 matches
Mail list logo
