On Sep 04 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ok, are you saying that you managed to build miboot floppies using the
> old woody miboot floppies,
Yes, I did.
> (i think woody came with do-it-yourself-miboot stuff, not sure).
I don't know anything about building miboot from scratch.
> This would then be
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:36:27AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Sep 04 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, are you saying that you managed to build miboot floppies using the
> > old woody miboot floppies,
>
> Yes, I did.
>
> > (i think woody came with do-it-yourself-miboot stuff, not sure).
>
>
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 06:54:57AM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> I know that this may be off-topic for the bug, but just for archiving
> purposes, I'm also sending it to the BTS.
>
> On Sep 03 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> > There has been some discussion about using hfs formatted floppies with
> > t
I know that this may be off-topic for the bug, but just for archiving
purposes, I'm also sending it to the BTS.
On Sep 03 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> There has been some discussion about using hfs formatted floppies with
> the kernel on it without miboot though.
Are you talking about the discussio
> > So please reassign the bug to whatever seems appropriate. Not being able
> > to upgrade from woody to current testing/unstable is what I'd consider a
> > bug in its own right.
>
> It's seems you are not aware that Sarge is out and is now the stable
I'm well aware of that, thank you very much.
Michael Schmitz a écrit :
reassign 326220 apt
Your system looks older than a testing from April 2005. libc6 version
2.2.5-11.8 is a libc6 from Woody, an Debian does not support direct
Woody -> Etch upgrade.
So please reassign the bug to whatever seems appropriate. Not being able
to upgrade
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:50:09AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Well, apt or dpkg should have figured that out, and warned me off to not
> > > attempt the upgrade, right? Yet another bug.
> > >
> > > The system is booted using a floppy, I'm not sure I can even fit a 2.4 or
> > > 2.6 kernel o
> > Well, apt or dpkg should have figured that out, and warned me off to not
> > attempt the upgrade, right? Yet another bug.
> >
> > The system is booted using a floppy, I'm not sure I can even fit a 2.4 or
> > 2.6 kernel on there. Either way, 'you should not try that' is not an
>
> The 2.6.8 sarg
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:30:22AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> reassign 326220 apt
>
> > Your system looks older than a testing from April 2005. libc6 version
> > 2.2.5-11.8 is a libc6 from Woody, an Debian does not support direct
> > Woody -> Etch upgrade.
>
> So please reassign the bug to w
reassign 326220 apt
> Your system looks older than a testing from April 2005. libc6 version
> 2.2.5-11.8 is a libc6 from Woody, an Debian does not support direct
> Woody -> Etch upgrade.
So please reassign the bug to whatever seems appropriate. Not being able
to upgrade from woody to current test
10 matches
Mail list logo
